S.O.S - eVoice For Justice - e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor: Nagaraj.M.R....... vol.5 . issue.25 .........20/06/2009
Editorial : POLICE COMPLAINT AGAINST HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF
In
equal , have right to equal oppurtunity & equitable justice
irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has
guaranteed these to every Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN
RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth.
However in
SERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords ,
autocrats - unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL
FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public,
public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &
paymasters of this very same public servants.
In
wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last
resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there
corruption has spread.In present day
is rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean from
courts of law. there are corrupt police officials
who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up
different line of investigation , fix innocents ,
coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture ,
file B report closing the case , decides not to
appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the
list of millionnaire police officials who are
caught by karnataka lokayukta.
Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a
deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way
of presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooks
for a price , as observed in high profile
BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RK
ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates ,
together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is
left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest,
he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is
corrupt , people's last hope , democracy is dead. nowadays
we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.
our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST
LITIGATION before hon'ble supreme court of india,
but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ?
ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.
The issues raised by us for sample :
1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages ,
colas affecting the health of millions of indians
& public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous
products from
2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits ,
tribals , backward castes by government authorities
whereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings
by high & mighty people in total disregard to law.
in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying
court orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.
3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws ,
pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.
4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants
leaking
& some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti
nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf
countries & elsewhere.
these type of appeals are for public good , national
security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of
our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider
even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts
even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good ,
inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints.
over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was
very low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible
for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me.
Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chief
justice of
are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &
PRESIDENT OF
nationals ,
amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a
cognizable offence.
We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies ,
public servants , but it is an appeal to the
honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt
colleagues.
Hereby , i do once again appeal to the honourable chief
justice of
to go through the following articles , to provide the requested
information in full , to order the subordinate public servants to
take appropriate action & to provide the requested information in full
and finally to accept this whole issue of news paper as a
PIL Appeal & to provide justice to the public. JAI HIND. VANDE
MATARAM.
Your's sincerely,
NAGARAJ.M.R.
Judgements for sale in Indian courts?
Recent events in
become rampant in Indian judidciary. Hereby we appeal to the honest few in
judiciary to stem this rot & to publicly answer the following questionnaire .
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ , http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
suspected extremists that unravelled a murky nexus between touts and judges has
landed the
surveillance, investigators alleged that cases were being fixed.
But on Thursday, a day after the
taped evidence of corruption in the state's judicial system, top
government officials evaded the issue.
The vigilance department reports were prepared after state authorities allowed
tapping of two mobile phones of people linked to Sikh militants trying to
re-group in
But what the tapping revealed was a deep malaise in the state's judicial system.
The reports clearly indicate the names of two sitting high court judges and
officers in the lower judiciary. These stated that touts were charging money for
fixing up cases in the high court and lower courts, manipulating listing of
cases and even affecting appointments of judges in lower courts.
Top
the office of the
S.F. Rodrigues had not forwarded any communication to the prime minister's
office (PMO).
'No communication about the said report has ever been sent by the governor of
Punjab to the prime minister's office in New Delhi,' an official spokesman
clarified here.
have not read the report. I will comment only after seeing it.'
Attempts to reach Chief Secretary Ramesh Inder Singh failed. His office staff,
after asking about the issue to be discussed, said that he was busy in meetings.
The reports, forwarded by top vigilance department officials to
Advocate General H.S. Mattewal throughout 2008, have been sent to the Chief
Justice of
action, it was reported Thursday.
High court officials here refused to speak on the matter.
Controversies are nothing new to this high court.
The last one to rock it was the cash-for-judgement scam in which the names of
two women high court judges, Justices Nirmal Yadav and Nirmaljit Kaur, figured
after a packet containing Rs 1.5 mn (15 lakh) 'mistakenly' landed at the house
of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Aug last year.
The packet was purportedly meant for Justice Nirmal Yadav and the scam led to
the arrest of former Haryana additional advocate general Sanjeev Bansal and
others. The scam exposed the lawyer-judge-businessman nexus in the high court.
In the same high court 25 out of 27 judges went on protest mass casual leave - a
thing unprecedented and unheard of in Indian judiciary - April 19, 2004. The
protesting judges were against the then chief justice B.K. Roy summoning two of
them to seek an explanation about taking the membership of a controversial and
illegal golf club near here.
The golf club's case was pending before the high court when the two judges
became its members.
The virtual 'strike' by the judges created an uproar nationally in the judicial
community forcing the Chief Justice of
of the high court and severely admonish them.
In June 2002, then high court chief justice Arun B. Saharya withdrew work from
three judges whose name figured in a recruitment scam in the
Service Commission (PPSC) and its chairman Ravinder Pal Sigh Sidhu.
While the children of two judges benefited with class-I government jobs in
Sidhu's cash-for-job scam, the third judge got several of his candidates
through.
While the PPSC scam controversy lingered, the judges, got their jobs back after
a while.
The case of V. Ramaswami, a former chief justice of this high court, reached
parliament for impeachment in 1993 after he was accused of financial
irregularities and misuse of official position during his tenure here.
However, the impeachment of Ramaswami, who became a Supreme Court judge after
his tenure here, did not take place due to divisions in parliament over the
issue.
Questions public servants are afraid to answer
The police , judges , public servants , etc question the accussed
persons , to ascertain the root cause of crime or dispute, to know the
truth behind every actions. The police even apply 3rd degree torture
on commoners ( although it is illegal ) to elicit truth , information
about crimes. When the same public wants to know the truth behind
crimes involving police , judges & public servants , and seeking truth
, answers , informations as per RTI ACT from police , judges & public
servants , they are not answering lest the truth come out. They are
citing one or the other technical reasons to hide information , to
hide truth about crimes , to shield the criminals. If any of the
following public servants truly stands for law , justice , truth , let
them answer for the following questions publicly through media
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI ,
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK ,
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA ,
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
,
http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA ,
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201
PUBLIC COMPLAINT TO HONOURABLE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE ,
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
Respected sir,
I have made a complaint to your honourable self on 10/12/2004
regarding human rights & fundamental rights violations ,
at a press meet organized at PATRAKATARA BHAVANA ,
no action has been taken , when I asked your office
questions about human rights , fundamental rights violations ,
corruption & other crimes as per RTI ACT , they just gave
me half truths. Hereby I do once again request you to take appropriate
action on the above said complaint & to give me
full truthful information to my RTI application.. thanking you.
On-line complaint no : DARPG/E/2008/09467
Date :08.04.2009 Your's sincerely,
Place :
POLICE COMPLAINT AGAINST HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF
H.E.HONOURABLE PRESIDENT OF
From,
NAGARAJ.M.R.
LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE,
LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL,
Through,
Honourable DG & IG of Police ,
State Police H.Q ,
To,
Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,
Vijayanagar Police Station,
Honourable Sir,
Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS by
Honourable Chief Jusice of
H.E.Honourable President of
In
equal , have right to equal oppurtunity &
equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the
constitution has guaranteed these to every indian
citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every
humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of
his / her birth.
However in
SERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords ,
autocrats - unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL
FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public,
public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &
paymasters of this very same public servants.
In
wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last
resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there
corruption has spread.In present day
is rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean from
courts of law. there are corrupt police officials
who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up
different line of investigation , fix innocents ,
coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture ,
file B report closing the case , decides not to
appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the
list of millionnaire police officials who are
caught by karnataka lokayukta.
Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a
deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way
of presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooks
for a price , as observed in high profile
BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RK
ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates ,
together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is
left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest,
he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is
corrupt , people's last hope , democracy is dead. nowadays
we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.
our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST
LITIGATION before hon'ble supreme court of india,
but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ?
ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.
The issues raised by us for sample :
1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages ,
colas affecting the health of millions of indians
& public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous
products from
2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits ,
tribals , backward castes by government authorities
whereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings
by high & mighty people in total disregard to law.
in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying
court orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.
3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws ,
pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.
4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants
leaking
& some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti
nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf
countries & elsewhere.
these type of appeals are for public good , national
security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of
our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider
even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts
even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good ,
inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints.
over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was
very low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible
for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me.
Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chief
justice of
are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &
PRESIDENT OF
nationals ,
amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a
cognizable offence.
We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies ,
public servants , but it is an appeal to the
honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt
colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India & H.E.Honourable
President of
have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional
duties , suppressed material truths / informations & thereby
repeatedly
violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & BASIC
HUMAN RIGHTS & Obstructing me from performing constitutionally
prescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF
request you to legally prosecute the above two public servants
on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper &
the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this
complaint.
thanking you.
your's sincerely,
nagaraj.m.r.
CAN JUDGEMENT BE MANIPULATED IN INDIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE ? - WHY NOT
PRISON SENTENCE FOR GUILTY SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES ?
senior advocate R K Anand and colleague I U Khan on Thursday for
interfering with judicial proceedings in the high-profile BMW hit-and-
run case. A fine of Rs 2,000 was levied as well.
On May 30, 2007, television channel NDTV caught both lawyers in a
"sting" operation, conniving with key prosecution witness Suniel
Kulkarni to get main accused Sanjeev Nanda off the hook.
A High Court Bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and Manmohan
Sarin found the two guilty of criminal contempt.
"The entire material leaves a bitter taste in the mouth about the
goings-on in the BMW case. There is no manner of doubt whatsoever that
there was complicity between Mr Khan and Mr Anand... There can be
absolutely no doubt that Mr Khan and Mr Anand were, somehow or the
other, more than mixed up in the BMW case," observed the court, which
had taken suo motu cognizance of the expose the day after it was
aired.
"Mr Anand and Mr Khan are prohibited from appearing in this court
(
today. However, they are free to discharge their professional duties
in terms of consultation, advice, conferences, opinions, etc," said
the Bench.
The court desisted from commenting on the conduct of Kulkarni, saying
it would not be "proper" to do so.
Though the verdict comes solely on basis of the CDs and transcripts of
the sting operation, the Bench said, "the unshakeable truth is that Mr
Anand is guilty of criminal contempt of court".
Contemplating a fit punishment, the Bench wondered how many in the
legal fraternity had had been taken by surprise to find Anand
indulging in such "sharp practices". "Mr Anand has held many
prestigious elective positions in the legal fraternity, including the
Bar Council of
noted the Bench.
The court said it knew Khan for his legal acumen and forensic skills —
"perhaps the reason why he was appointed Special Public Prosecutor in
the BMW case". High expectations over Khan fell apart when his conduct
"betrayed the trust that prosecution reposed in him... what he did was
perhaps beyond the realm of contemplation of the prosecuting agency".
Chastising the two for their misconduct, the Bench said: "We are not
dealing with a young lawyer who, driven by ambition and desire...
transgresses the limits or unwittingly or unknowingly commits criminal
contempt. We are dealing with senior advocates, who are expected to
conduct themselves as gentlemen and role models for younger members of
the Bar."
The court forwarded a recommendation that the two be "stripped of
their designations as senior advocates". The High Court Registrar
General will put up the court's recommendation before Chief Justice AP
Shah within a month.
In response to the verdict, the
advocate Rajiv Khosla, said about 20,000 lawyers from district courts
were going on strike on August 22 in protest.
R K Anand
Began legal career in
1967. Appointed government counsel in 1976. In 2000, JMM nominated him
to Rajya Sabha from Jharkhand. Appointed AICC observer for Assembly
polls in Himachal Pradesh in February 2003.
High-profile cases:
* In 1980, represented the late Indira Gandhi in a property litigation
filed by Maneka Gandhi after Sanjay Gandhi's death
* Narasimha Rao in the JMM bribery and the St Kitts case
* Chandraswami in the FERA violation case
* H K L Bhagat in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case
* Former external affairs minister Natwar Singh's son Jagat Singh in
the murder/suicide of his wife Natasha Singh
I U Khan
One of the top five criminal lawyers in Capital. He was charging a fee
of only Re 1 in the BMW case. Began his career in late 1960s, and came
intio spotlight in 1980s.
* Defended Sushil Sharma in the tandoor murder case, Subash Gupta in
the Personal Point triple murder, former Youth Congress President
Romesh Sharma in several cases and Tony Gill in Jessica Lall murder
case
When prosecution & defence lawyer together team up along with corrupt
police / public servants and manipulate evidences / records , the
court is helpless and will acquit the accussed for lack of evidences
eventhough the presiding judge is of impeccable integrity , honesty ,
he is help less. Add to this , if the presiding judge happens to be
corrupt & teams up with the criminal nexus , the result is
devastating , the rich criminal will get away & the innocent will
suffer punishment in some cases even death sentence.
Who will bell these few corrupt among the judiciary , bar , police &
public service ? why not prison sentence for two leading advocates
on criminal charges of contempt of court , destruction of evidences ?
are they above law ? why favouritism by court to the guilty in
awarding punishment to guilty two advocates as they happen to be
political influential ? will the court let a common man so leniently
for the same charges ? In the past cases dealt by these corrupt duo
advocates , there are possibilities that the same tactics of
manipulation of evidences , prosecution is done to win the cases , to
free the rich criminals , why not review of the cases dealt by these
corrupt advocates ?
The honest few among judiciary , bar , police & public service must
uphold our constitution , rule of law & bring to book their corrupt
colleagues.
AN APPEAL TO HONOURABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF MANIPUR
Dear Sir ,
Names of victims:
1. Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh, aged about 35 years, son of late Mr. Sharat Singh, Singjamei Oinam Thingel, Singjamei, Imphal west District, Manipur
2. Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh, aged 44 years, son of late P. Ibomcha Singh, Haobam Marak Keisham Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur
Name of alleged perpetrators:
Officers attached to the
Date of incident: From 16 May to 23 May 2009
Place of incident: Imphal, Manipur
I am writing to express concern about the case of Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh, about 35-years-old, son of late Mr. Sharat Singh, Singjamei Oinam Thingel, Singjamei, Imphal west District, Manipur and Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh, about 44-years-old, son of late P. Ibomcha Singh, Haobam Marak Keisham Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur.
I am informed that both Satish and Pebam were taken into custody by officers attached to the
I am informed that Pebam was seriously threatened by the Assam Rifles officers before his release and that a false case has since been registered against him; that the officers have threatened Pebam with death should he disclose the facts to anyone upon release. For this very reason, he has requested for immediate security from the state government.
I am also aware that this is not the first incident depicting the use of arbitrary force by the paramilitary officers stationed in Manipur; several civil society organisations inside and outside India and the United Nations have expressed concern about this to the government of India. I therefore request you to:
1. Ensure that a complete statement of Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh is recorded by the local police;
2. Launch an immediate investigation into the entire incident;
3. Provide Pebam with security pending the entire process of investigation and the possible prosecution of the perpetrators;
4. Arrange interim compensation for the family of Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh by the state.
Your's sincerely,
Nagaraj.M.R.
AN APPEAL TO HONOUARABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF MEGHALAYA
Dear Sir ,
Name of victim: Ms. Hasina Kharbhih, Team Leader, Impulse NGO Network, Ranee's Abode, near
Name of alleged perpetrators:
1. Ms. Bethswa Dympep, accused in case number OC 9436337226 of Sardar Police Station, Shillong, Meghalaya
Date of incident: 27 May 2009
Place of incident: Shillong, Meghalaya
I am writing to express my concern about the threat to the life and security of Ms. Hasina Kharbhih, a noted human rights defender working against human trafficking. I am informed that Kharbhih has been contesting a criminal case against Ms. Bethswa Dympep at the local courts in Shillong and that since the beginning of the case Dympep has been threatening Kharbhih and her colleagues with personal harm and the closure of her office, demanding the withdrawal of the case from the court. However the police have not taken any action upon the complaint and have allowed Dympep to continue with her threats in private, and in the public eye.
I am informed that on May 27 in particular, Kharbhih was verbally abused and assaulted by Dympep in front of the local court, and has filed a complaint at the Lumbiengri Police Station. The police failed to arrest Dympep on the excuse that they could not locate her, yet I am informed that after the incident the assailant had convened a press conference at the local press club, a public event which the local police were aware of.
The lack of police action suggests that Dympep is using her influence to prevent the due process of law from taking its own course. In these circumstances, I request that you immediately take swift assertive action to ensure that Kharbhih remains safe throughout this trial and after, and that an investigation is ordered into the entire incident. I also request that if required, Dympep be taken into custody on the basis of the complaint filed by Kharbhih against her at Lumbiengri Police Station. Human rights defenders carry out a valuable and necessary service, often at the expense of their lives. Any government should give their safety utmost priority.
Yours sincerely,
Nagaraj.M.,R.
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,
home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/ , http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ , http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
contact : naghrw@... , nagarajhrw@...
No comments:
Post a Comment