Police Complaint

S.O.S - eVoice For Justice - e-news weekly Spreading the light of humanity & freedom Editor: Nagaraj.M.R....... vol.5 . issue.25 .........20/06/2009 Editorial : POLICE COMPLAINT AGAINST HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA & H.E.HONOURABLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are equal , have right to equal oppurtunity & equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has guaranteed these to every Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth. However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC SERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords , autocrats - unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public, public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers & paymasters of this very same public servants. In India , corruption has spread it's tentacles far & wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there corruption has spread.In present day India , if one is rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean from courts of law. there are corrupt police officials who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up different line of investigation , fix innocents , coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture , file B report closing the case , decides not to appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the list of millionnaire police officials who are caught by karnataka lokayukta. Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way of presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooks for a price , as observed in high profile BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RK ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates , together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest, he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is corrupt , people's last hope , democracy is dead. nowadays we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary. our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION before hon'ble supreme court of india, but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ? ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS. The issues raised by us for sample : 1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages , colas affecting the health of millions of indians & public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous products from india . 2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits , tribals , backward castes by government authorities whereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings by high & mighty people in total disregard to law. in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying court orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers. 3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws , pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies. 4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants leaking india's defense secrets to foreign countries & some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf countries & elsewhere. these type of appeals are for public good , national security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of india is not considering our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good , inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints. over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was very low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me. Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chief justice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI & PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high & mighty criminals , anti nationals , amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a cognizable offence. We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies , public servants , but it is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt colleagues. Hereby , i do once again appeal to the honourable chief justice of india & H.E.Honourable president of india to go through the following articles , to provide the requested information in full , to order the subordinate public servants to take appropriate action & to provide the requested information in full and finally to accept this whole issue of news paper as a PIL Appeal & to provide justice to the public. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM. Your's sincerely, NAGARAJ.M.R. Judgements for sale in Indian courts? Recent events in Punjab & haryana high court proves that , corruption has become rampant in Indian judidciary. Hereby we appeal to the honest few in judiciary to stem this rot & to publicly answer the following questionnaire . http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ , http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ , Punjab and Haryana High Court in another soup Chandigarh, June 4 (IANS) A vigilance department report based on surveillance of suspected extremists that unravelled a murky nexus between touts and judges has landed the Punjab and Haryana High Court in another controversy. Following the surveillance, investigators alleged that cases were being fixed. But on Thursday, a day after the Punjab vigilance department report pointed out taped evidence of corruption in the state's judicial system, top Punjab government officials evaded the issue. The vigilance department reports were prepared after state authorities allowed tapping of two mobile phones of people linked to Sikh militants trying to re-group in Punjab. But what the tapping revealed was a deep malaise in the state's judicial system. The reports clearly indicate the names of two sitting high court judges and officers in the lower judiciary. These stated that touts were charging money for fixing up cases in the high court and lower courts, manipulating listing of cases and even affecting appointments of judges in lower courts. Top Punjab government officials Thursday chose to avoid the controversy even as the office of the Punjab governor issued a clarification saying that Governor S.F. Rodrigues had not forwarded any communication to the prime minister's office (PMO). 'No communication about the said report has ever been sent by the governor of Punjab to the prime minister's office in New Delhi,' an official spokesman clarified here. Punjab government's media adviser Harcharan Bains said: 'I am out of station and have not read the report. I will comment only after seeing it.' Attempts to reach Chief Secretary Ramesh Inder Singh failed. His office staff, after asking about the issue to be discussed, said that he was busy in meetings. The reports, forwarded by top vigilance department officials to Punjab's Advocate General H.S. Mattewal throughout 2008, have been sent to the Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for further action, it was reported Thursday. High court officials here refused to speak on the matter. Controversies are nothing new to this high court. The last one to rock it was the cash-for-judgement scam in which the names of two women high court judges, Justices Nirmal Yadav and Nirmaljit Kaur, figured after a packet containing Rs 1.5 mn (15 lakh) 'mistakenly' landed at the house of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Aug last year. The packet was purportedly meant for Justice Nirmal Yadav and the scam led to the arrest of former Haryana additional advocate general Sanjeev Bansal and others. The scam exposed the lawyer-judge-businessman nexus in the high court. In the same high court 25 out of 27 judges went on protest mass casual leave - a thing unprecedented and unheard of in Indian judiciary - April 19, 2004. The protesting judges were against the then chief justice B.K. Roy summoning two of them to seek an explanation about taking the membership of a controversial and illegal golf club near here. The golf club's case was pending before the high court when the two judges became its members. The virtual 'strike' by the judges created an uproar nationally in the judicial community forcing the Chief Justice of India to summon the three topmost judges of the high court and severely admonish them. In June 2002, then high court chief justice Arun B. Saharya withdrew work from three judges whose name figured in a recruitment scam in the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC) and its chairman Ravinder Pal Sigh Sidhu. While the children of two judges benefited with class-I government jobs in Sidhu's cash-for-job scam, the third judge got several of his candidates through. While the PPSC scam controversy lingered, the judges, got their jobs back after a while. The case of V. Ramaswami, a former chief justice of this high court, reached parliament for impeachment in 1993 after he was accused of financial irregularities and misuse of official position during his tenure here. However, the impeachment of Ramaswami, who became a Supreme Court judge after his tenure here, did not take place due to divisions in parliament over the issue. Questions public servants are afraid to answer The police , judges , public servants , etc question the accussed persons , to ascertain the root cause of crime or dispute, to know the truth behind every actions. The police even apply 3rd degree torture on commoners ( although it is illegal ) to elicit truth , information about crimes. When the same public wants to know the truth behind crimes involving police , judges & public servants , and seeking truth , answers , informations as per RTI ACT from police , judges & public servants , they are not answering lest the truth come out. They are citing one or the other technical reasons to hide information , to hide truth about crimes , to shield the criminals. If any of the following public servants truly stands for law , justice , truth , let them answer for the following questions publicly through media CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ , http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ , CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI – http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ , http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ , CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE – http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ , http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ , CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/ , http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE – http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ , CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE – http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ , CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218 MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ , http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 are you ready to catch tax thieves ? http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ , http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ , http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 reliance industry where is accountability ? http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ , http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 crimes at infosys campus http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ , http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214 crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 crimes of land mafia in India http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ , http://landscam.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 currency thefts in RBI Press http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80 killer colas & killer medicines of India http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ , http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ , http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201 PUBLIC COMPLAINT TO HONOURABLE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE Respected sir, I have made a complaint to your honourable self on 10/12/2004 regarding human rights & fundamental rights violations , at a press meet organized at PATRAKATARA BHAVANA , MYSORE. Till date no action has been taken , when I asked your office questions about human rights , fundamental rights violations , corruption & other crimes as per RTI ACT , they just gave me half truths. Hereby I do once again request you to take appropriate action on the above said complaint & to give me full truthful information to my RTI application.. thanking you. On-line complaint no : DARPG/E/2008/09467 Date :08.04.2009 Your's sincerely, Place :Mysore Nagaraj.M.R. POLICE COMPLAINT AGAINST HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA & H.E.HONOURABLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA From, NAGARAJ.M.R. LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL, MYSORE - 570017. Through, Honourable DG & IG of Police , State Police H.Q , Bangalore. To, Honourable Circle Inspector of Police, Vijayanagar Police Station, Mysore. Honourable Sir, Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS by Honourable Chief Jusice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are equal , have right to equal oppurtunity & equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has guaranteed these to every indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth. However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC SERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords , autocrats - unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public, public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers & paymasters of this very same public servants. In India , corruption has spread it's tentacles far & wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there corruption has spread.In present day India , if one is rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean from courts of law. there are corrupt police officials who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up different line of investigation , fix innocents , coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture , file B report closing the case , decides not to appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the list of millionnaire police officials who are caught by karnataka lokayukta. Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way of presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooks for a price , as observed in high profile BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RK ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates , together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest, he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is corrupt , people's last hope , democracy is dead. nowadays we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary. our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION before hon'ble supreme court of india, but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ? ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS. The issues raised by us for sample : 1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages , colas affecting the health of millions of indians & public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous products from india . 2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits , tribals , backward castes by government authorities whereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings by high & mighty people in total disregard to law. in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying court orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers. 3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws , pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies. 4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants leaking india's defense secrets to foreign countries & some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf countries & elsewhere. these type of appeals are for public good , national security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of india is not considering our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good , inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints. over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was very low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me. Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chief justice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI & PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high & mighty criminals , anti nationals , amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a cognizable offence. We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies , public servants , but it is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional duties , suppressed material truths / informations & thereby repeatedly violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS & Obstructing me from performing constitutionally prescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA. Hereby , i do request you to legally prosecute the above two public servants on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper & the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this complaint. thanking you. your's sincerely, nagaraj.m.r. CAN JUDGEMENT BE MANIPULATED IN INDIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE ? - WHY NOT PRISON SENTENCE FOR GUILTY SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES ? New Delhi, August 21 The Delhi High Court imposed a four-month ban on senior advocate R K Anand and colleague I U Khan on Thursday for interfering with judicial proceedings in the high-profile BMW hit-and- run case. A fine of Rs 2,000 was levied as well. On May 30, 2007, television channel NDTV caught both lawyers in a "sting" operation, conniving with key prosecution witness Suniel Kulkarni to get main accused Sanjeev Nanda off the hook. A High Court Bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and Manmohan Sarin found the two guilty of criminal contempt. "The entire material leaves a bitter taste in the mouth about the goings-on in the BMW case. There is no manner of doubt whatsoever that there was complicity between Mr Khan and Mr Anand... There can be absolutely no doubt that Mr Khan and Mr Anand were, somehow or the other, more than mixed up in the BMW case," observed the court, which had taken suo motu cognizance of the expose the day after it was aired. "Mr Anand and Mr Khan are prohibited from appearing in this court (Delhi High Court) or courts subordinate to it for four months from today. However, they are free to discharge their professional duties in terms of consultation, advice, conferences, opinions, etc," said the Bench. The court desisted from commenting on the conduct of Kulkarni, saying it would not be "proper" to do so. Though the verdict comes solely on basis of the CDs and transcripts of the sting operation, the Bench said, "the unshakeable truth is that Mr Anand is guilty of criminal contempt of court". Contemplating a fit punishment, the Bench wondered how many in the legal fraternity had had been taken by surprise to find Anand indulging in such "sharp practices". "Mr Anand has held many prestigious elective positions in the legal fraternity, including the Bar Council of Delhi. He has also been a Member of the Rajya Sabha," noted the Bench. The court said it knew Khan for his legal acumen and forensic skills — "perhaps the reason why he was appointed Special Public Prosecutor in the BMW case". High expectations over Khan fell apart when his conduct "betrayed the trust that prosecution reposed in him... what he did was perhaps beyond the realm of contemplation of the prosecuting agency". Chastising the two for their misconduct, the Bench said: "We are not dealing with a young lawyer who, driven by ambition and desire... transgresses the limits or unwittingly or unknowingly commits criminal contempt. We are dealing with senior advocates, who are expected to conduct themselves as gentlemen and role models for younger members of the Bar." The court forwarded a recommendation that the two be "stripped of their designations as senior advocates". The High Court Registrar General will put up the court's recommendation before Chief Justice AP Shah within a month. In response to the verdict, the Delhi Bar Association president, advocate Rajiv Khosla, said about 20,000 lawyers from district courts were going on strike on August 22 in protest. R K Anand Began legal career in Delhi's Tis Hazari Court as a civil lawyer in 1967. Appointed government counsel in 1976. In 2000, JMM nominated him to Rajya Sabha from Jharkhand. Appointed AICC observer for Assembly polls in Himachal Pradesh in February 2003. High-profile cases: * In 1980, represented the late Indira Gandhi in a property litigation filed by Maneka Gandhi after Sanjay Gandhi's death * Narasimha Rao in the JMM bribery and the St Kitts case * Chandraswami in the FERA violation case * H K L Bhagat in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case * Former external affairs minister Natwar Singh's son Jagat Singh in the murder/suicide of his wife Natasha Singh I U Khan One of the top five criminal lawyers in Capital. He was charging a fee of only Re 1 in the BMW case. Began his career in late 1960s, and came intio spotlight in 1980s. * Defended Sushil Sharma in the tandoor murder case, Subash Gupta in the Personal Point triple murder, former Youth Congress President Romesh Sharma in several cases and Tony Gill in Jessica Lall murder case When prosecution & defence lawyer together team up along with corrupt police / public servants and manipulate evidences / records , the court is helpless and will acquit the accussed for lack of evidences eventhough the presiding judge is of impeccable integrity , honesty , he is help less. Add to this , if the presiding judge happens to be corrupt & teams up with the criminal nexus , the result is devastating , the rich criminal will get away & the innocent will suffer punishment in some cases even death sentence. Who will bell these few corrupt among the judiciary , bar , police & public service ? why not prison sentence for two leading advocates on criminal charges of contempt of court , destruction of evidences ? are they above law ? why favouritism by court to the guilty in awarding punishment to guilty two advocates as they happen to be political influential ? will the court let a common man so leniently for the same charges ? In the past cases dealt by these corrupt duo advocates , there are possibilities that the same tactics of manipulation of evidences , prosecution is done to win the cases , to free the rich criminals , why not review of the cases dealt by these corrupt advocates ? The honest few among judiciary , bar , police & public service must uphold our constitution , rule of law & bring to book their corrupt colleagues. AN APPEAL TO HONOURABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF MANIPUR INDIA Dear Sir , INDIA: The officers who murdered Loitongbam Satish Singh and tortured Pebam Gunendro Singh in Manipur must be punished Names of victims: 1. Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh, aged about 35 years, son of late Mr. Sharat Singh, Singjamei Oinam Thingel, Singjamei, Imphal west District, Manipur 2. Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh, aged 44 years, son of late P. Ibomcha Singh, Haobam Marak Keisham Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur Name of alleged perpetrators: Officers attached to the Assam Rifles stationed at Yaingangpokpi Camp, Manipur state (identifiable by the 1st victim named above) Date of incident: From 16 May to 23 May 2009 Place of incident: Imphal, Manipur I am writing to express concern about the case of Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh, about 35-years-old, son of late Mr. Sharat Singh, Singjamei Oinam Thingel, Singjamei, Imphal west District, Manipur and Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh, about 44-years-old, son of late P. Ibomcha Singh, Haobam Marak Keisham Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur. I am informed that both Satish and Pebam were taken into custody by officers attached to the Assam Rifles, stationed at Yaingangpokpi Assam rifles camp in Manipur. I am aware that Satish and Pebam were taken into custody by the officers on mere suspicion. However I am gravely concerned by the details of detainment and torture both were subjected to while in custody, and appalled to discover that Satish was murdered in an allegedly fake encounter incident on 18 May. I am informed that by all probabilities, Satish was murdered by the officers, a fact borne out from the affidavit filed by Pebam at the office of the Additional Chief Secretary of Manipur state, which I have read. I am informed that Pebam was seriously threatened by the Assam Rifles officers before his release and that a false case has since been registered against him; that the officers have threatened Pebam with death should he disclose the facts to anyone upon release. For this very reason, he has requested for immediate security from the state government. I am also aware that this is not the first incident depicting the use of arbitrary force by the paramilitary officers stationed in Manipur; several civil society organisations inside and outside India and the United Nations have expressed concern about this to the government of India. I therefore request you to: 1. Ensure that a complete statement of Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh is recorded by the local police; 2. Launch an immediate investigation into the entire incident; 3. Provide Pebam with security pending the entire process of investigation and the possible prosecution of the perpetrators; 4. Arrange interim compensation for the family of Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh by the state. Your's sincerely, Nagaraj.M.R. AN APPEAL TO HONOUARABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF MEGHALAYA INDIA Dear Sir , INDIA: Police must guarantee the safety of human rights defender facing threats to life Name of victim: Ms. Hasina Kharbhih, Team Leader, Impulse NGO Network, Ranee's Abode, near Horse Shoe Building, Lower Lachumiere, Shillong--793001, Meghalaya state Name of alleged perpetrators: 1. Ms. Bethswa Dympep, accused in case number OC 9436337226 of Sardar Police Station, Shillong, Meghalaya Date of incident: 27 May 2009 Place of incident: Shillong, Meghalaya I am writing to express my concern about the threat to the life and security of Ms. Hasina Kharbhih, a noted human rights defender working against human trafficking. I am informed that Kharbhih has been contesting a criminal case against Ms. Bethswa Dympep at the local courts in Shillong and that since the beginning of the case Dympep has been threatening Kharbhih and her colleagues with personal harm and the closure of her office, demanding the withdrawal of the case from the court. However the police have not taken any action upon the complaint and have allowed Dympep to continue with her threats in private, and in the public eye. I am informed that on May 27 in particular, Kharbhih was verbally abused and assaulted by Dympep in front of the local court, and has filed a complaint at the Lumbiengri Police Station. The police failed to arrest Dympep on the excuse that they could not locate her, yet I am informed that after the incident the assailant had convened a press conference at the local press club, a public event which the local police were aware of. The lack of police action suggests that Dympep is using her influence to prevent the due process of law from taking its own course. In these circumstances, I request that you immediately take swift assertive action to ensure that Kharbhih remains safe throughout this trial and after, and that an investigation is ordered into the entire incident. I also request that if required, Dympep be taken into custody on the basis of the complaint filed by Kharbhih against her at Lumbiengri Police Station. Human rights defenders carry out a valuable and necessary service, often at the expense of their lives. Any government should give their safety utmost priority. Yours sincerely, Nagaraj.M.,R. Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE - 570017 INDIA … cell :09341820313 home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/ , http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/ , http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ , http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ , contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com