S.O.S e - Voice For
Justice - e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.13..Issue.14........08 / 04 / 2017
Editorial :
Corrupt judges , corrupt police THREAT
to our Motherland
- Cross Examination of Judges & Police
Honourable CJI , Union Home Secretary , Chief Justices , DG & IG of Police of all States , UTs FIRST
Answer following RTI
Questions
Corrupt Judges
, Corrupt Police are internal
enemies in our country and are greater threat than terrorists. Corrupt
Judges , Corrupt Police are
TRAITORS , ANTI NATIONALS. These
corrupt officials are causing
more damages to security , integrity of our country than
external enemies. These corrupt
officials are the ones who lend helping
hand directly or indirectly to external
enemies , terrorists. To protect our
motherland , these corrupt judges , corrupt police , corrupt public servants
must be severely dealt with first. Then external enemies can be tackled
with.
Our whole hearted
respects to honest
few working in
judiciary , police & public service. Our comments
are only directed towards
corrupt judges , corrupt police , corrupt public servants and the term “JUDGE” includes
all public officials performing judicial , quasi judicial functions.
Judges , Police are
NOT answering our following RTI
Questions NOR admitting our PILs since years. Both of
them are denying information
leading to crimes , covering up crimes. Thereby , both of them are aiding anti nationals , criminals. Who will prosecute these guilty judges &
police ?
Powers that be ,
cabinet ministers , judges are simply
sending my petitions to police , to ensure closure of files. In most of the cases police does not
have the power nor
jurisdiction and in the remaining
cases they need written legal sanction from president of india or
governor or from their ministry
head to legally
prosecute high &
mighty but legal
sanctions are not given.
Ultimate aim of the
judges , ministers , police
is to close
the file , to bury
the TRUTH. They
transfer the case to police
, so
that under the threat of khaki power
complainant becomes silent.
I have been
summoned to police
station tens of
times without legal
summons to give
statements , by the way I have
lost money , daily wages ,
transportation cost. No compensation for that
were paid to me. Rich , mighty
criminals were not even summoned once why ? Police
question commoners for
hours in some cases
even apply 3rd
degree TORTURE on common
people to get answers. Why
police are NOT
questioning rich , mighty
criminals , criminals within the police force & judiciary ,
why NOT
police are applying
3rd degree TORTURE on
those CRIMINAL POLICE
, JUDGEs to elicit truth
in national interest.
In courts of justice
, common people are subjected
to rigorous questioning
by prosecution , defense lawyers
and judges. In the same way
when you judges &
police themselves are in the dock
, why can not you be questioned to elicit truth in national interest. Are YOU
Judges & Police special , exceptions , above LAW ?
My petitions
have been transferred tens
of times to police whether
they have jurisdiction over it ,
whether they have legal sanction to enquire it or NOT. All the files were closed
by recording my statement
without any enquiry
of high , mighty criminals. We
need JUSTICE in
all the cases , before summoning me to police station
summon high , mighty criminals
to police station
FIRST , before questioning me
YOU Judges and
Police ANSWER our
questions FIRST , act
on our PILs
FIRST. We the public
want to know under who’s
behest you JUDGEs , POLICE are
burying the truth , cases , files , our
appeals.
Jai Hind. Vande
Mataram.
Your’s ,
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi.
Crimes by policemen, a matter of concern
By D V Guruprasad, ,
Former DG & IGP Karnataka
Sometime ago, when Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal made
a comment that “policemen are criminals in uniform”, there was outrage in the
Delhi Police. A similar comment made earlier by a judge resulted in similar
reactions.
Recent incidents in Bengaluru involving policemen, both
serving and retired, in criminal activities makes one feel that may be such
comments are not entirely unfounded. In the last week alone, Bengaluru police
arrested a retired deputy superintendent of police (DySP) and seven serving
policemen on charges of robbing businessmen post demonetisation drive.
Few years ago, some police officers in Mysuru allegedly
stopped a bus going to Kerala, detained a passenger and knocked off a huge
amount of cash he was carrying. On his complaint, an investigation was
conducted and some serving police officers were charged for the crime.
Earlier in the past, crimes alleged against police personnel
used to centre around their corrupt activities or custodial violence. We had
even heard of cases where stolen property recovered from the accused were
misappropriated by unscrupulous police officers.
However, policemen themselves planning and plotting
robberies and dacoities were rare indeed. The fact that such incidents are now
occurring frequently indicates that something is seriously wrong.
There is no easy answer to the question as to why policemen
turn criminals. Lure of quick and easy money, constant interaction with
criminals and inherent behavioural problems may be cited as some reasons.
But the larger question is how do such people get into the
police force in the first place? Is there no system to screen such people from
entering the system? Police recruitment does not have a system of identifying
potential wrong doers.
Usually physical efficiency test, written test and personal
interviews are held for selection. Police departments of five states are now
incorporating questions related to assessment of a person’s psychological
makeup into the written test.
But potential misfits are not flagged and removed based on
their answers. In personal interviews of police sub-inspectors in Karnataka, a
psychologist is part of the interview board. But no candidate seems to have
been rejected based on the psychologist’s assessment.
Since it is difficult to prevent a person with criminal mind
in getting selected into the police wing, it is incumbent upon police top
bosses to inculcate values during induction training. While some states have
introduced ethics as one of the subjects for police training, many still
concentrate on subjects like law and police duties.
It is also a well-known that police training does not get
the importance it deserves. Hence even at this stage, undesirable persons do
not usually get weeded out.
If a person with a criminal mind manages to get selected and
gets confirmed in the police force, the only way to make him pursue a path of
law is by constant supervision. It is a pity there are no periodical
assessments to gauge the mental makeup of a police constable or a
sub-inspector.
The department normally goes by whatever is written by
seniors in the Annual Appraisal Reports (ARRs). More often, these reports are
written routinely. In the armed forces or in the central police forces, an
assessment of a person’s performance and mental makeup is periodically made and
black sheep are mercilessly weeded out.
As per the data of the National Crime Research Bureau
(NCRB), the total number of criminal cases registered against policemen were
1,989 in 2013; 2,600 in 2014 and 5,526 in 2015. Of these 5,526 cases, Kerala
itself accounted for 3,080 cases, whereas Karnataka reported only 84 cases.
Considering that people in general do not make complaints against policemen in
India, this figure is alarming.
Rare punishments
Out of the 5,526 cases, 4,367 cases were charge sheeted and
in 1,512 cases police personnel were arrested. However, the total number of
police personnel convicted is only 25. These figures indicate that wrongdoers
rarely get punished.
Can such crimes be stopped? The answer is ‘no’. There will
be black sheep in the department. However, such crimes can be minimised.
This can be done by screening the applicants for police jobs
by using well established psychometric tests, instilling strong sense of values
during training and having periodic refresher training courses, taking strict
action including dismissing from the service against those with criminal bent
of mind and constantly monitoring the activities of at least those police men
who come to adverse notice.
Whistle blowers in the department need to be encouraged and
protected. Efforts should be made to see that those police men charge sheeted
for serious crimes do not escape punishment.
Merely having a Police Complaints Authority in every state does
not solve the problem. A system of policing the police needs to be introduced.
If police leaders do not sit up and take corrective measures, the situation
will go out of hand.
CRIMINALS IN POLICE UNIFORM
- An appeal to union home minister & Karnataka state
home minister
The ABC of police force in India is apathy ,
brutality & corruption . in India, police are not
impartially enforcing
law instead are working as hand maidens of rich &
mighty. The corrupt
police officers are collecting protection money from
criminals ,
collecting money to go slow on investigations , to file B-
reports , to
fix innocents in fake cases , to murder innocents in lock-up
/
encounters . they are hand in league with land mafia , today
C.M of
Karnataka himself issued a warning to police officials about
this.
Even in lock-ups , jails, the rich inmates bribe
officials get better food from outside , mobile phones ,
drugs , drinks
, cigareetes , etc. they get spacious cells & get best private
medical
care . where as the poor inmates are even denied food ,
health care ,
living space as per the provisions of law. The corrupt jail
officials
instigate rowdy elements in the jails to assault poor
inmates & to toe
their line. More corrupt the police more wealthier he is.
Even CBI
officials are no different. The only beacon of hope is still
there are
few honest people left in the police force.
Hereby , e-voice urges you to make public the following
information in the interest of justice.
1.how many CBI officials & Karnataka state police
officials are facing
charges of corruption , 3rd degree torture ,
lock-up/encounter deaths
, rapes , fake cases , etc ?
2.how you are monitoring the ever increasing wealth of
corrupt police
officials?
3.how many officials from the ranks of constable to DGP have
amassed
illegal wealth?
4.what action you have taken in these cases ? have you got
reinvestigated all the cases handled by tainted police?
5.how many policemen have been awarded death penalty &
hanged till
death , for cold blooded murders in the form of lock-up
deaths /
encounter deaths ?
6.why DGP of Karnataka is not registering my complaint dt
10/12/2004 ,
subsequent police complaints ?
is it because rich & mighty are involved ?
7.e - voice is ready to bring to book corrupt police
officials subject to
conditions, are you ready ?
8.how many police personnel are charged with violations of
people's
human rights & fundamental rights ?
9.how many STF police deployed to nab veerappan were
themselves
charged with theft of forest wealth?
10.how you are ensuring the safety , health , food , living
space of
inmates in jails?
11.how you are ensuring the medical care , health of
prisoners in
hospitals & mental asylums?
12.How you are ensuring the safety , health , food , living
space of
inmates in juvenile homes ?
Ten reasons why criminals in khaki get away
Behind every man like S.P.S. Rathore who abuses his
authority stand the generals and footsoldiers who help and support him. We need
to take them all down.
S.P.S. Rathore, the criminal former top cop of Haryana, may
appear alone today but we must never forget that he was able to get away with
the sexual molestation of a young child and the illegal harassment of her
family for 19 years because he had hundreds of men who supported him in his
effort to evade justice.
The fact that these men – fellow police officers,
bureaucrats, politicians, lawyers, judges, school administrators – were willing
to bend the system to accommodate a man accused of molesting a minor speaks
volumes for the moral impoverishment of our establishment and country. Decent
societies shun those involved in sexual offences against children. Even
criminals jailed for ‘ordinary’ crimes like murder treat those serving time for
molesting children as beyond the pale. But in India, men like Rathore have
their uses for their masters, so the system circles its wagons and protects
them.
The CBI’s appeal may lead to the enhancement of Rathore’s
sentence and perhaps even the slapping of abetment to suicide charges, since
his young victim killed herself to put an end to the criminal intimidation her
family was being subjected to by Rathore and his men. But the systemic rot
which the case has exposed will not be remedied unless sustained public
pressure is put on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Union Home Minister P.
Chidambaram, two men who have it in their power to push for simple remedies in
the way the Indian law enforcement and justice delivery system works.
First, abolish the need for official, i.e. political
sanction to prosecute bureaucrats, policemen and security forces personnel when
they are accused of committing crimes. The original intent behind this built-in
stay-out-of-jail card was to protect state functionaries from acts done in the
course of discharging their duties in good faith. Somewhere along the line,
this has come to mean protecting our custodians of law and order when they
murder innocent civilians (eg. the infamous Panchalthan case in Kashmir where
the trial of army men indicted by the CBI for murdering five villagers in 2000
still cannot take place because the Central government will not grant
permission), or assault or molest women and children. No civilised, democratic
society grants such impunity. It is disgusting to see former officials and
bureaucrats from Haryana saying how they had wanted Rathore prosecuted but were
prevented from doing so because of pressure. Such officials should either be
made formally to testify in a criminal case against the politicians who so
pressured them or they should themselves be hauled up for perverting the course
of justice.
Second, stop talking about how making the police and army
answerable to the law will somehow demoralise their morale. Does anybody care
about the morale of ordinary citizens any more? Or the morale of upright police
and army officers, who do not think it is right for their colleagues to be able
to get away with criminal acts?
Third, bring an end to the cosy relationship between the
police and politicians. Rathore was protected by four chief ministers of
Haryana. He served them and they served him by ensuring his unfettered rise. It
is absurd that the Indian Police is still governed by a colonial-era Act dating
back to 1861. A number of commissions have made recommendations for reforming
the police over the years; but no government or political party wants to give
up its ability to use and misuse the police for their own benefit.
Fourth, ensure that police officers who abuse their
authority and engage in mala fide prosecutions are dismissed from service and
sentenced to jail for a long period of time. Mr. Chidambaram should use the
considerable resources at his command to find out who were the policemen
involved in filing 11 bogus cases against the teenaged brother of the young
girl Rathore molested. He should then make sure criminal proceedings are
initiated against all of them. The message must go out to every policeman in
the country: If you abuse the law at the behest of a superior, you will suffer
legal consequences.
Fifth, ensure that criminal charges against law enforcement
personnel are fast-tracked as a matter of routine so that a powerful defendant
is not able to use his position to delay proceedings the way Rathore did for
years on end. The destruction or disappearance of material evidence in such
cases must be treated as a grave offence with strict criminal liability imposed
on the individual responsible for breaking the chain of custody.
Sixth, empower the National Human Rights Commission with
teeth so that police departments and state governments cannot brush aside their
orders as happened in the Rathore case. This would also require appointing to
the NHRC women and men who have a proven record of defending human rights in
their professional life, something that is done today only in the breach. The
attitude of the Manmohan Singh government to this commission and others like
the National Commission for Women (NCW) and National Commission for Minorities
is shocking. Vacancies are not filled for months on end.
Seventh, ensure the early enactment of pending legislation
broadening the ambit of sexual crimes, including sexual crimes against
children. Between rape, defined as forced penetrative sex, and the vague,
Victorian-era crime of ‘outraging the modesty of a woman’, the Indian Penal
Code recognises no other form of sexual violence. As a result, all forms of
sexual molestation and assault short of rape attract fairly lenient punishment,
of the kind Rathore got. In his case, the judge did not even hand down the
maximum sentence, citing concerns for the criminal’s age. Sadly, he did not
take into account the age of the victim and neither does the IPC, which fails
to distinguish between ‘outraging the modesty’ of an adult woman and a young
child.
A draft law changing these provisions and bringing India
into line with the rest of the modern world has been pending with the NCW and Law
Ministry for years. Perhaps the government may now be shamed into pushing it
through Parliament at the earliest.
Eighth, take steps to introduce a system of protection of
witnesses and complainants. The fate that the family of Rathore’s young victim
had to endure is testament to the fact that people who seek justice in India do
so at their own peril.
Ninth, ensure that robust interrogation techniques like
narco-analysis, which are routinely used against other alleged criminals, are
also employed against police officers accused of crimes.
Tenth, the media and the higher judiciary must also turn the
light inward and ask themselves whether they were also derelict in their duty.
The Rathore case did not attract the kind of constant media attention it
deserved, nor do other cases involving serving police officers accused of
crimes against women, workers, peasants and minorities. As for the upper
courts, their record is too patchy to inspire confidence. It was, after all,
the high court which chose to disregard the CBI’s request for including
abetment to suicide charges.
To,
Shri Justice T S
Thakur ,
Honourable Chie Justice of India ,
No.5 , Krishna Menon Marg ,
New Delhi – 110011.
Honourable Sir,
Subject : Honourable Chief Justice of India Resign from judicial service
Read the following
articles it shows the ugly face ,
criminal face of Indian Police &
Indian Judges. Ofcourse , there are
honest few in police service & judiciary , but their numbers are dwindling day by day. Their
voices are muted. A crime can happen without the knowledge of police
, but a crime cann’t continue for years
without the knowledge , connivance of local police.
Inspite of repeated
appeals , show cause notices
by our publication to you , you have not replied let alone take
action. You & your office staff lack
decorum , etiquette , duty
consciousness of replying
to letters. You are making contempt of citizens of
india. But remember the basic fact that you are enjoying 5 star pay , perks at the expense of public.
Throughout this petition & in our past appeals , the term “JUDGE” includes
all public servants right
from revenue inspector , officials performing quasi judicial functions right up to chief justice of india.
In the following articles we have clearly shown how
justice is delayed &
justice manipulated in
india. SCI & CJI is not even bothered about health conditions
, life of applicants. I am
suffering from health problems caused
by my previous occupation
at M/s RPG Cables Ltd and am in my final days ,
authorities , SCI , CJI
is not bothered to give justice inspite of my repeated appeals for
more than a decade.
Following two examples , actual cases highlighting
the judicial delays :
1. In Mysore ideal Jawa Factory , company was locked
out. Huge amounts were outstanding to
banks , suppliers , employees. The land
usage , alienation could have been converted from industrial use to
commercial to get higher market
price and then auctioned. We appealed for same to authorities including SCI , but they didn’t
heed. It was auctioned off for lesser
price , proceeds earned was far less
to fully
pay outstanding amounts to banks , suppliers and employees. They were
only paid less amounts , thus public
banks , suppliers , employees were cheated of
their rightful dues. Afterwards the new buyer got the
alienation , converted it from industrial
use to commercial usage , demolished factory building built huge residential
complex and earned crores of rupees profit.
2. In mysore BEML
quarters lake &
Hebbal lake are
encroached. In the beginning itself , I have appealed to authorities , SCI
, CJI to stop the encroachments. District magistrate at that time threatened
me. Even some citizens groups led protest marches. Nobody was botherd.
Today both lakes are encroached , huge
buildings , factories are functioning.
It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard
the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since
25 years I am appealing
to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national
security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights
, human rights are repeatedly violated
but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically
, after these appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts
on my life were made , physically
assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed , press
accreditation denied , received
threatening calls , blank calls, even to
date rough elements follow us , rough
elements scout near home at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties between rough
elements & SCI Judges ?
Mr.T.S.Thakur , You personally as CJI is
responsible for protection of our whole family & must ensure protection of
our whole family. Please don’t send
police once again to our home , they lack
practical powers , failed previously to enquire high & mighty. They are
only interested in taking my statement & closing the case. I have given
enough statements to police , IB. Based
on those statements , a supreme court monitored
CBI enquiry is appropriate, to prosecute corrupt public servants.
1. Why not police are given enough powers to summon
, enquire high & mighty VVIPs ? Why
my decade old complaint to DGP is not acted upon ?
2. Why the
enquiry of higher executive in M/s RBI Curreny Note Press (BRBNMPL) ,
PES Engineering College , NIE , RPG Cables , Mysore District Court is not done ? These people illegally denied
me job opportunities under the behest of
criminals , if they are enquired they will point to the criminal behind.
3. Why the
enquiry of concerned judges is not made , who are denying information
and delaying to act upon our PILs , under whose behest ? If enquired
these judges will spill the beans about
criminals behind.
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given
above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly
called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the
losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc
must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel
repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station
for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police
station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of
one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job ,
meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical
care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue officials , District
Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned accused
public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake
charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me ,
this complaint is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our
fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves ,
If anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural
deaths , etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members - In
such case Mr.T.S.Thakur , Chief Justice
of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will
be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay
Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is
eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated
to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as
land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police
officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty Constitutional
fuctionaries.
You are delaying
taking action with
respect to PILs , appeals made by us
concerning public welfare , national security, loss to public exchequer
, etc. Where as courts have enough time
to hear trivial cases
of cricket boards , etc.
When you
cann’t work without fear or favour of criminals
inside & outside government , you are unfit
for the post . Your continuation in office
only serves your self interest not the country. Hereby , we request you to RESIGN from the position of chief justice of india and to pave
the way for may be to a person
who can work , uphold law. But you
can still continue in office as a burden
on public exchequer ,
society as some of the previous CJIs did.
We are witnessing
unfit people being selected as
judges by collegiums , public service
commissions. Till rot in
judiciary is cleared , judges
lack moral , legal right to prosecute , punish others. Only when
we have honest persons in judiciary , police service then alone
we can clean criminals in
judiciary , police service , government.
Then alone we will get RAM RAJYA
, a just society envisioned
by our constitution
framers.
Against common people
, you
judges make harsh comments ,
strict enforcement of law , police
cruelly treat commoners , use 3rd degree torture
on commoners. Whereas against
rich crooks , mafia
you judges & police fail , lack spine
to uphold law.
You are zeroes before rich
crooks , valor of judges , police is
only before commoners. Still
if you have little sense
of duty take
action on following
PILs , previous appeals for
justice by us , reply to our
show cause notices , issue
writ of mandamus to
concerned public servants to
give full truthful
information to our
following & previous RTI applications.
You have failed in your constitutional duties as Chief
Justice of India. It will be better if you resign from judicial services
immediately, it will be good for the society
the nation as a whole. or else you can continue in service as a burden
on the public exchequer , the society as
some of previous CJIs did.
Still now also you can change your work style and
sincerely do your duties upholding rule
of law IMPARTIALLY. Please read the details at
following web pages :
Justice Thakur RESIGN
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/justice-t-s-thakur-resign
,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/supreme-court-apologise-to-public ,
Rot in judiciary is decades old. Honourable CJI sir ,
weeping is not right constitution of india has given you the authority , TAKE ACTION DO YOUR
DUTY. People , History will remember you
forever with respect. Anyway you are getting very good 5 star pay & perks ,
will also get decent pension after retirement from government. First forget about post retirement postings , discretionary allotment of sites ,
etc from government then you can work fearlessly. Both central & state
governments are biggest litigants in the
country , IAS babus make wrong application , interpretation of laws leading to litigations. Start by clearing the
rotten eggs within the judiciary. When judiciary & police in a country strictly uphold law , work
impartially that country surpasses even
heaven.
Do remember on the D Day , in the Court of Almighty everybody CJI , Judges , prime ministers ,
common man alike has to bow his head. In
who’s court there is no match fixing ,
no technicalities , no vociferous hi fi advocates , no bias based on caste ,
religion , region , community , etc , only
straight simple account of wrongs & rights. Guess his judgement in your case. GOD BLESS US
ALL.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Date :
07.07.2016………………..Your’s sincerely ,
Place : Mysuru………………………..Nagaraja.M.R.
Karnataka DySP hangs self after being suspended for
kidnapping, extortion
Kalappa Handibag, deputy superintendent of police (DySP) of
Chikkamagaluru Rural in Karnataka, committed suicide on Tuesday by hanging
after he was suspended from duty for his alleged connection in the case of
abduction and extortion of a financier.
Relatives of his wife, Vidya, claimed that Kallappa
committed suicide around 8.30 a.m. when his wife was in the bathroom. He was
subsequently rushed to the Muragod Primary Health Centre and then referred to
KLE Hospital in Belagavi. However, doctors at the hospital declared him brought
dead, as reported by the Hindu.
Handibag's suspension was issued after a departmental
inquiry was ordered against him, following a complaint by 37-year-old resident
of Kempanahalli, Thejas, who alleged that Kalappa was one of the six men who
abducted him and tortured and extorted money from him.
As disclosed by Thejas in the FIR, he was picked up by a
gang of six men around 2 a.m. on June 28 when he was parking the car near his
house. He was shoved into a Scorpio (KA 20 N 3657) and taken to an old
warehouse in Bengaluru, where he was thrashed by the gangsters who also
demanded a ransom of Rs. 25 lakh.
The gangsters told Thejas that he was being punished for
duping people through his chit fund business and cricket betting. Thejas
negotiated the ransom down to Rs. 10 lakh and called his friend identified as
Shivu or Pavan to follow the kidnapper's instructions and deliver the money.
Thejas's friend was then given a mobile number (9480805120)
and a voice from the other line asked him to deliver the cash to the police
quarters behind Mathias Tower on IG Road. Thejas was eventually freed.
DySP Handibag's role came to light after Thejas and his friend
used the car's registration number and the mobile number to investigate the
kidnapping. Thejas's friend also recorded the mobile conversation with
Handibag, according to a report by the Times of India.
Covert op on Dawood compromised by some Mumbai cops: RK
Singh
Noting that Dawood
and Lashkar-e-Taiba chief Hafiz Saeed were protected by Pakistani forces, Singh
said a secret operation must be carried out in the manner the United States did
to kill terrorists Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar.
India had planned a covert operation to take down underworld
don Dawood Ibrahim, but the operation was compromised by some Mumbai Police
officials. These are the explosive revelations made by former Home Secretary
and now BJP leader RK Singh in an interview to Seedhi Baat on Aaj Tak.
RK Singh revealed details of how corrupt elements of the
Mumbai Police foiled a secret operation to take down Dawood. The operation was
launched when Atal Bihari Vajpayee was the prime minister and current NSA Ajit
Doval was at the IB. Indian government had roped in some elements from the
Chota Rajan gang and they were being trained at a secret location outside
Maharashtra. But Mumbai Police officials who were in touch with D-company
landed up at the training camp with arrest warrants for the covert operatives
who had been engaged by India. The entire operation to take down Dawood failed
due to these rogue elements in Mumbai police. This is the first time that there
is confirmation of a botched covert operation to take down Dawood by someone
who has held a position of authority.
Noting that Dawood and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) chief Hafiz
Saeed were protected by Pakistani forces, Singh said a secret operation must be
carried out in the manner the United States did to kill terrorists Osama bin Laden
and Mullah Omar. He added that Pakistan will never admit that Dawood is in
Pakistan. Similarly, it will shamelessly deny the presence of other terrorists
despite funding and training these terror groups on its soil. "India must
repeat the Myanmar operation in Pakistan," he maintained. He added if one
operation fails, the government shouldn't be disheartened but launch another
operation right away.
Singh said Modi's advisors are not giving him the right
advice on this issue. "Nothing will be achieved by handing over dossiers
to Pakistan. It is globally recognised as a snake pit. We can't depend on the
US to fight India's battles. India has to fight its own enemies," Singh
added.
Singh also said the neighbouring country needs to be wise
and avert a possible war by not shielding a terrorist. "Pakistan has to
calculate the cost of a war. I don't think Pakistan is such a big fool that it
would engage in a war with India," he said. "If America sees any
threat from Pakistan, it will act. Similarly, Israel can kill its enemies. We
need to develop this mentality," he added. The retired bureaucrat revealed
that specially-trained private security men comprising mostly ex-army men
protect Dawood in Pakistan under the supervision of the ISI. Singh exuded
confidence that Modi's visit to the UAE would yield desirable results. He did
acknowledge though that Dawood still has significant influence in Dubai.
Coming down heavily on Pakistan, Singh said India must stop
dialogue with its neighbor and instead deal with the situation in a strategic
manner. "India must hit back in a way that hurts Pakistan the most,"
he said while suggesting that the dialogue process only helps Pakistan restore
credibility which it has lost all over the world. "Pakistan believes in a
constant war with India. We have the capability to hit back hard. Any dialogue
with Pakistan is futile. For a discredited country like Pakistan, dialogue
process is an opportunity to regain its credibility and strike parity with
India," Singh said. He said the elected government in the neighbouring
country had no control over its military force and the ISI.
Singh lauded the central government's firm stand on
separatists in Kashmir. He said the Pakistani government was using separatists
to claim in international platform that it has the support of a section of
people in Jammu and Kashmir. The Indian government has done the right thing by
not talking to separatists, he said.
Lottery Scam: Retired IPS officer who introduced Alok Kumar to Pari Rajan was major
beneficiary
An IPS officer who retired in 2010 is said to be the major
beneficiary of the single-digit lottery racket that was unearthed recently. If
sources are to be believed then it is this retired officer who had held several
positions in the Bengaluru City Police Commissionerate, who introduced the
kingpin of the lottery racket, Pari Rajan, to fellow IPS officer Alok Kumar.
The investigation carried out by the CID has indicated that
the retired IPS officer was one of the biggest beneficiaries in the scam and
his name figured in the list of 12 serving/ retired IPS officers whom the CID
intended to summon for interrogation, the sources said.
Alok Kumar, too, is said have disclosed the name of the
officer, when he was grilled by the CID on Sunday.
There are also reports that Rajan, a native of KGF was into
hawala transactions and this was a major reason why many officers had links
with him.
The suspicion is that Rajan used his contacts with the
police top brass to ensure a safe hawala transaction. Hawala operators considered
Bengaluru as a safe transit point and it had a well-oiled network.
With the CBI probe being ordered, there are possibilities of
various aspects relating to lottery scam and hawala business to come out.
The Excise and Lottery Enforcement Cell was set up
immediately after the ban on the lottery business in 2007.
For the first two years, the cell had no station or power to
arrest. One of the senior officers, who was in the Enforcement Cell between
2007 and 2010, said that until 2011 there wasn’t much illegal lottery business
reported from across the State.
“Matka and single-number lottery were very much in
existence, but they used to be handled by the respective district police. As
far as lottery was concerned, there was no case registered at least till
2009-10,” an official said.
Two More Senior Cops Involved In Racket, Says Kumaraswamy
with Pari Rajan. The police have recently arrested Rajan in
connection with the scam. Arun Chakravarthy, who was IGP, Lottery Squad, prior
to Agrawal, had also taken bribe, he charged. According to Kumaraswamy, 30 to
40 senior police officers, including many IPS officers, are involved in the
scam. Despite a TV channel conducting a sting operation in March this year, the
government took no action for two months. During this period, the ruling party
MLC took Pari Rajan and Matrin to the son of the influential person to strike a
deal. When Martin and Rajan refused to pay Rs 100 crore, the scam gradually
came out in the open, he said. Paying hafta The JD(S) leader said suspended
police officer Dharanesh (who was then Superintendent of Police, Lottery Squad,
southern range) and Pari Rajan had been paying hafta (bribe) to a minister in
the Siddaramaiah ministry. Dharanesh was recently suspended in connection with
the lottery scam. The officer wanted to continue in the post. The then
Superintendent of Police, Lottery Squad, northern range, Chandrakanth was
trying to get the post held by Dharanesh, he said. "The chief minister and
Home Minister K J George should now disclose the name of the minister who was
collecting the hafta. He should tell why Pari Rajan was not arrested all these
days." Simmering differences He said the scam emerged due to the simmering
differences among the police officers in sharing the bribe money paid by the
mafia. Two cases filed initially in KGF in connection with the illegal lottery
sale were fake and they were only meant to cover up the scam, he added. Later
speaking to the media after the chief minister's decision to refer the scam to
the CBI, Kumaraswamy said the government should get ready to face more
embarrassment. However, he welcomed the decision to refer the racket to the
CBI. Scam chronicle, according to HDK A constable in Kolar, Manjunath, was
regularly taking bribe from Pari Rajan during June or July 2014. Rajan stopped
giving him money after he developed contacts among higher-ups. Manjunath
informs about illegal activities of Rajan to Singh, a head constable with
anti-lottery squad. Singh, brings the matter to the notice of Ramappa Guttedar,
the inspector of the squad. When questioned, Rajan he offers big money as
bribe. Then he takes these policemen to Chennai where they meet one Martin, one
of the key operators. Martin gives Rs 40 lakh as bribe and the three policemen
sincerely inform about it to lottery squad SP Dharanesh and IGP Arun
Chakravarthy. All the policemen share the money: Manjunath and Singh get Rs two
lakh each, Ramappa gets Rs five lakh and the rest was shared by Dharanesh and
Chakravarthy. Upset with the small share they got, Manjunath and Singh inform
about the illegality to northern range SP Chandrakanth. Chandrakanth tries to
get the post held by Dharanesh but fails. He then helps a TV news channel to
conduct a sting operation. Six cases referred to CBI by Siddaramaiah government
Misappropriation of over Rs nine crore by the officials of
Ramanagaram-Channapatna Urban Development Authority with the support of bank
officials in 2013. Misuse of over Rs five crore by the officials of Mandya
Urban Development n Authority with the help of banks in 2013. Officers of many
nationalised banks were said to be involved in the irregularity. Rape and
murder of Sowjanya, a 17-year-old pre-university course student of SDM College,
Ujire in Dakshina Kannada, on October 9, 2012. The theft of 12 historic idols
from Siddhanta Darshan Block of a Jain Basadi at Moodbidri in September 2013.
Death of IAS officer D K Ravi in April, 2015. Single-digit lottery scam. H D
Kumaraswamy, JD(S) leader: The chief minister and Home Minister K J George should
now disclose the name of the minister who was collecting the hafta. He should
tell why Pari Rajan was not arrested all these days.
DGP son has links with Lokayukta scam accused kin
State police chief Omprakash’s son, Karthikesh Omprakash,
has business relations with the kin of N Narasimha Murthy, a clerk at the State
police headquarters, who has been arrested by the SIT probing the Lokayukta
corruption scam.
Documents available with the Deccan Herald show that
Murthy's brother-in-law Ashwath and Karthikesh are partners in a quarrying and
crusher unit in Ramanagara. Incidentally, a complaint by the villagers of
Hanchikuppe in Ramanagara district against this quarrying firm for violation of
rules is still pending before the Upalokayukta.
The application for quarrying and stone crushing unit was
filed in the name of Karthikesh in 2009. The Mining Licence (Number 1354 and
1353) was issued in favour of the firm Magadi Quarry and Crusher, owned by
Karthikesh and Ashwath. Around five acres of gomala land at Hanchikuppe was
allotted to the firm.
When villagers objected to the quarrying unit within the
prescribed safe zone, a proceeding by the Ramanagara Deputy Commissioner held
on March 1, 2013 relaxed certain conditions. The area was declared as safe
zone. The same day, based on the recommendation of the DC, Karnataka State
Pollution Control Board accorded certification for the safe zone. The decision
was so fast that both the offices passed orders in favour of a quarry owner in
just one day, the documents reveal. Despite this, the Tahshildar had submitted
a report that the unit fell within 500 metres of residential area, which is not
permissable under Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011.
The Hanchikuppe villagers had also filed a PIL in the High
Court. The court dismissed the petition on the grounds that since the villagers
are the concerned parties a PIL cannot be entertained. The villagers also filed
a complaint before the Upalokayukta (Compt/Uplok/BD/459/2011) and the next date
of hearing is September 23, 2015.
On the day Omprakash took charge as DG&IGP, Loksatta
Party had complained to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah that he had prima facie
misused his position to get clearances for the unit owned by his son.
When contacted, Omprakash said that it was a personal
business issue of his son. Asked if he is aware of his son's business
partnership with the brother-in-law of a clerk in his office, the DG&IGP
answered in the negative.
“You have to ask this question to my son. He may have a
business relationship with a private person. Moreover, if it is illegal, let
the law take its own course,'' he said.
Karnataka Lokayukta Bhaskar Rao’s son held in ‘extortion’
racket
The arrest of Ashwin Rao was made in Hyderabad, as the SIT,
formed to probe the alleged racket that has also led to clamour for the
resignation of Bhaskar Rao, intensified the investigation
A special investigation team (SIT) of Karnataka police,
which is probing an extortion racket in the state Lokayukta, Monday arrested
Ashwin Rao, son of Lokayukta Justice Y Bhaskar Rao and the prime accused in the
case.
Ashwin was arrested from Kukatpally near Hyderabad.
“On Monday morning, we picked up Ashwin from his
residence,”a senior SIT official said. An advocate for Ashwin, who moved an
anticipatory bail plea in a special Lokayukta court after his client was
detained, was informed in court by the SIT investigating officer Labhu Ram
about the arrest.
Ashwin is prime accused in an extortion case filed by a
government executive engineer, M N Krishnamurthy, who has alleged that Ashwin
demanded a Rs 1 crore bribe from him to prevent initiation of corruption
proceedings against him.
The SIT, however, informed the special court Monday that
Ashwin had not been arrested in connection with Krishnamurthy’s complaint, but
in a fresh extortion complaint against him by P B Channabasappa, a government
executive engineer involved with the Upper Tunga irrigation project in Haveri
district.
“It is not clear how the arrest could have happened in the
second FIR because the SIT was in Hyderabad early on Monday and the second FIR
was filed around 10.30 am. The anticipatory bail plea in the Krishnamurthy case
is still valid if the arrest is in the second case. The SIT has been asked to
file objections to the anticipatory bail plea,” Ashwin’s advocate Sandeep Patil
said.
SIT sources indicated that Ashwin would be placed under
arrest in the Krishnamurthy case as well after he is brought to Bengaluru
Tuesday.
The SIT has so far arrested five people in connection with
the case.
The alleged racket had multiple layers, with one group
filing RTIs to identify allegedly corrupt persons as targets, a second group
calling up officials and summoning them to the Lokayukta offices, and a third
group allegedly demanding money to prevent initiation of cases against them.
On Sunday, the SIT had arrested the public relations officer
in the Lokayukta, Syed Riyazatullah, a police officer of the rank of joint
commissioner, on charges of extortion and cheating.
Riyazatullah was produced in court Monday and remanded in
SIT custody till August 5. The court overruled his bail plea, saying there was
need for effective investigation in the case.
Karnataka extortion case: Lokayukta’s son part of larger
conspiracy, says SIT
Ashwin Rao alias Yerabati Ashwin has been arrested by a SIT
in connection with an attempt to extort money from a government official in the
Lokayukta.
The SIT in its objections has stated that Ashwin Rao
“misused the premises and office of the Lokayukta and meeting hall adjacent to
the chambers of PRO of Lokayukta” as part of the alleged extortion conspiracy.
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) which arrested
Karnataka Lokayukta Justice Y Bhaskar Rao’s son Ashwin Rao in an extortion case
stated on Monday that he is a prominent member of a larger conspiracy.
Ashwin Rao alias Yerabati Ashwin has been arrested by a SIT
in connection with an attempt to extort money from a government official in the
Lokayukta. The SIT objected to an anticipatory bail plea filed by Ashwin Rao to
pre-empt his arrest in a second extortion case.
The SIT in its objections has stated that Ashwin Rao
“misused the premises and office of the Lokayukta and meeting hall adjacent to
the chambers of PRO of Lokayukta” as part of the alleged extortion conspiracy.
The call detail records obtained during investigations “clearly establishes”
that Rao was in constant touch with three other key accused in the extortion
racket – middlemen V Bhaskar and Ashok Kumar and Lokayukta PRO Syed
Riyazathullah, the SIT has stated.
According to the SIT, though Ashwin Rao has been arrested
only in connection with an extortion attempt on one government official, his
arrest in a second case is likely at any time. “Considering the fact that
petitioner is the son of the Hon’ble Lokayukta and he is in a position to wield
influence on the prosecution witnesses he in not entitled to anticipatory
bail,” the SIT has argued. The SIT has also claimed to have unearthed
incriminating material against Ashwin Rao in the course of a search of his
house in Hyderabad.
While a case was initially registered against Ashwin Rao and
others for summoning Bengaluru Urban district executive engineer M N
Krishnamurthy to the Lokayukta office on May 4, 2015 to place a demand for a
bribe of Rs one crore to prevent initiation of Lokayukta corruption proceedings
the son of the Lokayukta was eventually arrested by the SIT in connection with
another case registered on the basis of a complaint by an irrigation department
engineer PB Channabasappa who alleged that Ashwin Rao and others demanded Rs 20
lakh to make a Lokayukta corruption case go away.
The SIT has in other statements of objection to bail
applications said that cell tower analysis had revealed that three of the
middlemen, including realtor Ashok Kumar who allegedly made the telephone call
summoning executive engineer Krishnamurthy to the Lokayukta office were
together on May 4 when the government official was called to the Lokayukta’s
office. The trio of middlemen were also frequently in touch with the Lokayukta
PRO and Justice Bhaskar Rao’s son Ashwin Rao, the SIT has stated.
The SIT also informed the special Lokayukta court that
middlemen Ashok Kumar and Shankare Gowda, and Lokakyukta PRO Riyazathullah had
destroyed crucial evidence including some SIM cards and mobile handsets used in
the conspiracy.
Gali Reddy cash-for-bail scam nets two more Andhra judges
More skeletons are tumbling out of the closet in the
cash-forbail scam involving former Karnataka minister Gali Janardhan Reddy.
On Thursday, the anti-corruption bureau (ACB) arrested two
more judges who allegedly made parallel attempts to secure bail for the mining
baron in the Obulapuram Mining Company's illegal mining case.
The two judges - D. Prabhakar Rao, a family court judge in
Srikakulam and K. Lakshminarasimha Rao, the chief judge of the city small
causes court, were taken into custody by the agency from their respective
residences in Hyderabad.
While Prabhakar Rao was suspended by the Andhra Pradesh High
Court on July 6, Lakshminarasimha Rao was suspended late on Wednesday, after
the ACB probe unearthed his role in the scam.
The ACB authorities are questioning him. The ACB had already
arrested suspended CBI special court judge Talluri Pattabhirama Rao, who had
allegedly received a bribe for granting bail to the former Karnataka minister
on May 11.
Retired judge T.V. Chalapathi Rao, who mediated in the
cash-for-bail deal, has also been arrested. Pattabhi's son Ravichandra, rowdy
sheeter-turned-realtor P. Yadagiri Rao and realtor Ravi Suryaprakash Babu were
arrested and remanded in judicial custody.
According to the ACB sources, the former Karnataka minister
and mining baron had approached Pattabhi through two different routes: one
involving Chalapathi Rao and Yadagiri; and the other through Lakshminarasimha
Rao and Prabhakar Rao.
While Yadagiri offered Rs5 crore to Pattabhi, Prabhakar
offered to strike the deal for Rs10 crore. However, Pattabhi preferred
Yadagiri's offer because it was a safer deal as Chalapathi happened to be his
friend.
Janardhan Reddy was arrested on September 5, 2011, by the
CBI. He is accused of being involved in the illegal mining and export of iron
ore in Bellary and Anantapur.
Rs 100cr offered for Gali Janardhan Reddy’s bail: Arrested
judge
More skeletons are tumbling out in the murky cash-for-bail
scam involving mining baron and former Karnataka minister Gali Janardhan Reddy
as a lower court judge, arrested in the case, disclosed to the ACB that Gali's
men were ready to offer as much as a staggering Rs 100 crore to secure bail for
him. Earlier, the deal amount was put at Rs 15 crore.
T Lakshminarasimha Rao, the arrested judge, disclosed that
Dasaradharami Reddy, a relative of Gali, had made the Rs 100 crore offer,
according to the confession statement recorded by the ACB. Krishna Prasad, an
auditor, who is known to him and another relative M Venkateswara Rao approached
Lakshminarasimha Rao in the second week of April with a request to look for a
`channel' to influence the CBI judge for Gali's release on bail. "They
were in touch with Dasaradharami Reddy who was willing to pay even Rs 100 crore
for securing the bail," the confession statement of Rao said. Though the
deal initially came as a shock to the arrested judge, who at the time was
registrar (enquiries), high court, he was later attracted towards the deal, it
said.
Lakshminarasimha Rao called the CBI court judge B Nagamaruti
Sarma to his residence on April 18 and tried to convince him on granting of
bail to Gali. Sarma did not agree for the deal and went away rejecting the
offer. He had, in fact, dismissed the bail plea. Then another person Raavi
Surya Prakash Babu, a real estate dealer, who was taken to Bellary MLA
Sriramulu by his associate Kolli Lakshmaiah Chowdary for striking the deal,
approached Rao again. Surya Prakash had already met Sriramulu's nephew and Kampli
MLA T H Suresh Babu who, too, was trying to secure bail for Gali and advised
him to wait as Nagamaruti Sarma was not of 'their type'. But he requested
Lakshminarasimha Rao to keep the `channel' open as the deal was "too
lucrative to be ignored".
Later, in a strange sequence of events, Nagamaruti Sarma was
shifted out of CBI court and a fresh bail plea was filed which came before
another special judge T Pattabhirama Rao. Lakshminarasimha Rao roped in
Pattabhi's batchmate D Prabhakar Rao, another district judge, who was with the
state election commission as its secretary (legal). He also tried to push the
deal but failed as Pattabhi told him that he would decide the matter on only
`merit'. It turned out later that Pattabhi chose a 'route' planned by his friend
Chalapati though the deal was only for Rs 5 crore. This was mainly because his
friend did not put any precondition that he should meet Gali Somasekhara Reddy,
brother of Gali Janardhana Reddy, before giving bail as was done by Prabhakar
Rao, who was also arrested in the case. Prabhakar in his confession spoke of
only Rs 15 core implying that he too was unaware of the whopping Rs 100-crore
deal. While the ACB arrested Lakshminarasimha Rao on July 12, Pattabhi was
arrested last month.
Interestingly, the ACB sleuths seized some cheques bearing
the names of Lakshminarasimha Rao's family members with some complaint letters
written by advocates against some AP high court judges. The letters were
addressed to the President of India.
Cash-for-bail scam: CBI Judge Pattabhi Rama Rao arrested
In a case of corruption seeping into the lawmakers psyche,
the Andhra Pradesh anti-Corruption bureau arrested Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) judge Justice Pattabhi Rama Rao in the cash-for-bail scam.
He was suspended after the allegations surfaced that he accepted a bribe of Rs
6 crore to grant bail to mining baron Janardhana Reddy in the illegal mining
case. Raids were earlier carried out in Rao's residence and the arrest is the
third in the case. Rao was hearing the case related to the Obulapuram Mining
Company (OMC) scam. Retired district judge T V Chalapathi Rao and Pattabhirama
Rao's son Ravichandra was also questioned by ACB sleuths. Pattabhirama and
Chalapathi were classmates at A C College of Law in Guntur and the latter
allegedly brokered the multi-crore bribe. On a tip off that a deal has been
struck between Reddy and the judge, the CBI had earlier recovered a cash of
nearly Rs 1.80 crore from a bank locker here, the keys of which were allegedly
in Ravichandra's possession.
300 Delhi lower-court judges under probe in laptop scam
Nearly 300 Delhi lower-court judges are under the scanner of
the high court for alleged financial irregularities in purchase of computers
and laptops from funds provided by the Delhi government and Delhi high court in
2013.
A high-level panel comprising three HC judges has been set
up by chief justice of Delhi high court Justice G Rohini to look into how the
money was spent by each of these judges. The panel will scrutinize documents
submitted by the judges on purchase of these items.
Under the scheme, each judge was sanctioned Rs 1.1 lakh for
upgrading their computer infrastructure. The idea was to give the judges the
freedom to opt for computers, laptops or iPads so that their efficiency in
disposal of cases improves.
Sources told TOI that the probe panel has issued memos to
judicial officers under the scanner, asking for detailed explanation on the
manner in which they spent the money.
"All judges were initially under probe but the panel
has now zeroed in on roughly 300 officers against whom preliminary
discrepancies have been found. The focus is on correctness of the utilization
certificate given by them to HC relating to the purchases," said an
authoritative source.
"It has emerged some may have bought TVs or home
theatre systems out of the sanctioned sum instead of computers," the
source added.
The irregularities came to light during a routine vigilance
inquiry conducted by court officials. When the evidence was shown to the chief
justice and other senior judges including the computer committee, it set alarm
bells ringing.
Taking a serious view of alleged financial misdemeanours by
city court judges, Justice G Rohini set up a panel comprising justices Vipin
Sanghi, Rajiv Shakdher and VK Rao to conduct a swift but wide ranging inquiry.
In response to the memos issued by the panel, sources said,
many judges have sent detailed replies with annexures explaining what was
purchased and even showing debit/credit details from their official bank
accounts that tally with the date of purchase. Details of vendors have also
been provided which is being checked individually.
"Since there was no specification of how much money is
to be used for maintenance of the new equipment, the panel is likely to give a
leeway of Rs 10,000-15,000 that may have been kept reserved for annual
maintenance charges by a judge. But beyond that, the charges if proved, may
lead to the guilty judge's dismissal from service because financial fraud or
providing forged certificates is a very serious crime," the source pointed
out.
The Delhi government had extended a similar scheme for its
bureaucracy. City bureaucrats were empowered to buy computers and related
equipment out of the sum allocated.
`Copy cat' judges suspended by HC
Five judges belonging to the state's subordinate judiciary
were suspended by the AP High Court on Wednesday for allegedly copying while
writing their LLM examinations at the Arts College of Kakatiya University in
Warangal on Tuesday.
The judges were doing this course under distance mode from
Kakatiya University as the degree would help them gain some increments in their
careers.
Those placed under suspension include K Ajitsimha Rao,
senior civil judge, Ranga Reddy district, M Kistappa, principal senior civil
judge, Anantapur, P Vijayendar Reddy, second additional district judge, Ranga
Reddy district, M Srinivasachary, senior civil judge in Bapatla of Guntur
district and Hanumantha Rao, the additional junior civil judge in Warangal.
They were allegedly caught red-handed in the act of copying
on Tuesday by the authorities and upon receipt of this information, the HC
suspended them from service pending an inquiry. The HC would soon launch
disciplinary proceedings against all these judicial officers, sources said.
DSP among six held on charge of hunting deer
Forest Department authorities on Friday arrested Deputy
Superintendent of Police (CID), Mysore, T.K. Dharmesh and five others for
allegedly hunting down a spotted deer in the Omkara forest range of Bandipur
Tiger Reserve (BTR).
The carcass of the male deer with a bullet injury was found
in Naganapura third block in the forest range, according to Forest Department
sources.
They said the Forest staff saw the accused in the forest
range during routine patrolling early on Friday and took them into their
custody. They later combed the area and found the deer carcass. Senior Forest
officers rushed to the spot on getting the information and conducted
investigation.
“The deer carcass had entry and exit bullet wound. The
post-mortem was performed and the viscera samples have been preserved,” the
sources said. A case under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, has been booked
against the accused.
The names of other accused were given as Manjaiah, Raghu,
Hanif, Atiq and Farid.
“A .303 service rifle and a multi-utility vehicle used for
committing the alleged offence have been seized from the accused,” the sources
said. Repeated attempts to contact the Forest officers investigating the case
went in a vain.
When contacted, D. Rajkumar, Honorary Wildlife Warden,
Mysore district confirmed that six persons, including Mr. Dharmesh, were
arrested on charges of alleged killing of deer. “The deer was found hunted with
a service rifle,” he said.
Raid on bus: Six police officers charged with dacoity
The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has
chargesheeted six police officials and some other private persons in the
infamous inter-State dacoity case of Rs 2.27 crore from a Kerala-bound bus in
Yelwala police station limits in Mysore in January this year. The chargesheet
was submitted in the jurisdictional court in Mysore after the Department obtained
government permission to prosecute the accused police officials – the then sub
inspector C.D. Jagadish, four constables – Satish, Manohar, Ravi and Latif of
Mysore South police station and Prakash and the gunman of the then Southern
range Inspector General of Police Ramchandra Rao under Sections 395 (dacoity)
and 120A (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.
Rao, who was transferred after he came under scanner for his
alleged involvement in the crime, does not figure in the chargesheet. “There is
no legal admissible evidence against the then IGP or the then deputy
superintendent of Police (Mysore rural) Srihari Baragur. The investigation is
however on and it will be early to come to any conclusion,” said an official
source. He added that it is a complex case because there are no independent
witnesses.
A Kerala-bound bus carrying about Rs 2.27 crore of four
jewelers was ‘raided’ by the police in Yelawala police station limits in Mysore
on January 4, who seized six bags of cash from inside the bus and arrested the
driver and the cleaner of the bus for “illegal” transportation of cash.
The police showed a recovery of Rs. 20 lakh, but the Kerala
jewelers told their Home Minister that the amount was around Rs. 2.27 crore.
“There is no clinching evidence on the exact amount, which was reportedly being
transported in the bus. We can only surmise from the statements of the victims
and the accused,” added the officer.
Rs 2.26-crore theft by cop: IGP, DySP under scanner
CID focuses on duo after gunman, informant confesses
The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of Karnataka
Police is thoroughly probing the alleged roles of K Ramachandra Rao, Inspector
General of Police (southern range) and Srihari Baragur, Deputy Superintendent
of Police (Mysore rural), in the sensational Rs 2.26-crore robbery that took place
on a Kerala-bound bus at Yelawala, Mysore, on January 4 this year. The needle
of suspicion pointed strongly towards the duo following a confession by Rao's
gunman, Prakash, who was arrested by the CID on Tuesday along with three
informants.
Statements made by the arrested gunman and the informants in
their confessions indicate that the plundered loot was shared between the IGP
and DySP. According to highly placed sources, Prakash and one of the three
informants, gave minute-by-minute accounts to the CID sleuths about the robbery
that occurred two months ago.
"We have recorded their confession statements. Before
laying our hands on the IGP and DySP, we need to collect further corroborative
evidence. At this juncture, we can neither rule out their involvement nor give
them a clean chit," a top-ranking CID official, who is part of the
investigating team, told Bangalore Mirror.
However, when BM spoke to IGP K Ramachandra Rao, he denied
all the allegations. "I am not aware of what Prakash has said in his
statements to the police. He is in the CID's custody, and they are conducting a
detailed probe. Let them come out with the truth," he said.
METICULOUSLY EXECUTED
The meticulously executed robbery unfolded on the night of
January 4, as a group of policemen led by Mysore South SI, C D Jagadish,
stopped a bus that was en route to Kerala from Bangalore, near Yelawala on the
Mysore-Hunsur state highway. They later diverted the bus to a road near
Yelawala police station and took out six bags containing hard cash from its
luggage compartment. The driver and cleaners of the bus were taken into custody
and a case slapped against them for ferrying large amounts of cash illegally.
But the cops showed a recovery amount of a mere Rs 20 lakh, whereas the actual
amount was Rs 2.26 crore.
The cash belonged to four Kerala-based jewellers who had
reportedly selected the bus to transport it from Bangalore to Kerala. It is
alleged that they had taken the owner and the driver of the bus into confidence
in order to ferry the cash.
The jewellers, to whom the cash belonged, got the shock of
their lives when they found out that the Yelawala police had stopped the bus
and booked a case against the driver and cleaners, showing a paltry sum of Rs
20 lakh as recovery.
Upon making enquiries, they learnt that the remaining Rs
2.06 crore had been pocketed by the policemen themselves. The agitated
jewellers proceeded to get in touch with Kerala Home Minister Ramesh
Chennithala, who personally knows Karnataka Home Minister K J George.
Chennithala brought the matter to the notice of George, who was reportedly
infuriated with what had happened. He immediately informed Chief Minister
Siddaramaiah — who hails from Mysore — of the incident.
ENRAGED CM SUMMONS DGP
An enraged Siddaramaiah and George are then said to have
summoned State Police Chief Lalrokhuma Pachau and asked him to get the matter
examined. Pachau got in touch with IGP Rao, and subsequently, a case was taken
up. But the top brass smelled a rat during the investigation, and a CID
investigation was ordered.
The CID sleuths conducted a methodical investigation for a
month before laying their hands on the IGP's gunman, Prakash, and his gang of
informants. Investigation by the CID also revealed that Prakash resorted to
these kinds of crimes involving Kerala jewellers regularly over the past two
years. He had allegedly taken the help of DySP Srihari Baragur, and other
policemen, to conduct false raids and clean out cash. In the past, the gang had
looted small amounts running into a few lakh. But since the amount involved now
was a staggering Rs 2.26 crore, the jewellers mustered the courage to lodge a
complaint.
"The crime does not stop with the gunman. It appears
that they got support from higher-ups. It is here we are examining the
involvement (if any) of Prakash's boss Rao, DySP Baragur, and other
seniors," the officer added. After the matter reached the CM's table, the
culprits tried to reach a compromise with the jewellers by offering to return
the money. This, however, failed to go through because some of the policemen
had taken large amounts of cash with them, and had subsequently gone
absconding, said the CID police. The absconding policemen, four in number, are
not be confused with the three informants.
Additional Director General of Police (CID) P K Garg said,
"The IGP's gunman, Prakash, was arrested two days ago. So far, we have
arrested four persons whom we are questioning and whose statements we are
recording. The money is yet to be recovered. We believe that the cash is with
the absconding policemen, and we have laid a manhunt for the four policemen,
whose names and ranks I cannot reveal."
According to sources, Prakash and his gang shared the booty
among themselves, the informants, and senior police officers. The informants
said they got around Rs 20 lakh as their cut, but claimed the rest is with
policemen of different ranks.
ROGUE COPS DON’T GIVE A BUCK
Old habits die hard: Even as the average Bengalurean stands
in long queues to withdraw his hard-earned money, corrupt policemen and babus
are busy converting or hiding their black money
Cop, 2 KRV men held for black ops; may have converted up to
Rs 2 crore
It’s a classic case of the fence eating the crop: a
policeman, instead of being on the vigil himself, was arrested for working in
cohorts with a group that helps those with black money exchange it for new
notes.
The 43-year-old police constable, B Shesha, attached with
the Central Crime Branch (CCB), was arrested for facilitating illegal cash
conversion, along with four accomplices, two of whom were members of the
Karnataka Rakshana Vedhike (KRV), Shivarame Gowda faction.
All of them were booked for assaulting and robbing a
businessman after promising to help him exchange in old currencies with the
new.
Shesha was suspected to be a major operative in the illegal
cash conversion racket, mainly targeting businessmen and trader community in
the city. It is believed that he had had helped exchange currency worth at
least Rs 2 crore for a fixed commission, since November 8 when old notes of 500
and 1,000 denominations were rendered obsolete. At least four more suspects are
yet to be arrested.
The Magadi Road police, who arrested the constable, said he
was attached to the Organised Crime Wing (OCW) of the CCB. Also arrested were G
Byresha, 37, of KP Agrahara, P Vijay, 27, of Gopalapura, K Mannivannan, 36, of
Bhuvaneshwari Nagar and Pavan. Byresha and Vijay are the KRV activists.
The police are yet to arrest four other accused. The issue
was reported after a fall out between the racketeers and their clients over
commission, leading to the abduction and assault of Jaishankar (42), a resident
of KG Nagar, who owns Shreyas Electrical shop in Vijayanagar.
He was in contact with the accused and was assured that he
would be given Rs25 lakh in new notes in exchange of Rs30 lakh of demonetised
tenders. They offered him Rs5 lakh as commission for the deal. Jaishankar
pooled in much as Rs25.2 lakh from his trader friends in the locality, but
decided to take his cut of Rs5 lakh and told the accused that he will handover
only Rs21.5 lakh. This led to an argument when Jaishanker along with his
friend, Girish, came near Star Bazaar in Magadi Police station limits to hand
over the collected amount on Saturday.
“There was some misunderstanding between both parties over
the missing Rs5 lakh and the gang forcibly took Jaishankar and his friend near
Madanayakanahalli and robbed them of the cash and were released with life
threat. The businessman had filed a complaint with the Magadai Road police on
Tuesday and identified the accused as they were known to them,” said an officer
who was a part of the investigations.
The police managed to arrest the four accused, including KRV
members Mannivannan and Pavan immediately. They revealed Shesha’s name during
interrogation. They also claimed that they thought Jaishankar will not dare to
lodge a complaint since the amount collected was unaccounted for. Later, Shesha
was picked up and his mobile phone was seized.
“Shesha is a 1996 batch police constable and has served at
Chitradurga, Chickpet and Kengeri police stations before coming to CCB. He has
been taken into police custody and we are trying to ascertain if he was
involved in similar incidents,” deputy commissioner of police (West) MN
Anucheth told BM.
Retired DySP raids
Businessmen
The city police have detained a retired deputy
superintendent of police (DySP) for allegedly posing as a fake Central Crime
Branch (CCB) official and forcefully decamping with Rs83 lakh of unaccounted
cash collected from 20 individuals, including realtors and businessmen, to be
exchanged into legal tender at a residence in JP Nagar last Thursday.
The former police officer’s involvement with the currency
exchange gang is also being probed and he is expected to be formally placed
under arrest late on Wednesday night.
The former officer, identified as Babu Noronha, retired from
police service as DySP CID early this year. He was also one of the main accused
in a fake encounter of interstate gangster Sagayam near Ramamurthy Nagar in
2003. He was posted as inspector at Commercial Street Police Station at that
time and was also the recipient of the President’s Police Gallantry Award in
2004. However, doubts were raised over the encounter and CBI registered a case
against him in which he was acquitted last year, after a prolonged trial.
More arrests are likely to be made in connection with the
case in the coming days, claimed investigating officers.
The accused was picked up on the basis of the complaint
filed by Shivaraj, a realtor who was one of the 20 people who had pooled in as
much as Rs83 lakh in demonetised currency to be exchanged at 25 per cent
commission. The deal was finalised through Karthik, who had contacted them
claiming to be a facilitator for illegal cash exchange, for a fixed commission.
The cash was to be exchanged at the residence of Satish on Thursday night and
was to be handed over to Lohith, one of the main accused in the case.
However, after Shivaraj showed the cash bundle to Lohith, a
group of men entered and claimed that they were from the Central Crime Branch
(CCB) and staged a fake arrest, asking Shivaraj to accompany them in their
vehicle. They drove around for a while and pushed Shivaraj out of the vehicle
at a deserted spot near JP Nagar and sped away with the cash. An official
complaint was filed with JP Nagar police station.
“There were six people involved in the scam and one of the
main accused, Lohit, is closely associated with Babu Noronha. We have detained
him in connection with the case,” said SD Sharanappa, Deputy Commissioner,
Bengaluru City (South).
Sources added that Babu Noronha was waiting inside a car
outside and handed his old police identity card to Lohith when he went inside
and announced to the victims that they were from the police department.
Investigating officials are also probing if any other serving or former police
official was involved in the crime.
Stop targeting whistleblower Justice Karnan. Clean up the
judicial system
By Mathews J Nedumpara
Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani recently wrote a scathing
letter to the Calcutta High Court’s Justice CS Karnan, advising him to take
back every word he has said about two Madras High Court judges and pray for
pardon. Jethmalani has termed Justice Karnan’s actions as lunatic. Neither me
nor the National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms (NLC),
of which I am the president, supports Justice Karnan nor justifies his
“tantrums”. However, the NLC supports Justice Karnan because corruption has
spread its tentacles in the justice delivery system.
Justice Karnan’s anger might be out of feelings of
discrimination, isolation and, or, humiliation. His attack on his brother
Judges of the Madras HC, sitting and retired, is perhaps vindictive. He accuses
them of having indulged in corruption, nepotism and malpractice. Though many
accused of corruption and malpractices by him could be innocent or could have
indulged in venial and not venal act of corruption or malpractice, the
allegation against at least a few of them may not be unfounded.
But the question to be answered is whether alleging
corruption against sitting or retired Judges of the high court or the Supreme
Court amounts to contempt of court as defined in Section 2(1)(c) of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 or will it attract the inherent jurisdiction of
the Supreme Court under Art.138, r/w. Arts. 140 and 142 of the Constitution to
punish a person for contempt of court.
The concept of contempt of court is a cathartic
jurisprudence, which has its origin in the Canon Law and, in particular, the
Canon Law of the Dark Ages, a jurisprudence of a time when the offence of
heresy, nay, contempt of the Church, where the contemnor is burnt alive at a
stake.
The in terrorem (a legal threat, usually one given in hope
of compelling someone to act without resorting to a lawsuit or criminal
prosecution) jurisprudence of contempt of Court militates against all canons of
justice and fair play; it flourished in the Middle Ages when Inquisition was
the mode of justice administration, where contemnor was tortured to extract
guilt. The foundation of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 on the jurisprudence
of the Dark Ages is classically exemplified in Sub-Section (5) of Section 17 of
the Act.
Our constitutional and criminal laws are founded on the
principle that the guilt against a person accused of an offence ought not to be
wrung out of him, but has to be proved against him by other men and means.
Sub-Section (5) of Section 17, supra, places the burden to
prove his innocence upon the contemnor; it requires him to file an affidavit in
support of his defence and empowers the Court to determine the matter on the
affidavit of the contemnor. Section 17(5) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971,
therefore, is in violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution, which states
that no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness
against himself; so too Arts. 21, 14 and 19 thereof, which are required to be
read together.
The power of contempt, as is presently exercised by the
judges of the higher judiciary is, with much respect, more susceptible to be
abused than used.
I have witnessed such misuse often against the voiceless,
the outspoken and persons who are upright. The power of contempt has often been
misused against the voices of truth, even though truth is an undeniable defence
against contempt proceedings.
Resorting to the power of contempt without application of
judicial mind has ramifications. It creates fear, a terror, and worst, hatred,
in the minds of citizen. As pointed out, the fear has led to not venturing to
write anything about the functioning of the judiciary, except eulogising and
flattery.
Undoubtedly, in the suo motu contempt of court proceeding
against Justice Karnan, the prosecutor and the judge, both at once, are the
judges themselves. The contempt of court law is undemocratic and, assuming it
to be otherwise, the question is, could any action lie against Justice Karnan?
It certainly will not, as:
Even assuming that Justice Karnan has made allegations of
corruption and malpractices against his judges, he has not committed any
contempt of court.
The concept of equality before law and equal protection of
law is at the core of the Constitution.
For the judges against whom Justice CS Karnan has made the
allegations of corruption, the law provides for remedy, both civil and
criminal.
It is enough to refer to the suit filed by Justice PB
Sawant, former judge of the Supreme Court, against Times Now claiming Rs 100
crore as damages to support my contention that law provides for adequate remedy
if Justice Karnan has made false or scurrilous allegations against his
brethren.
Is it then right for me to expect the vilified judges to
institute civil and criminal cases like ordinary citizens? Yes, because in the
eyes of the law, all are equal; the immunity which judges enjoy is for what
they do from the seats of justice.
I am made to understand that some of the allegations made by
Justice Karnan are against the chief justice of the Madras High Court on the
administrative side about the construction of court complexes, appointment of
judges. It must be said that a situation where judges are accused of corruption
and they are forced to institute civil and criminal cases is against their
prestige and honour and is no way an ideal situation.
Corruption is undoubtedly spreading its tentacles in the
corpus of the justice delivery system, which does not merely mean judges alone.
There ought to be a remedy. The remedy is not in silencing
the whisleblowers with the guillotine of contempt of court. There’s a need to
bring into existence a credible mechanism by which allegations of corruption,
nepotism and malpractices against judges are investigated and those who are
guilty are brought to book without impinging their independence and the
sanctity of the justice delivery system.
The judicial function has been considered to be sacrosanct;
courts are temples of justice; its majesty and credibility and the confidence
of the public has to be zealously guarded, but not by silencing whisleblowers
and upright men and women who dare to point out instances of corruption,
nepotism and malpractices, risking their professional prospects, nay, even
their freedom and liberty.
Notice To Chief
Justice of India
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/notice-to-chief-justice
Editorial : Are all
Judges Honest ? Satya Harishchandra ?
Why no action against judges who committed sex crimes
against women , who swindled employees provident fund money , etc , While
Judges belonging to powerful castes , having influence , who have done grave
crimes are let off , their cases buried. Justice karnan is tortured as he is a
dalit without any influence for exposing crimes. So called learned advocates
are defying gentleman's boundaries and personally calling a judge as lunatic.
Are those learned advocates cultured , gentleman , what they have done to safeguard
justice. Read JUSTICE KARNAN VICTIMIZED in web news paper SOS E CLARION OF
DALIT. Judge's Mafia. Overall in this saga certain people want to bury the
corruption allegations made by Justice Karnan, by diversion from core issue of
corruption by judges. In the same way dalit judges Justice Gwal & Justice
Ramakrishna were tortured by High ranking judges , where is the justice to
these persecuted dalit judges ? Why not their tormentors high court &
supreme court judges legally prosecuted under Prevention of Atrocities Act
against SC /ST ?
Judges SEX crimes
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-sex-crimes
A – Z of Manipulation
of Indian Legal
System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
50% of higher judiciary corrupt, says ex-SC judge Markandey
Katju
http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-markandey-katju/story-Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html
Eight chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Eight-chief-justices-were-corrupt-Ex-law-minister/articleshow/6568723.cms
In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul alleges graft by
SC judges, Congress
http://www.sify.com/news/in-suicide-note-arunachal-cm-kalikho-pul-alleges-graft-by-sc-judges-congress-news-national-rcruamjjfdhhc.html
,
Calcutta HC Justice Karnan calls judiciary corrupt, brings
up old allegations against HC judges
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/calcutta-hc-justice-karnan-calls-judiciary-corrupt-brings-up-old-allegations-against-hc-judges/story-k0WRYaBWRPYaUI6HgzPDHP.html
Traitors in Judiciary & Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,
Crimes by Khaki
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki
FIRST Answer Judges
Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police
The mafia
of corrupt has never allowed for
transparent , impartial investigation
into criminal cases involving higher
judges & public servants. Justice Karnan
is in the position of high court judge due to his merit , talent ,
education not on the basis of reservation or anybody’s
mercy. Justice Karnan is a whistle blower , he has exposed corruption in the higher
judiciary , he has not done any crimes. Now , powers that be instead of ordering
for a fair investigation into his
charges, is trying all out to silence him. Some people
are even making personal attacks , by calling him lunatic. Those
persons may be beneficiaries of the
existing corrupt judicial system and they
want to continue with this
present corrupt system.
In a Mental
Hospital ward , say there are number
of mentally challenged patients playing inside the ward. A doctor & his
assistant enters the ward to check , give
routine medicines , injections to patients and then all those patients call
the doctor himself as mad. It is the same situation now.
Are not
the so called learned , aged advocate ( @ god’s airport ) and
learned judges see the
crimes by judges in the past. See
sample cases mentioned above & below. What
action taken by those learned
judges & learned advocate , to safe
guard law in the above / below mentioned cases? Our judicial
system is being weakened
by corrupt judges &
few , greedy advocates
( learned ? ) , NOT by whistle blowers who
have sacrificed to protect
the nation from corrupt people.
In the past few judges
belonging to powerful castes
facing charges of gravest crimes , got a smooth sailing ,
their cases white washed. But
Justice Karnan belonging to oppressed Dalit
class is being tortured
for standing up against corruption. He has done no crimes. This is the
very reason few honest judges &
honest advocates keep
silent fearing victimization.
Hereby , we demand Honourable Supreme Court of India :
1. To order
transparent , impartial
investigation into all the above mentioned corruption cases involving
high ranking judges.
2. To order for filing charges
under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act
against high ranking judges who
tortured Dalit Judges – Justice
Karnan , Justice Gawl & Justice Ramakrishna.
3. To order for filing charges
under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act
against learned advocate &
others who made personal attacks on
Justice Karnan by calling him as lunatic
and for
obstructing legal prosecution of the corrupt judges.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Your’s
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi.
• 27 atrocities
against Dalits every day
• 13 Dalits murdered
every week
• 5 Dalits' homes or
possessions burnt every week
• 6 Dalits kidnapped
or abducted every week
• 3 Dalit women raped
every day
• 11 Dalits beaten
every day
• A crime committed
against a Dalit every 18 minutes•
Indian Match Fixing
Corrupt Judges
http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-markandey-katju/story-Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html
,
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Eight-chief-justices-were-corrupt-Ex-law-minister/articleshow/6568723.cms
,
http://justicekatju.blogspot.in/2014/08/corrupt-judges.html
,
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-court-sends-senior-judge-to-jail-lawyer-husband-court-commissioner-to-police-custody-2260018
,
http://www.indiancorruptjudges.com/ ,
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgT9P1sa8cf_Oc1HQpdwS1zT6GJWhfPZa2-VddTC5K5CHEUr08-L1NlMbGxUuF0uhiB798OAwMePdKamtYGfgf1Svf5m6JbuLFdQ_x145ZYCXJNo9EUbJCEO1YAdGtGi4u7tIu8p-p2h1u-/s1600/Karnan%2527s+letter.jpg
,
http://wakeupindia-designer.blogspot.in/2017/01/mumbai-27-th-2017-justice-chinnasamy.html
,
Editorial :
Atrocities on Dalits by Judges - SHAME SHAME
- An Appeal
to Honourable Supreme Court of India, National Human Rights Commission &
National Commission for Scheduled
Castes / Scheduled
Tribes
The track
record of apex court is not clean. There is secrecy involved in selection ,
promotion , transfer of judges to high court & supreme court. Supreme court
judges take huge pay , perks from public exchequer ( now on the verge of
getting triple fold increase in pay ) but are not accountable to public. They
don’t give information to public , concerning judges and national security ,
public welfare.
Consider the case
of Dalit judge of sukma , chattisgarh , he was removed for being honest , for
upholding law ? Now, Justice Karnan a whistle blower is being victimized. Apex court
is not looking seriously at issues raised by justice karnan but concentrating on
silencing him.
When other high
ranking judges ( having influence
& belonging to upper castes )
were accused of more grave crimes like
involvement in sex racket , sex
crimes against women , national security crimes
, etc , they were treated with kid gloves , cases hush hushed , white
washed. Inspite of fervent
appeals even apex court didn’t bother to conduct a public , transparent enquiry. Now
apex court has initiated
suo motto “contempt proceedings “
against Justice Karnan as he is a
DALIT , without influence of
powers that be.
When a
poor dalit person or
person belonging to weaker section , SC / ST builds
a temporary hutment on government
land , officials , police take suo motto action , evicts that person & razes down
that hutment immediately. Where as when
a rich person belonging to upper caste , having influence of powers that
be builds huge buildings usurping government land ,
lake bed , etc no suo motto action by police . Officials , police don’t take action
inspite of repeated appeals by concerned public. The courts of justice instead of upholding
public cause , gives stay orders
protecting rich land grabbers but in the same fashion judges don’t come to the rescue of poor dalit
hut dwellers. Even when
land grabbings were brought to the notice of apex court at the very early stage itself,
apex court instead of
preventing the land grabbing silently allowed the grabbers to continue with their land crimes. The enactments of laws by various state
governments including government of Karnataka regularizing illegal land constructions is solely to benefit greedy , rich land grabbers belonging to upper castes. Inspite of repeated appeals
the apex court has not annulled those
illegal laws of various state governments.
Just consider the
prison population in india , 80% of prisoners are under trials and majority of them are dalits, tribals , belongs to weaker sections , SC / ST. Most
of them cann’t afford lawyers , most of
them are implicated by their upper caste
masters , land lords . Even within the
prison , their rights are not respected
by authorities , are treated worse than animals. Where as
deadly criminals convicted of
gravest crimes ( but rich , belongs to
upper castes) enjoys many luxuries
within the prison. It proves the
vulnerability of the dalits , weakers
sections in india.
So many dalits ,
weaker section people were cheated
of their job oppurtunities in
mysuru university , KSOU , Various Government
Medical colleges , Government
aided ITIs , Polytechnics in Karnataka
state by scheming upper caste officials. Inspite of repeated appeals , why apex court
has not taken legal prosecution to logical end and ensured justice to aggrieved dalits ? What action supreme court has taken against KPSC , VYAPAM members who denied job oppurtunities to merited candidates ,
dalit & weaker section candidates ?
? let alone take suo motto action
. No action to logical end.
Day in day out there
are rampant atrocities against dalits , weaker sections of people by public servants , judges are not doing
their duties properly. Supreme court judges are enjoying lakhs of rupees pay ,
perks , 5 star bungalows , foreign trips
, weeks long summer / winter paid vacations
, proposed triple fold salary
hike all at tax payer’s expense. These judges must be first booked for
“Atrocities against Dalits , Weaker sections”
under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act.
If at all , Supreme
Court of India is impartial , without bias , let it come out clean :
1.
To immediately stay contempt
proceedings against Justice Karnan and Order impartial enquiry against judges accused of corruption , impropriety by
Justice Karnan and all other issues raised by him. Take the help of Justice
Karnan in collecting evidences.
2.
Order impartial enquiry against almost half of former chief justices of
india accused of corruption by NGOs.
3.
Immediately give justice to past Sukma Dalit Judge who was unjustly
removed.
4.
Immediately give truthful ,
full information , answers to RTI questions sent to Supreme Court of
India by our publication years ago. Inspite of several appeals , majority of
questions are unanswered & for few questions got ambiguous answers.
5.
Immediately take action to
protect fundamental rights , human rights of whistle blowers , RTI Activists
& Human Rights Activists.
6. Immediately take
action against KPSC , VYAPAM members responsible for illegal recruitments
, cancel all those illegal recruitments
and conduct recruitments afresh with old candidates.
7. Immediately take action against KSOU , Mysuru University , Government Medical
Colleges , Government Aided Polytechnics , ITI officials responsible for illegal recruitments ,
cancel all those illegal recruitments
and conduct recruitments afresh with old candidates.
8. Immediately annul
laws enacted by various state governments in india
regularizing illegal constructions by
land grabbers .
9. Make public the
names of all land grabbers , majority of them belongs
to upper castes and are rich , greedy.
10. Protect the rights of prisoners in india irrespective of their caste affiliations.
11. Ensure speedy justice ,
legal aid to under trials
belonging to weaker sections , SC & ST.
12. Fix lower
amount for bail surety or create a
corpus to give bail amount
to under trials belonging to SC , ST , Weaker sections , Dalits. Many
dalits who are poor are unable to
pay bail amount and suffer in jail for
years much more than the legally
stipulated punishment even if convicted.
13. Enforce uniform rules , uniform food , uniform health
care , uniform prison cell to all prisoners irrespective of their caste , whether he is an ex chief minister , ex managing director of a big company , ex
religious guru or an ordinary person , a dalit , a tribal. Ensure equality , equal treatment in prisons , jails.
14. Why NOT criminal prosecution of guilty judges
who commited atrocities on dalits
under SC / ST Atrocities
prevention act is not taken , till it’s
logical end ? are judges above law ? why such guilty judges are put behind bars
for this non bailable offence ? only
transfer or resignation of judges will not serve the purpose , they must be put
behind bars & legally prosecuted for their heinous crimes . Is the not the apex
court is also practicing double standards & indirectly aiding atrocities on dalits ? Read following
sample cases of “Atrocities on Dalits committed by Judges”.
15. Immediately
admit PILs presented before supreme
court of india by our publication . Read full details at following web pages ;
Traitors in Judiciary & Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,
Crimes by Khaki
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki
FIRST Answer Judges
Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police
“There is a higher court than the court of justice and that
is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”
- Mahatma Gandhi
“Contempt
Proceedings” should not be used
as a weapon to silence voices seeking
justice , accountability of judiciary. Respect of judiciary doesn’t come
out of fear rather spontaneously it comes out of a person’s heart when
he sees a honest judge doing his duties honestly.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Your’s ,
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
Allegations of dalit atrocities and nepotism against CV
Nagarjuna Reddy J. of Andhra Pradesh
The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR)
has written to Chief Justice of India TS Thakur seeking initiation of in-house
proceedings against Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy for alleged atrocities against
members of Dalit community.
In a 9-page letter written on August 30 this year, the CJAR
has detailed various allegations against the sitting judge including a detailed
account of “criminal misconduct” against a dalit magistrate.
According to the letter, one Rama Krishna, a Principal
Junior Civil judge in Kadappa District, was forced by Justice Nagarjuna Reddy
to remove the name of Pavan Kumar Reddy from a dying declaration recorded by
Rama Krishna when he was posted as a magistrate. Pavan Reddy happens to be the brother of Justice Reddy.
As per the dying declaration given by the victim, Pavan
Reddy had doused the victim with petrol and set him of fire when he refused to
sign on a blank paper.
“Soon thereafter, on 30.11.2012, it is alleged by Mr. Rama
Krishna that Justice Nagarjuna Reddy rang him up, and directed him to remove
his brother’s name from the dying declaration. Mr. Rama Krishna also alleges
that he was threatened and abused by the said judge when he refused to accede
to his request.”
It has also been alleged that the Magistrate was later
summoned to Justice Nagarjuna Reddy’s house where,
“….Pavan Reddy and Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy abused him
and beat him up. He further alleges that Justice C. V. Nagarjuna Reddy kicked
him with his shoes and abused his caste”.
It is Rama Krishna’s allegation that he was victimised
following this incident by “unexplained” transfers and suspensions.
Another allegation against the judge is the abuse of power
to get that very Pavan Reddy appointed as Additional Public Prosecutor.
“Mr. Pavan Kumar Reddy was appointed as Additional Public
Prosecutor in the year 2006 for a period of three years in contravention of the
law that mandates seven years of continuous practice as an advocate prior to
appointment as an Additional Public Prosecutor.”
Based on the above, CJAR has not only sought an in-house
enquiry but has also asked for the suspension of judicial work assigned to
Justice Reddy. Chief Justice Thakur has not responded to CJAR’s representation
yet.
This is the second such allegation against a sitting judge
of High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.
In 2015, an Additional District judge from Andhra Pradesh
had approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 alleging caste discrimination
by a sitting High Court judge, Justice M Satyanarayana Murthy.
The Supreme Court had, however, refused to admit the matter
with a Bench presided by then Chief Justice Dattu likening the case to a
service matter and observing that the case was a grievance of an individual and
cannot be considered as a case pertaining to Fundamental rights.
Impeachment Motion: Five Main Allegations Against Justice CV
Nagarjuna Reddy
December 9, 2016 8:45 pm
Sixty one Rajya Sabha members have moved a petition for
impeachment proceedings against Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy of the Andhra
Pradesh/Telangana High Court.
The following are the main allegations against the Judge
Misused his position as HC judge to ‘victimize’ a ‘Dalit’
Judge
The impeachment motion describes the allegation made by Mr.
Rama Krishna, formerly Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty, Kadapa District,
currently under suspension, that he was forced by Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
to remove the name of Mr. Pavan Kumar Reddy who happens to be the brother of
Justice Reddy, from a dying declaration recorded by Mr. Rama Krishna when he
was posted as Magistrate in Rayachoty. He alleged that Justice Reddy had
summoned him to his home and when he refused to remove the name of his brother
from the dying declaration, he kicked him with his shoes and abused his caste.
Charges of Dalit atrocity against spouse, daughter and
brother
Another incident of alleged Dalit atrocity pertaining to the
registration of an FIR by the ‘Dalit’ tenants against Justice C.V. Nagarjuna
Reddy’s wife and daughter, is also mentioned. There also allegations that Mr.
Pavan Kumar Reddy commits these various atrocities against the Dalits community
under the protective banner of his brother, Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy’s
influence
Disproportionate income
The motion also alleges that Justice Reddy abused his
position to amass several movable and immovable properties crores of rupees
disproportionate to his known sources of income.
Non-Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities
Yet another allegation against Justice Reddy is that he has
not disclosed his assets and liabilities in violation of the Code of Conduct
that mandates declaration of assets of oneself and dependents by all the
judges.
Misconduct when he was an Advocate
It is also mentioned in the impeachment motion that Justice
Reddy committed misconduct while he was working as Standing Counsel, for the
High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
India's courts 'condone' Dalit atrocities
Caste-blind judiciary fails Dalit victims as number of sex
attacks are reported against former untouchables.
Twenty two years ago,
in Bhateri village in the western Indian state of Rajasthan, Bhanwari Devi was
gang-raped by five men. The reason was neither lust nor just patriarchy. Devi’s
fault was that as a lower-caste woman, she had dared to transgress the age old
strictures of caste - by protesting against the practice of child marriage,
which was a staple among the upper-castes. Hence, he was meted out a
"deserving punishment".
When the matter finally reached the court, the judge
acquitted all the five rapists, holding, among a host of other reasons, that
since the upper castes practised strict untouchability, it was inconceivable
that any of the five would touch a lower caste woman. Till today, Devi remains
deprived of justice.
Now that there is a tidal wave of opprobrium and
condemnation against the gang-rapes and murder at Badaun in northern Uttar
Pradesh state and the gang-rapes in Bhagana, Haryana, the next question one is
confronted with is - will justice be done? And if so, how?
While investigations are still on, and arrests have been
made, it is only the first step. The final outcome in the courts is all that
matters, and it is here that there is cause for much alarm and disappointment.
For, India’s courts have consistently failed the Dalits (untouchables) by
steadfastly refusing to acknowledge that sexual violence is perpetrated because
of a woman's caste.
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989, commonly known as PoA Act, recognises rape and other
forms of sexual violence as an "atrocity"- an aggravated offence, as
opposed to the general crime of rape. The reason is that an atrocity, as
philosopher Claudia Card defines it, is a "gross evil - the widespread
toleration of wrongfully perpetrated intolerable harm to individuals".
Because Dalit women's bodies are stigmatised - they are
considered expendable and justifiably available for recreational
(pleasure-seeking) or punitive purposes of upper-caste men, the law seeks to
bring in substantive equality by recognising the lived reality of the victims.
Therefore, it is imperative for courts to recognise that the
sine qua non for the deeming rape as an atrocity under the law is that the
violence was perpetrated on the ground that the victim hailed from a lower
caste.
Tragically, it is here that the judicial record is one of
abject failure. Not only have the judges refused to acknowledge the reality of
caste, but have also attributed reasons such as "unrequited passion",
"exploration of sexuality" and let off the accused. Even if there is
a conviction for rape, an acquittal from the charges of atrocity renders
justice not only incomplete, but also as a travesty.
Khairlanji village in western Maharashtra state stands out
as the most infamous example in recent times. On September 26, 2006, four
members of Suresh Bhotmange's (a Dalit) family were killed in the most gruesome
manner. His wife and daughter were stripped, thrashed, and paraded naked
through the village, before being subjected to a fiendish gang-rape.
Nothing was left....knives, iron rods, spikes of bullock
cart wheels- everything was thrust in their private parts. Bhotmange's
"crime" was the police complaint that he had lodged against the
upper-caste Hindus grabbing the plot of land that was rightfully his.
The autopsy was done in the shoddiest manner - no efforts
were made to test for rape, even though the naked bodies of the two women lay
in the village for a considerable period of time. All the accused who were
arrested were convicted by the trial court of murder and other offences, but
not for rape.
Worse was in store in the Bombay High Court. In its 2010
judgement, the court put down the atrocities to reasons of personal rivalry and
individual revenge. Shockingly, the court went to considerable lengths to hold
that because there was no evidence, no rape had been committed - completely
ignoring the harsh reality - that there would be no witnesses, and that the
trial court had committed a glaring omission by ignoring evident facts. If the
naked and badly mangled bodies of Dalit women did not stir the court to
acknowledge sexual atrocity, perhaps nothing else could have. The appeal
against the high court’s judgement remains undecided till this date.
The case of Hanamath was an appeal to the Karnataka High
Court against the conviction of four men for gang-raping a 15-year-old Dalit
girl. The court upheld the conviction of rape because it could have done little
else - all the proof - eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence were stacked
against the accused. But when it came to holding the culprits guilty under the
PoA Act, the court not only demonstrated its blindness to caste, but took the
"boys will be boys" line of reasoning, holding that the gang-rape was
"a lustful act of misguided youth".
Leave aside convictions. How does one prove to the court
that a rape was committed because the perpetrators wanted to exercise their
upper caste power and pelf? There cannot be any rule of evidence, except that
of social reality - that the caste system, in all its vicious manifestations,
exists.
Hence, the Supreme Court's judgement in Ramdas (2006)
rankles, and rankles hard. In the dead of night, three men dragged out a young
woman of the low-ranking Pardhi caste and raped her. This was after she had
refused to obey their summons, belonging to a landowning upper-caste, who
wanted her to satisfy their carnal desires.
Of course, they wouldn’t have had the temerity to exercise
the same obnoxious power on a woman of their own, or a higher caste, but then,
Dalit women are fair game!
But the court was not inclined to accept this, and held -
"The mere fact that the victim happened to be a girl belonging to a
scheduled (lower) caste does not attract the provisions of the (PoA) Act."
When a judgement of the Supreme Court deals a body blow to
the very foundations of the law which aims to protect, impunity will certainly
continue, unabated.
Contempt notice shows Supreme Court's Anti-dalit
bias, says Justice S C Karnan
In what might be a first, Calcutta high court's Justice S C
Karnan, facing a notice from the Supreme Court in a contempt case, has lashed
out at the apex court, accusing it of harbouring a caste bias against him.
In defiance of the SC's decision and sharply escalating the
confrontation with the apex court, Karnan accused the CJI J S Khehar-led
seven-judge bench of uppercaste bias in initiating proceedings as he belonged
to the Dalit community.
Karnan virtually alleged that the court order amounts to an
offence under the law to punish atrocities against Dalits and tribals and
challenged the court to refer his case to Parliament.
He said: "The suo motu order against me, a Dalit judge,
is unethical and goes against the SC and ST (Prevention of) Atrocities Act. It
is certainly a national issue and a wise decision would be to refer the issue
to the House of Parliament."
The judge argued that since the order against him was
"harsh", the contempt case should be heard after CJI Khehar retired
or placed before Parliament if this was not possible.
In his anxiety to respond to the SC's February 8 judicial
order, Karnan addressed a four-page letter to the SC's registrar general, a
post that no longer exists as it was redesignated years ago as secretary
general.
Karnan, who has been at the centre of several controversies,
was issued a notice and asked to present himself in the Supreme Court on
February 13 to explain "scurrilous" allegations against sitting and
former judges.
In response to the apex apex court's contempt proceedings,
Justice Karnan said: "The suo motu petition is not maintainable against a
sitting judge of the HC... I have sent representations to various government
authorities regarding high irregularities and illegalities occurring at the
judicial courts.
I am also a responsible judge to control such high
irregularities, especially corruption and malpractice. I have furnished
comprehensive proof of unethical practices happening with the respective
courts.
'Upper caste judges taking law into hands'
He had earlier written to the National Commission for
Scheduled Castes, levelling charges of anti-Dalit bias against the chief
justice of the Madras high court in 2014 when he was a member of the bench
there.
Referring to the February 8 order that also stripped him of
judicial and administrative work, Karnan said: "The characteristic of this
order clearly shows that the upper caste judges are taking law into their hands
and misusing their judicial power by operating the same against a SC/ST judge
(Dalit) with mala fide intention to get rid of him."
Referring to the "harsh order" passed earlier by a
bench headed by Khehar, Karnan said: "Therefore, my deep request is to
hear the suo motu contempt after retirement of the Chief Justice of India. In
the meanwhile, my administrative work and judicial assignment could be
restored.
My main contention is only to uproot the corruption
prevailing at the Madras high court, and not to spoil the sanctity and decorum
of the court."
"I (had) issued a list of the corrupted judges wherein
an inquiry is mandatory, as such the suo motu petition is not maintainable. The
order of the apex court in the suo motu contempt petition is erroneous and has
been wilfully and wantonly and with mala fide intention was passed.
Therefore, these proceedings may be referred to Parliament,
wherein I will establish the high rate of corruption prevailing with the
judiciary at the Madras high court."
Indicating that he might not present himself before the
seven-judge bench of the SC on February 13, he said: "The Supreme Court
had not granted stipulated time (for him to respond to the contempt notice),
which is highly irregular."
DALIT Judge dismissed
for being HONEST ?
- An Appeal to Honourable Chief Justice of India
Chief Judicial
Magistrate of Sukma District in Chhattisgarh state of India Mr. Prabhakar Gwal
is a Dalit , from oppressed class. Being from an oppressed class , he best
understood the sufferings of
oppressed sections of society , sufferings
of people , tribals displaced
from forests to make way for big industries , MNCs. He understood the oppression of
common public by police , state
machinery resulting in common man’s human rights , constitutional rights
violations. He understood the machinations of state machinery to favor big industrialists , also he
understood the misuse of office by
public servants all against the
rule of LAW.
Sukma CJM Mr. Gwal
sincerely did his constitutional
duty , to uphold rule of law and earned the wrath of powers that be , Criminal
Nexus , he was repeatedly interfered in his judicial duties , repeatedly transferred and now
unjustly dismissed from service without
ANY ENQUIRY giving a chance for
Mr.Gwal to make out his case. Whereas
some other selfish judges turned their blind eyes to the sufferings of public , violations of law by public servants ,
intentionally failed to uphold the
law and got smooth sailing for their own
career.
Hereby , We urge
the Honourable Chief Justice of India
to order the Chhattisgarh State
Government :
1. To immediately
reinstate Mr.Gwal into judicial service.
2. To make posting
at the same place , same court of Sukma , so that he can complete the cases concerning the powers that be to the logical end.
3. To initiate criminal legal prosecution against
district collector , police officials , public servants who directly & indirectly interfered in the judicial duties performed by Mr. GWAL.
4. To initiate criminal legal prosecution against Chhattisgarh
High Court Judges who instead of
upholding rule of law , supporting Mr. Gwal in his duties took sides with criminal nexus , powers that
be and repeatedly transferred him and now dismissed him from service
without enquiry.
5. To reopen all
the buried cases which were dealt by Mr.
Gwal and buried by transfer of
judge Mr. Gwal. To take action
against ministers , public servants
involved in those cases.
6. To initiate criminal action against sukma district collector , police
officials and Chhattisgarh High Court
Judges on charges of Atrocities against DALIT
Mr. Gwal who was repeatedly harassed
by them.
7. To initiate criminal
prosecution under anti terror laws ,
against present and past
chattisgarh state government ministers , central government ministers ,
police officials , public servants who
were and are responsible for
creation of terror outfit SALWA
JUDUM , it’s recent terror child salwa judum – 2. These public
servants have indulged in terror acts
of salwa judum , by aiding & sponsoring it , which is against law.
Date : 30.04.2016…………………………..Your’s sincerely
Place : Mysuru………………………………Nagaraja.M.R.
Chief Judicial Magistrate- Sukma district dismissed by
Chhattisgarh Government
The Raman Singh government has dismissed Sukma district’s
Chief Judicial Magistrate Prabhakar Gwal from service in “public interest”,
following the recommendation of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Mr. Gwal, a Dalit
Magistrate was dismissed on the basis of “available material” (not in public
domain) without a internal/departmental inquiry.
On April 4 afternoon, Mr Gwal had updated the news of his
termination via his Facebook account-
“DISTRICT COURT DANTEWADA (918982620495):- //ORDER//
F.No.3335/987/XXI-B/C.G./16
Raipur, dated 01.04.2016
“Government of Chhattisgarh state hereby, dismisses Shri
prabhakar gwal, Member of lower Judicial Services, Civil judge class-I and
Chief judicial magistrate, Sukma, from service in public interest with
immediate effect.
District and sessions Judge
South Baster dantewada C.G.”
Earlier, Gwal had hit the headlines for alleging that a BJP
legislator, Ramlal Chouhan, had threatened him after he convicted five people
in connection with the leak of PMT question papers in 2011. His wife too had
written to the President alleging harassment, claiming that Gwal was
transferred to Sukma as a result of his judgment. Mr Prabhakar had accused a
ruling BJP MLA of threatening him over the judgment.
Mr. Gwal has had a history of exposing corrupt officials and
politicians. While Gwal was posted in Bilaspur, he had ordered an inquiry
against government officials and Police officers, for the infamous ‘Bhadaura
Land-Scam’. The land scam is known for involvement of a senior minister of BJP
(Amar Agrawal). Similarly, he had ordered for inquiry of Bilaspur RTO
officials. He was then transferred to Raipur, where he rejected to accept
Closure Report in the case of IPS Rahul Sharma’s suicide. After that he was
transferred to Dantewada. Recently his phone conversation with Dantewada
Collector had gone viral, in which Collector had asked Gwal to consult him
before ordering to file any case.
He is known for taking strong actions against the executive
arm of the government and enjoys a public image of being an upright man. His
dismissal comes after his wife filed a civil case against 19 people including
judicial officers for harassing her husband. HC stayed that case, meanwhile his
dismissal was recommended.
A Dalit officer being dismissed in such a one-sided,
clouded, swift manner raises larger questions on the system itself. Was he an
inconvenient man who didn’t understand the system and it’s ‘norms’? Did his
voice against BJP MLA (Ramla Chauhan), Mr Amar Agarwal and Mr Neeraj Bhansod
(for interfering in judicial work) made higher ups uncomfortable? These
questions are being raised after his dismissal. The ball is in the judiciary
and government court to clear and come out clean. A dismissal order by merely
stating, that ‘it is in public interest’ doesn’t fit the democratic norms in
2016.
Protests greet Chhattisgarh government’s dismissal of
Sukma’s Chief Judicial Magistrate
On 14 April, the Chhattisgarh government dismissed Sukma’s
Chief Judicial Magistrate Prabhakar Gwal. A 2006 batch judicial officer, Gwal,
belongs to the Dalit community and has questioned the manner in which the
police have been indiscriminately arresting tribals in the conflict zones of
Chhattisgarh.
On 8 February, the
Sukma Superintendent of Police complained to the District Judiciary against
Gwal stating that among other things he has been granting bail to naxal accused
and such decisions have “adversely affected the morale of the security forces”
and “weakens the judicial process”. It is based on such complaints that
Chhattisgarh government dismissed Gwal on the grounds of “public interest”
following the recommendation of the Chhattisgarh High Court. The Indian
Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL), in a press release, has protested
against the dismissal of Gwal, calling it unjustified. It
said: “Police high-handedness and harassment of those involved in the
administration of justice is nothing new to the conflict zones of Chhattisgarh.
Recently advocates of the Jagdalpur
Legal Aid Group (JagLAG) have been forcefully evicted from Jagdalpur and
pressure is being mounted on them by the police administration and police
backed vigilante groups to cease their
legal practice. JagLAG has been providing legal Aid to many tribals
incarcerated in Jagdalpur and Dantewada. Similarly Social activists such as
Soni Sori and Bela Bhatia and journalists like Malini Subramaniam,
Prabhat Singh, Santosh Yadav and Somaru Nag who have been
raising issues of Human rights violations by the police administration have
been threatened, attacked or even arrested. “ The IAPL has alleged that under
the pretext of “Mission 2016”, i.e., the present offensive launched by the
government to wipe out the Maoist movement in Chhattisgarh, the police in these
areas have been taking steps to see that no alternate voice emanates from these
areas. The IAPL has raised the larger issue of keeping the judiciary away from
police interference , following this dismissal. “Chhattisgarh jails are filled
with tribals who have been arrested,
several false and fabricated criminal cases are foisted upon
them and they remain incarcerated for several years. Anyone who supports such
tribals and questions the policies of the state are branded as “terrorists”
or “anti-national”. In such a situation,
the judicial system is their last hope. Hence, it is vital that the judiciary
be allowed to carry on its functions in accordance with law and without any
interference from the police”, it has said. That the dismissal coincides the
recent briefing by the National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval for the
Supreme Court Judges at a retreat at the National Judicial Academy, Bhopal, has
led to concern among the observers. If police excesses in the name of security
concerns in conflict zones are to be tolerated by the judiciary, and the
judiciary meekly accepts such advice from the Government, then the signs are
ominous, according to an activist
lawyer, who has been fighting cases involving civil liberties. The IAPL has alleged
that executive interference in judiciary in this manner militates against the
basic structure of the Constitution
which emphasises separation of powers and independence of judiciary.
Lawyers point out that if the Executive is unhappy wih Gwal’s decisions, it has
the option to appeal against them in the higher courts. Dismissing a Judge, soley on the ground of his decisions
which were in favour of citizens, is inconsistent with the concept of
independence of judiciary, they suggest. IAPL has called upon all, especially
those from the legal fraternity to
resist these moves to prejudice the judiciary and also demanded the immediate
reinstatement of Prabhakar Gwal as the Sukma CJM. The press statement has been
signed for IAPL, among others, by wellknown
advocate from Raipur, Sudha Bharadwaj.
Legal Notice to Chief Justice of India
To,
Honourable Chief Justice of India,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,
New Delhi.
Honourable Sir ,
Subject : Legal Notice to Chief Justice of India
Are Judges ,
Police PERFECT ? Satya Harishchandra ?
Hereby , I challenge Chief Justice of India in the exercise of my FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES as a citizen of india , that subject to
conditions I will legally prove the crimes of few
judges , police , public servants within
the government service and other
criminals. Is the CJI ready to book those criminals , traitors , anti
nationals ?
Since 25 years I am appealing to apex court for justice
concerning various public issues , no justice in sight but injustices meted
out one after another. But the same judges are
SHAMELESSLY taking huge pay perks
for years now are also poised to
get almost triple fold
salary increase. Parasites feeding
on Indian Public. Whenever questions of accountability
are asked judges level contempt charges against
the questioner or police
fix him in fake cases or he is silenced by threats ,
murders , denial of jobs , etc. Since 25
years in many ways they
are trying to silence me. Just take the recent example of Justice
Karnan who leveled corruption charges
against specific judges with CJI.
Instead of conducting a fair
investigation into the matter , CJI
tried to silence him by
serving him contempt notice.
Our Judges , Police are
NOT Perfect Not Satya Harischandras . There are criminals
as well as honest people side by
side in
judiciary & police. We whole heartedly respect honest few in
judiciary , police & public service. But
we detest corrupt
judges , corrupt police. Honest
Judges & Police are not coming into open to prosecute their corrupt colleagues, why ? silenced ?
Criminalization of
all wings of government has taken place , unfit people are in the positions of power. Corruption in
judiciary , police , CBI , CVC , Public service is rampant. Now MAFIA is at
work. Only few scandals , scams become
public , many are buried. If one
criminal public servant is caught other
public servant who is also a criminal conducts name sake investigation , gives report , clean chit. Law courts rely on the
government reports as evidences , courts are not bothered about credibility of
reports or investigations. It is quid pro quo. Therefore technically criminal
public servants are never proved for their crimes & convicted , as
investigation itself is not fair.
A Crime may happen without the knowledge of police but
cann’t continue for years without
the connivance of police. A Crime reported to court cann’t
continue for years without connivance of judges.
At the bottom of the paper , I have given web sites about few
ACB raids on government officials
and unearthing of crores worth property.
How they have earned it , by misusing their official positions.
Therefore government reports ,
records prepared by these officials ,
investigations conducted by corrupt
police are suspect. But Law
courts in various cases , considers government reports , records , statements of government officials as
sacrosanct . Therefore in many
cases injustice is meted out by
court , as they depend on reports of corrupt government officials ,
corrupt police.
The public servants & the government must be role models
in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher
himself makes a mistake , all his
students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a
police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his
patronage. even if a police , public
servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be
sought by the aggrieved. just think , if
a judge himself that too of apex court
of the land himself commits crime - violations of RTI Act ,
constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing
their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and
freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They
will have sweet tongues and silly hearts.
They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political
squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir
Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our
criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police , public servants
& Judges.
I don’t know whether secretariat staff of CJI office &
DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my appeals for justice , e-mails to you or
not. They will be held accountable for their lapses if any. This notice is
against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion
with criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against
them , to the office of CJI , NOT personally against you.
Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;
DLGLA/E/2013/00292
DEPOJ/E/2013/00679
In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most
basic freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the
government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to
their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered about the lives
of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on
the public exchequer . these people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced
forever , the crimes of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRW’s appeals to you ,you have not
yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives of
people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the
criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police to enquire me ,to
take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to
silence me.all of you enjoy “legal immunity privileges” ,why don’t you have given
powers to the police / investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry
?or else why don’t all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily
for enquiry ?at the least why don’t all of you are not sending your statement
about the case to the police either through legal counsel or through post? you
are aiding criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE
PRESS mysore , city civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc &
by illegally closing my newspaper. Even
Press accreditation to me as a web journalist is denied till
date. there is a gross, total mismatch
between your actions and your oath of office. this amounts to public cheating
& moral turpitude on your part.
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you
hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized
crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of
the citizens of india and of neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN
RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental
duties as a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional
duties you have caused me damages / losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO CRORE
ONLY.
9. You are responsible for
crime cover ups mentioned in my RTI Appeals , PILs and continuation of
those crimes unabated.
10. You are
responsible for denial of
information, which vindicates the crimes of powers that be.
11. You are responsible for physical assaults , murder
attempts on me.
12. You are responsible for
job denials to me at NIE , PES Engineering college , RBI Press , Mysore
, Bangalore Courts.
13. You are responsible for my illegal retrenchment from RPG Cables , denial of
medical care to me towards
occupational health problems.
14. You are responsible for denying me legal aid.
15. You are responsible for illegal closure of my news paper.
16. You are responsible for
denial of press accreditation to
me as a web journalist till date.
17. You are responsible for repeatedly passing on my appeals to police. So that they can
take statements , close the file
under the threat of police power.
18. You have violated
my Human Rights & Fundamental Rights.
19. In terms of Integrity , Honesty You & other public servants are nowhere near
Baba Saheb B R Ambedkar , Mahatma Gandhi
& Satya Harishchandra . Many
Public servants are UNFIT to be in their
posts.
You are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and
SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you cann’t be legally prosecuted for the above
mentioned crimes . If you don’t answer
it will be admission of the charges
by you. It will amount to
confession of crimes on your own.
If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where
for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss
of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government.
prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant
(sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called
the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the
culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be
done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me
or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents
, loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned
accussed public servants , Chief Justice of India & Jurisdictional District
Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake
charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me ,
this complaint is & will be effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the
government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors
of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards ,
the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension ,
property , etc of guilty judges , police officials , public servants &
Constitutional fuctionaries.
Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.
Send reply to :
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
Editor , SOS e Voice for Justice & SOS e Clarion of
Dalit,
LIG 2 , NO 761 , HUDCO First Stage,
Laxmikantanagar , Hebbal ,
Mysuru – 570017.
Date : 05.03.2017……………………………………………..your’s sincerely,
Place : Mysore , India………………………………………….Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
Editorial : Ugly
Face of Indian
Judiciary
How can a common
citizen can get justice at the hands of these type of ugly , greedy Indian
judges ? We have shown with examples of actual cases how a case can be manipulated from FIR registration stage to judgment pronouncement stage. These are only sample
cases , tip of ice berg , many are buried underneath.
Hereby , we appeal
to honest few in Indian judiciary , to
legally prosecute their corrupt colleagues.
Your’s
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
Gujarat court issues warrants against President of India ,
CJI
Jan 28, 2004,
NEW DELHI: Be you ever so high, you can still be made an
accused at Rs 40,000 in Gujarat. That's what's been done to people like
President A P J Abdul Kalam, Chief Justice of India V N Khare, a sitting
Supreme Court judge B P Singh and five times president of the apex court bar
association R K Jain.
"What is happening in Gujarat? By giving Rs 40,000 you
can get a judicial order?" CJI Khare wondered on Wednesday as a news
channel journalist Vijay Shekhar handed over copies of the video tapes exposing
rampant corruption in a Ahemdabad metropolitan magistrate's court.
"If this is the state of affairs, only God knows what
will happen to the country," said an anguished CJI Khare against whom the
magistrate had issued bailable warrants to appear before him in a criminal case
on February 17.
Shekhar said he obtained warrants on the genuine addresses
of President Kalam, CJI Khare, Justice Singh and former Supreme Court bar
association president Jain. But their designations were not disclosed in the
complaint which the lawyers had arranged for issuing the warrants on January
15.
Three local lawyers--Narendra Choudhry, Iqbal Katia and
Harish Bhanwaniwala (president of the Meghni Nagar courts)-- had helped him
secure bailable warrants, journalist said.
Shekhar had told lawyer that he wanted to settle score with
his business rivals--Kalam, CJI Khare, Justice Singh and Jain.
Magistrate's name is not disclosed in the petition.
A Bench of CJI Khare, Justices S B Sinha and S H Kapadia
ordered the Gujarat High Court registrar general to immediately seize and seal
the file from the magistrate of court No. 10, Meghani Nagar, Ahmedabad.
It asked the registrar general to send the file to the
Supreme Court at the earliest as it will hear the public interest petition on
Thursday.
Petitioner's counsel Harish Salve said the warrants were
issued in connection with a case titled Suresh Kumar Jethalal Sanghavi vs
Rajendra Kumar Jain and others under section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and
420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code at a cost of Rs 40,000.
Salve said the original tape of the sting operation, an
edited copy of the recording, all the four warrants in original, a certified
copy of the order dated January 15 passed by the metropolitan magistrate court
No.10, Meghani Nagar, Ahmedabad and the original receipt issued by the `nazir'
of the said court towards deposit of the requisite fee for issuance of
certified copies of the order.
The tv channel wanted to telecast the tape but Salve had
advised them not to do so before the matter was brought to the notice of the
court.
What had prompted Shekhar to conduct the sting operation? It
was after coming to know that a large number of businessmen having disputes
were taking undue advantage of the criminal process of the judicial system by
filing false and concocted criminal complaints to harass their business rivals
for vested interests.
In order to test the ``brazenness' that he chose the four
names of persons with whom he assumed any lawyer and particularly judicial
officer would be easily familiar with.
Five AP judges caught cheating in law exam
Last updated: 26 August, 2010
Hyderabad, Aug 26 (PTI)
In a major embarrassment for the Andhra Pradesh judiciary,
five judges were caught cheating while writing the LLM (Master of Law)
examination for which they were promptly suspended by the High Court.
One of the judges was found copying from a law book hidden
under his answer sheet. Written slips and pages torn from textbooks were seized
from other judges.All the materials were confiscated by university invigilators
who stopped the judges from writing any further.
The five judges were caught copying by the invigilators
during the first-year LLM examson August 24 at the Kakatiya University's Arts
College in Warangal town, about 150 km from here, a senior court official said.
According to N Manohar, the university's additional
controller of examinations, the candidates were taking their examinations in
Room No 102 when a team headed by him made a surprise visit.
The judges were caught on camera copying from books,
smuggled notes, and each other.
After a report was received from the Kakatiya University,
Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court Mohammad Kakru placed the five
judges under suspension pending inquiry against them, the official said.
The suspended judges are Ajitsimha Rao, Vijender Reddy, M
Kistappa, Srinivasachary and Hanumantha Rao.If they had passed the LLM
examinations, they would have been eligible for promotions and increments. Two
others, both advocates were also caught copying.
"It doesn't matter whether or not they are judges. They
were indulging in malpractices and we have booked cases against them,"
says Dayakar Rao, the Principal of the university said.
The Warangal Bar Association said the whole episode was a
blot on the judiciary. "The judiciary is the final recourse for common
people to get justice - and if the judges indulge in this kind of malpractice,
how can you trust the judgment of the courts?" asked Ravi Kumar of the
association.
A woman judge in India has accused a superior judge of
sexual harassment.
New Delhi, Aug 4/Nationalturk – A woman judge in India has
quit her job after alleging a sexual harassment by a superior judge, who had
also asked her to “dance on an item song”.
A woman additional judge in Gwalior in Indian state of
Madhya Pradesh has alleged sexual harassment by a senior judge of the local
High Court.
According to the victim, the judge constantly pestered her
and once sent her a message through an official to “perform dance on an item
song” at a function at his home.
“When I spurned the judge’s various advances and malicious
aspirations, he targeted me professionally,” the woman judge said in her
complaint to Indian president Pranab Mukherjee, Chief Justice of India R M
Lodha and Indian Law minister.
For spurning advances of the superior judge, she was
transferred to a remote area.
Finally, the woman judge failed to cope up with the pressure
and resigned on July 15.
I was left with no option but to resign: Victim
In her complaint she said she was left with no option but to
resign. “I resigned on July 15 in compelling, humiliating and disgraceful
circumstances to save my dignity, womanhood, self-esteem and career of my
daughter”.
“If this is how a mother, sister and wife can be treated,
who is herself no less than a judicial officer duty-bound to protect society
and law, what constitutional goals are we serving,” said the victim, who headed
a committee against sexual harassment,
in her complaint to president and chief justice of India written on
August 1.
Meanwhile, Chief Justice of India has assured action after
he receives the complaint.
“I will seek a report from the Chief Justice of Madhya
Pradesh High Court and take action accordingly. I will do my best for the
institution,” Chief Justice of India RM Lodha was quoted as saying by Indian TV
news channel, NDTV.
Himachal Pradesh: Judge suspended for ‘sexual harassment’
First of its kind incident in the state's judiciary has come
as a big embarrassment for the High Court and senior judges in Himachal
Pradesh.
August 14, 2015
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has suspended a Chief Judicial
Magistrate on charges of sexual harassment of a colleague of same rank.
A senior official of the High Court on Thursday confirmed
that an inquiry has been instituted in this regard by Chief Justice Mansoor
Ahmad Mir, who has a taken strong exception to the alleged conduct of the
accused judge, terming it as an embarrassment for the entire judicial
fraternity.
The woman judge is learnt to have alleged that she was
sexually harassed ahead of a three-day national conference on drug abuse held
in Manali from June 11 to 13. The conference was attended by Supreme Court
judges and HC judges from different states. Sources said the alleged incident
happened on June 8.
The woman judge, who was part of an official team that was
looking into the arrangements for the conference in Manali, has reportedly
alleged she was asked by the accused judge to accompany him to a resort in
Manali. She also alleged that the colleague harassed and teased her.
The woman judge is learnt to have submitted a written
complaint in this regard. The accused judge, who is posted in Kullu, has
reportedly filed a counter-complaint against the woman judge.
Nothing but the truth
By Indira Jaising
A midst the rising din of the demand for death penalty for
rapists comes the news that three judges of the Karnataka High Court have been
involved in what has come to be described as a 'sex scandal' on the outskirts
of Mysore at a place called Roost Resorts.
Our attention is now directed to those who dispense justice
rather than those who knock at the doors of justice. In both cases, we are
talking about the use and abuse of women — those who are victims of sexual
abuse, and those who are used as sexual objects, willingly or unwillingly.
After the reports in local newspapers that three high court
judges were found with women at a resort, there was the usual crop of denials.
Although the Mysore police were called in to settle a brawl, on being told that
the persons in question were judges they said that they heard no evil and saw
no evil.
And everyone thought the matter ended there.
Attempts to get the names of the judges or of the women in
question drew a blank. The bar association also drew a blank as most people
said, "Don't quote me… but…"
On November 30, the Bangalore edition of The Times of India
published a front-page story giving the names and photographs of the three
judges and confirming that the Intelligence Bureau had done an investigation
and come to the conclusion that the incident had indeed occurred. There were
still no details of the incident, though it was stated that the report has been
given to the chief justice of India.
There were reports on the same day that the Karnataka High
Court chief justice had sought the transfer of the three judges to Patna, Jammu
and Kashmir and Guwahati. Apparently, the chief justice has agreed to this
request and the transfer orders have been issued.
Then came the news that the chief justice of India has set
up a committee of inquiry under the 'in-house' procedure consisting of the
chief justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the chief justice of the Madras
High Court and the chief justice of the Patna High Court.
There were still no details in the press about the actual
incident and the entire episode continued to be referred to as a 'sex scandal'.
What is interesting about these reports is not what they
reveal, but what they conceal. It is a conspiracy of silence. If the
information is now available to the chief justice of India, why is it not being
made public? Do we, the public, not have the right to information? Ironically,
the morning newspapers brought the news that the Freedom of Information Act has
been passed. What are the legitimate limits of the right to freedom of
information and the requirement of keeping information a secret? This episode
would make an interesting case study.
What exactly is at stake here? There is much that should
concern the nation about the incident. This is not a case about the private
morality of the judges, be that as it may, but about the abuse of office that
they hold. What has not been made known is that the three women in question are
women lawyers practising in their courts.
What is at stake here is the pollution of the stream of
justice at its very source. There must be countless cases in which these women
appeared before these very judges day in and day out of their routine practice.
Can one honestly say that in such a situation justice is being done
"without fear or favour"? Judges swear on oath of allegiance to
"bear true faith" to the Constitution and do justice "without
fear or favour". How well have these judges honoured this oath?
What is at stake here is the cynical use of women as sexual
commodities. The usual justifications have already begun making the rounds. If
the women have not complained, what objection can anyone else have, it is
asked. What is lost sight of is the fact that the judges are in a position of
dominance vis-à-vis the women, in a position to do favours that pertain to
their office.
What is at stake here is the cynical use of public office,
the seat of justice, for personal petty gain. It is irrelevant whether the
women consented or not. The usual blame game will now begin — blaming the
victim rather than the perpetrator; the usual loose talk about the character of
the woman in question; the usual attempt to cover up by diverting attention
from the actual incident to the motives of those who brought the incident to
light.
What is at stake here is the perception of women as sexual
commodities by those who are responsible for sitting in judgment over cases
brought for and on behalf of women.
The issues at stake here concern one half of Indians. With
what faith can Indian women approach the courts demanding the right to
equality, the right to be free from sexual harassment or rape and the right to
live with dignity, if the persecution of judges who sit in judgment over them
is non-negotiable?
In the circumstances, the suggested solution is worse than
the offence — to transfer them to Patna, Guwahati and Jammu and Kashmir. Why
these particular cities? Are they not an integral part of the country, or are
they mere islands within the country that are considered 'punishment postings'
where people are sent a la 'crossing Kala Pani' of the old days? To the credit
of the Guwahati Bar Association, it protested against the proposed transfer.
The only decent thing to do is for the chief justice of
India to disclose full details of the incident so that rumour-mongering comes
to an end. This would be in the best interest of the judiciary itself.
As things stand, the rumours are making the rounds that
there were more than three judges involved, that the women were professional
call girls, many of which are baseless. We, the people, have the right to know.
The conspiracy of silence must be broken.
The judges in question must neither be assigned any judicial
functions pending an inquiry nor be transferred to sit in judgment over others.
Two of the judges are stated to be additional judges. They must not be
confirmed. If there is prima facie evidence against the one remaining judge,
the chief justice must recommend his impeachment.
It is time for all concerned bar associations, bar councils
and other male-dominated bodies of legal professionals to act and ensure that
there is no cover-up. There is little point in showing sympathy to women in
judgments and in seminar rooms, or in recommending the death penalty for rape
if we cannot deal with the men who dispense justice.
There are contempt of court petitions pending in the
Karnataka High Court against some of the publications for disclosing details of
the incident. Civil society and women's organisations must demand that justice
is now done when it comes to the judges themselves.
The law of contempt can offer no solution to the crisis of
credibility in the judiciary that this incident has thrown up. One positive
aspect of the incident is that it is only after the chief justice of the high
court issued a public notice inviting information that he received 20
representations, which led to the discovery of the truth.
Let the truth now be made public.
Judge accused of molesting 2 rape survivors in UP
A sitting judicial magistrate sexually assaulted them
UP: Two rape victims claim that a sitting judicial
magistrate sexually assaulted them. The girls
alleged that when they went to the magistrate’s chamber to
give their statement, he allegedly
made them strip and molested them.
One of the girls is a minor and the police have filed a
complaint. The girls also claimed that the
judge threatened them to not speak of the incident to
anyone.
Lawyers and the general public in Gonda launched a protest
against the judge.
JUDGE SENDING OBSCENE SMS TO WOMEN
Lucknow Taking cognisance of the allegation against a civil
Judge (junior division) of
Budaun court that he sent obscene SMSes to a woman lecturer,
the Registrar General of
Allahabad High Court today sought a report from the district
judge into the matter.
The civil judge of Gunnor sub-division court of Budaun —
Pramod Kumar Gangwar— was
accused of sending obscene SMSes from his cellphone to a
woman lecturer of Classic
College of Law, Bareilly. A lecturer of the same college,
Vivek Gupta, was named in the FIR
lodged by the victim while Gangwar’s name surfaced in the
primary investigation.
Registrar General Dinesh Gupta said, “The district judge of
Budaun has been asked to
send a detailed report into the allegations. Appropriate
action would be taken on the basis
of the report.”
District Judge Suresh Kumar Srivastava said, “I have asked
the Bareilly district police to
send a report about the matter. The report on the basis of
the police inquiry would be sent
to the Allahabad High Court Registrar General.”
“I am not aware about the matter, as the Bareilly police did
not intimate me before initiating
the probe against the civil judge. They should have informed
me when they had received
any such complaint,” the judge added.
Meanwhile, Bareilly CO II Raj Kumar, who is investigating
the case, today recorded the
statement of the victim. “I have collected the call details
of the cellphone used for sending
the SMSes, but I have yet to get the address of the person
who is subscriber of the SIM
card,” he said.
“The probe is on to verify if the accused in the case were
present on the location recorded
in the call details when the SMSes were sent. The details of
the findings of the
investigation would be sent to the Budaun district court to
seek the direction,” the CO
added.
Asked if the investigation was earlier conducted into the
matter, Raj Kumar said, “The SP
(Crime) had initiated probe into the matter, but I am not
aware if the investigation had
reached to any conclusion.”
The woman lecturer had lodged an FIR at the Mahila police
station on Thursday alleging
she had received obscene SMSes on her cellphone involving
her colleague Vivek Gupta.
The preliminary inquiry into the case by the police
yesterday had found that the mobile
phone used in the crime belongs to the civil judge.
Lokayukta: DC demanded sex from widow
In the midst of a national outrage over former Haryana DGP
SPS Rathore molesting a teenager,
the Karnataka Lokayukta on Saturday made a startling
revelation that the state government was
shielding a top bureaucrat who had demanded sexual favours
from a young widow.
Lokayukta Justice Santosh Hegde disclosed that the official
concerned, who was the deputy
commissioner of one of the districts when he demanded sex
from the widow in return for
discharging his duties as public servant, has since been
promoted to a senior position.
Justice Hegde, in the course of an interaction with
journalists at the Deccan Herald office
Saturday afternoon, said the unnamed widow had dared the
deputy commissioner and
approached the Lokayukta’s office with a complaint against
the officer.
On examination of the complaint, the Lokayukta had found
sufficient grounds to recommend to
the state government the suspension and prosecution of the
DC concerned. The
recommendation was subsequently considered by the concerned
department head as well as
the chief secretary and both endorsed it.
But, according to Justice Hegde, no action was initiated
against the DC as the same official who
had endorsed the recommendation subsequently found no basis
for initiating departmental action
against him. Instead, the official cleared the DC’s name for
promotion in the super-scale.
Presently, the official holds a senior position in the
government.
The widow, in her late 20s, had approached the DC with a
representation to sort out some
problems. But she was shocked when the DC demanded sex.
Justice Hegde did not identify the official in question or
the complainant. Nor did he offer to name
the district where the official was serving as deputy
commissioner. But the incident has
happened sometime in the course of last three years as
Justice Hegde took over as the
Lokayukta in mid-2006.
3-year jail term for ‘dirty’ judge
Family court judge Ramrao Gangaram Bhise attempted to get
sexual favours from a housewife in
1997
Family court judge Ramrao Gangaram Bhise’s attempts to
extract sexual favours, in addition to a
bribe, from a housewife, Alka Gaikwad — who had sought an
increase in her monthly
maintenance allowance from her estranged husband, in 1997 —
proved costly to him.
Pronouncing him guilty on both counts, the special court
hearing anti-corruption bureau (ACB)
matters sentenced him to three years rigorous imprisonment
and a collective fine of Rs55, 000,
on Monday.
According to the FIR in the case registered against Bhise by
the ACB, Suryakant Gaikwad had
filed for divorce from his wife, Alka, before the Bandra
family court. Alka, a housewife, in turn,
filed a petition seeking mutual cohabitation with her
husband. The then family court judge, Meera
Khadakkar, directed the husband to pay her an interim
maintenance allowance of Rs750 per
month.
Subsequently, in January 1997, Alka filed another
application before the same family court (now
presided over by Bhise) seeking to increase the monthly
maintenance amount to Rs3,500. “On
October 27, 1997, Bhise issued an interim order, increasing
the maintenance allowance to
Rs2,000 to be paid by Suryakan to his estranged wife till
the disposal of the case. Immediately
after issuing the order, Bhise asked Alka to meet him and
gave her his residential telephone
number, asking her to call him when the court hours ended.
He told her that he would ask her
husband to pay her a lump sum of Rs2 lakh in addition to the
monthly maintenance, provided she
called him up,” the FIR states.
When she called up the judge at 7 pm the same day, Bhise
told her that she would have to pay
him a sum of Rs2,000 in addition to granting his sexual
favours if she wanted an order in her
favour. He also directed her to meet him at the Haji Ali bus
stop with the bribe amount the
following evening.
“Alka approached the ACB, which sought permission from the
Chief Justice of the Bombay High
Court before laying a trap on the first class judicial
magistrate (Bhise). The HC while granting the
permission designated a court official to bear witness to
the events leading to the trap. Alka,
under video camera surveillance of ACB sleuths, along with
the court official and other women
witnesses met Bhise at 8.30 pm at the Haji Ali bus stop.
Bhise took hold of Alka’s wrist and when
she protested, repeated his demands,” the FIR states.
Alka was then taken to a nearby hotel, Sharda, where the
judge accepted the bribe amount. But
before he could do anything else, ACB sleuths swooped in and
arrested him.
Rajasthan judge is indicted for seeking sexual favours
Chief Justice of India G B Pattanaik retires tonight and he
doesn’t have much to write home about
on the unprecedented drive he launched to enforce judicial
accountability.
After the PPSC scam fiasco, reported in The Indian Express
today, comes the case of the
Rajasthan judge who has been indicted in a sex scandal and
yet has escaped action—pending
another inquiry.
On December 14, a three-judge committee set up by Pattanaik
confirmed the ‘‘involvement’’ of
Justice Arun Madan of the Rajasthan High Court in a
proposition to a woman doctor to have sex
with him in exchange for a judicial favour.
The committee, headed by the Chief Justice of the Punjab and
Haryana High Court Justice B K
Roy, submitted its report to Pattanaik, indicting Madan on a
complaint made from Jodhpur by the
woman concerned, Sunita Malviya.
But Pattanaik has not announced any action against Madan.
When contacted by The Indian
Express, Pattanaik confirmed that the committee had indicted
Madan and his ‘‘bad reputation’’ in
seeking sexual favours in return for judicial ones.
However, Pattanaik said that no action was being taken since
the committee had also mentioned
allegations of corruption against Madan. And so he had
ordered a further inquiry by the same
committee into the corruption charges.
When asked what he did with the indictment of Madan in the
sex scandal, Pattanaik said, ‘‘That
is on hold because I could not have taken piecemeal action
against him….I am praying to God
that the final report will give some tangible material to
take action.’’
Highly placed sources told The Indian Express that when the
committee recorded statements last
week in Jodhpur of about 30 persons over four days, it also
came to know of several allegations
of corruption against Madan and another judge of the same
high court. The committee put these
on record as well.
Pattanaik said that when he summoned Madan to New Delhi last
week, he did not raise the sex
scandal issue and instead limited himself to saying that he
was ordering a further inquiry into
corruption allegations.
In effect, Pattanaik has now passed the Rajasthan buck to
his successor Justice V N Khare.
The gist of Malviya’s complaint is that Madan made a sexual
proposition to her in October
through a deputy registrar of the high court, Govind
Kalwani, who said that the judge would help
her, in turn, get out of a criminal case booked against her.
With this, Pattanaik’s much-touted in-house judicial
accountability seems to have hit a wall. The
first committee’s report into the PPSC scam exonerated one
judge despite evidence and let two
others off with a mere slap on the wrist. The third
committee is now busy probing the involvement
of judges in the Mysore sex scam.
Porbandar judge accused of dowry harassment
A complaint has been filed against District and Sessions
judge of Porbandar for allegedly
harassing his daughter-in-law for dowry, police said here on
Sunday.
Darshana Dave, a native of Amreli, has filed a complaint
against her husband Kinnar, father-inlaw
and district judge Arvind Dave, mother-in-law Pratibha and
brother-in-law Prashant, the
police added.
Darshana married Kinnar two years ago. Her complaint says
that she was harassed from the
beginning, and was even beaten up by the husband and
in-laws, who were demanding Rs 10
lakh as dowry.
She has also alleged that she was thrown out of the house a
few months back, and her husband
is now seeking divorce, the police said.
Amreli Superintendent of Police H R Muliyana confirmed to
have received the complaint against
the judge and others. He said that action will be taken
after verifying the complaint.
This is the second complaint related to dowry harassment
filed against a judge in the state in the
recent past.
Earlier, a woman had filed a complaint against additional
sessions judge of Jetpur after her
daughter and the judge's wife committed suicide.
Gurgaon judge to also face dowry harassment charge
Gurgaon's Chief Judicial Magistrate Ravneet Garg, booked for
the murder of his wife, will also
face dowry harassment charge, police here said Monday.
Police have issued notices to the CJM's father K.K. Garg and
mother Rachna Garg, who have
also been named in the dowry harassment case.
The CJM's father reached here Monday morning from Haryana's
Panchkula town and contacted
police, who wanted to question him.
"We had called CJM's parents...K.K. Garg was questioned
by special investigation team (SIT),"
Gurgaon Police Commissioner Alok Mittal said.
Mittal said on the basis of written complaint filed by the
parents of the CJM's wife Geetanjali,
penal sections of dowry harassment and extra-marital affair
were included in the FIR lodged
against the CJM Saturday.
Geetanjali, 24, bore three bullet wounds - on her chin,
chest and stomach - but no bullets were
found in her body that was recovered here Thursday. The
CJM's licensed firearm was found near
the body, police said.
Mittal said two bullets were seized from the scene of crime
and would be sent for ballistic
examination Monday, a day after ballistic experts examined
the crime spot.
"The SIT Sunday questioned two women relatives of
Ravneet Garg for hours at his government
allotted house here in the Officers Colony," said
Mittal.
"We have asked CJM to produce supporting evidences to
prove his statement," he said.
The CJM allegedly said that his driver and domestic help may
throw some light on his wife's
death.
Judge Garg's in-laws alleged that two cars were provided to
the accused on his and his family's
demand. Rs.2 lakh were also delivered to him at the time of
the admission of his daughters in
school in May.
Geetanjali's brother Pradeep Aggarwal Saturday lodged a
first information report against Garg
and his parents, accusing them of murder.
"Ravneet and Geetanjali got married in November 2007.
Everything was fine for a few years but
the attitude of Ravneet and his parents towards Geetanjali
started changing after she delivered
two baby girls (now aged around four and a half and three
years)," Aggarwal said in his
complaint.
He demanded a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation
(CBI) into his sister's murder.
sexual harassment: Intern moves SC for inquiry against
Justice Swatanter Kumar
New Delhi: A former law intern, who has made sexual
harassment allegations against Justice Swatanter Kumar, today moved the Supreme
Court seeking inquiry against the retired judge.
A bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam, before whom
the matter was mentioned for urgent hearing, agreed to take up the case on
January 15.
The intern, in the petition, challenged the apex court's
December 5, 2013 full court resolution in which it was decided that no complaint
against its retired judges will be entertained.
The petitioner also submitted that a proper forum be
constituted to conduct inquiry in such cases and her complaint be also looked
into by the apex court like it was done in the case of sexual harassment
allegations against Justice (retd) A K Ganguly.
The intern has made Justice Kumar, Secretary General of the
Supreme Court and Union of India parties in the case.
She submitted that Justice Kumar was a sitting judge at the
time of the alleged incident and the apex court must look into the complaint as
per Vishaka guidelines.
Justice Kumar, who is currently heading the National Green
Tribunal, has described the allegations as "incredulous and false"
and "some kind of conspiracy".
IB confirms Mysore
Roost Resort sex scandal
The Intelligence Bureau has provided the Centre with a
detailed account of the escapade
involving three Karnataka High Court judges on November 3 in
a resort on the outskirts of
Mysore, highly placed sources told The Times of India on
Friday.
According to a senior official, “Most of the information
sought has not only confirmed the veracity
of the incident but the government has crosschecked it with
another police agency. Both the
reports match.”
The incident was widely reported in the media. What has
surprised the Centre is the “dogged
refusal” of the Karnataka police to confirm the incident.
“Mysore Police Commissioner C.
Chandrasekhar first denied that the incident ever took
place. Only when a public notice was
issued through the high court registrar seeking information
on the Mysore scandal, did the facts
come out in the open. Public protest helped a lot,” says the
source.
What transpired at the resort, says the source, “cannot be
expected from anyone in civil society,
leave alone persons sworn to upholding the law”. According
to him, “The IB report consists of
unmentionable facts and also makes it amply clear that the
Mysore incident is not the first time
such things have happened. Can anyone expect upholders of
the law to pick a fight with people
who complained to the police when caught in a compromising
position?”
In a related development, Karnataka High Court Chief Justice
N.K. Jain has written to Chief
Justice of India Justice G.B. Pattanaik asking that three
judges be transferred. Jain has proposed
that Justice N.S. Veerabhadraiah be transferred to the Patna
High Court, Justice
Chandrasekharaiah to Jammu & Kashmir and Justice V.
Gopala Gowda to the Gauhati High
Court.
While Jain is understood not to have given any reasons,
highly placed sources say the proposal
for transfers is linked to the Mysore incident.
However, the source says that now the government is worried
about the appropriate “remedial
measures”. In such cases, transferring a judge to a remote
high court doesn’t always work. He
says, “Bar associations and the people of northeastern
states were up in arms when some
judges of the Punjab and Haryana high courts were
transferred there. We expect similar protests
if the CJI accepts Justice Jain’s proposal to transfer the
three judges of the Karnataka High
Court.”
The Bar Council of India on Friday, while expressing its anguish
at the Karnataka incident, called
for “follow-up action”.
“Unless prompt and appropriate action is taken, it will
erode the faith of public in the only
institution considered to be the bastion of our fighting
faith in democracy,” it said in a statement.
The BCI has “lamented” inaction in this case by “the higher
judiciary and the government”.
Panel names former India Supreme Court judge Ganguly in sex
harassment allegation
Shocked, shattered by allegations: former Supreme Court
judge Ganguly
New Delhi: A three-member panel that probed the charge of
sexual harassment of a young lawyer by a Supreme Court judge has submitted its
report, identifying the judge as A K Ganguly, court sources said on Friday.
The report was submitted on Thursday after the committee of
three judges met six times. This is the first time an alleged perpetrator has
been named.
The report, submitted to Chief Justice P Sathasivam, also
carries the statements of the victim, who interned in the Supreme Court, and
that of the now-retired Justice Ganguly, the sources said.
The graduate of Kolkata-based National University of
Judicial Sciences (NUJS) had alleged sexual harassment by Ganguly while
interning for him in December 2012.
The committee, which held six sittings on November 13, 19,
21, 26, and 27, submitted its report to Chief Justice Sathasivam on November
28.
The victim appeared before the committee on November 19 and
was expected to appear again on November 21 but chose to stay away.
She first mentioned the incident in a blog for Journal of
Indian Law and Society on November 6 and later told the same in an interview
with Legally India website.
The victim, who is working with Natural Justice: Lawyers for
Communities and Environment, said she heard that there were three other girls
besides her who were sexually harassed by the same judge.
She also claimed to have knowledge of four more girls who
were allegedly harassed by other judges in their chambers.
Denying any sexual harassment, Ganguly on Friday said he was
“shocked and shattered” by the charges against him.
“I am denying everything. I have told the committee that all
the allegations levelled by the intern are wrong. I don’t know how such
allegations have been levelled against me,” he said.
“I am a victim of situations,” he told television channels.
“I am not ashamed of anything,” he said in reply to a
question regarding the alleged episode which came out in public after the
victim spoke about it in the legal portal earlier this month.
He said the charges against him were totally wrong. The girl
had not raised any sexual harassment issue with him, he said, adding that he
had not done any physical harm to her.
The former judge said the intern worked with him though she
was not officially allocated to him. She came in the place of another intern
who had gone abroad after marriage. “I never put up a poster. She came on her
own.”
He said the girl had come to his house on a number of
occasions in connection with work.
Judge issues memo to lady office assistant for not washing
his innerwear
Chennai: Disgusting but true, a judge in Tamil Nadu sent a
memo to a court employee threatening her of disciplinary action as the latter
refused to wash innerwear piled up in his house. However, the judge refusing to
budge down to criticism has justified his move by stating that office
assistants are "meant for menial work".
A subordinate judge in Erode, Justice Selvam forced his
47-year-old office assistant to apologise in writing and assure that she would
not repeat her "lapse".
The memo, dated February 1 reads: "Please explain
within 7 days why disciplinary action should not be initiated against you for
your failure to wash the innerwear which were put for washing in the
sub-judge's house, and for throwing them away disgustingly, and when your
attitude was questioned by the officer and his wife for retorting in an
arrogant tone," the note said.
Those close to the woman say the lady, who is a mother of
two daughters and the only earning member of the family was hired as an
assistant at the court but was forced to sweep, wash, cook and serve at the
judge's home.
Many say that the lady is verbally abused by the judge's
wife.
Justice Selvam is quoted in NDTV saying that he has done
nothing wrong.
"She is an Officer's Assistant appointed to do menial
work. I had given only my vest and not underwear. It's clearly given in the
Judicial Officers' Association guidelines," he said.
Eight chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister
Dhananjay Mahapatra| TNN | Sep 17, 2010,
NEW DELHI: Former law minister Shanti Bhushan on Thursday
created a sensation in the Supreme Court when he moved an application accusing
eight former Chief Justices of India of "corruption", and dared the
court to send him to jail for committing "contempt of court".
The eight allegedly corrupt CJIs feature among a list of 16
prepared by Bhushan—comprising Justices Ranganath Mishra, K N Singh, M H Kania,
L M Sharma, M N Venkatachalliah, A M Ahmadi, J S Verma, M M Punchhi, A S Anand,
S P Bharucha, B N Kirpal, G B Patnaik, Rajendra Babu, R C Lahoti, V N Khare and
Y K Sabharwal. Terming eight among the list as "definitely corrupt",
Bhushan put their names in a sealed cover and submitted it to the Supreme Court
and virtually dared it to open it and read out the contents.
He said of the 16 on his list, "six were definitely
honest and about the remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed
whether they were honest or corrupt".
The veteran lawyer, who became famous by successfully
arguing for setting aside the election of Indira Gandhi in 1975, triggering a
chain of events leading to imposition of Emergency, resorted to the dramatic
action in solidarity with his son, lawyer Prashant Bhushan, who is facing
contempt charges for accusing current CJI S H Kapadia and his predecessors of
misconduct.
"Make me a party along with Prashant Bhushan,"
requested Bhushan Sr, who was law minister in the post-Emergency Morarji Desai
cabinet, as he challenged the SC to send him to jail for contempt.
Bhushan's challenge to the SC can put the apex court in a
bind. It may be constrained not to ignore the provocation lest it start a
trend. The option of punishing the Bhushans, however, carries the risk of
putting the father-son duo on a pedestal, and training the spotlight on their
allegations when the issue of judicial corruption finds ready resonance with an
expanding constituency. Of all the protests against alleged judicial
corruption, the Bhushans's is easily the most breathtaking, and will play well
with the gallery.
Bhushan sought to raise for judiciary the cost of any
punishment to him, by saying that he was ready to face the consequences.
"The applicant will consider it a great honour to spend time in jail for
making an effort to get for the people of India an honest and clean
judiciary," he said.
In his application, the former law minister spoke of both
the growing corruption in judiciary as well as the tendency to sweep it under
the carpet in the name of protecting judiciary's reputation.
A defiant Bhushan claimed that two former CJIs were among
the sources of his information on corruption among their peers. "In fact,
two former CJIs had personally told the applicant while they were in office
that their immediate predecessor and immediate successor were corrupt judges.
The names of these four CJIs are included in the list of corrupt CJIs,"
Bhushan said.
"Unless the level of corruption in the judiciary is
exposed and brought in the public domain, the institutions of governance cannot
be activated to take effective measures to eliminate the evil," he added.
"It is a common perception that whenever such efforts
are made by anyone, the judiciary tries to target him by the use of the power
to contempt. It is the reputation of the judge which is his shield against any
malicious and false allegations against him. He does not need the power of
contempt to protect his reputation and credibility," Bhushan further said.
Proceedings against Prashant were initiated on a petition
filed by amicus curiae Harish Salve accusing the former of making contemptuous
remarks against CJI S H Kapadia and former CJIs. Besides, Bhushan Jr had also
told a web newspaper that half of the last 16 former CJIs were corrupt.
His father, Shanti Bhushan said, "Since the applicant
(Shanti Bhushan) is publicly stating that out of the last 16 CJIs, eight of
them were definitely corrupt, he also needs to be added as a respondent to this
contempt petition so that he is also suitably punished for this contempt."
Corruption in judiciary had taken firm root in the last two
to three decades, Bhushan said while deploring persistent attempts to cover up
in the belief that such charges might tarnish the image of the judiciary.
Assailing the Supreme Court's decision in 1991 in the
Justice Veeraswamy case restraining probe agencies from registering FIR against
any judge without the permission of the CJI, Bhushan said this had resulted in
total immunity to corrupt judges and caused judicial corruption to increase by
leaps and bounds.
Rs 100 crore offered for Gali Janardhan Reddy’s bail: Arrested
judge
More skeletons are tumbling out in the murky cash-for-bail
scam involving mining baron and former Karnataka minister Gali Janardhan Reddy
as a lower court judge, arrested in the case, disclosed to the ACB that Gali's
men were ready to offer as much as a staggering Rs 100 crore to secure bail for
him. Earlier, the deal amount was put at Rs 15 crore.
T Lakshminarasimha Rao, the arrested judge, disclosed that
Dasaradharami Reddy, a relative of Gali, had made the Rs 100 crore offer,
according to the confession statement recorded by the ACB. Krishna Prasad, an
auditor, who is known to him and another relative M Venkateswara Rao approached
Lakshminarasimha Rao in the second week of April with a request to look for a
`channel' to influence the CBI judge for Gali's release on bail. "They
were in touch with Dasaradharami Reddy who was willing to pay even Rs 100 crore
for securing the bail," the confession statement of Rao said. Though the
deal initially came as a shock to the arrested judge, who at the time was
registrar (enquiries), high court, he was later attracted towards the deal, it
said.
Lakshminarasimha Rao called the CBI court judge B Nagamaruti
Sarma to his residence on April 18 and tried to convince him on granting of
bail to Gali. Sarma did not agree for the deal and went away rejecting the
offer. He had, in fact, dismissed the bail plea. Then another person Raavi
Surya Prakash Babu, a real estate dealer, who was taken to Bellary MLA
Sriramulu by his associate Kolli Lakshmaiah Chowdary for striking the deal,
approached Rao again. Surya Prakash had already met Sriramulu's nephew and
Kampli MLA T H Suresh Babu who, too, was trying to secure bail for Gali and
advised him to wait as Nagamaruti Sarma was not of 'their type'. But he
requested Lakshminarasimha Rao to keep the `channel' open as the deal was
"too lucrative to be ignored".
Later, in a strange sequence of events, Nagamaruti Sarma was
shifted out of CBI court and a fresh bail plea was filed which came before
another special judge T Pattabhirama Rao. Lakshminarasimha Rao roped in
Pattabhi's batchmate D Prabhakar Rao, another district judge, who was with the
state election commission as its secretary (legal). He also tried to push the
deal but failed as Pattabhi told him that he would decide the matter on only
`merit'. It turned out later that Pattabhi chose a 'route' planned by his
friend Chalapati though the deal was only for Rs 5 crore. This was mainly
because his friend did not put any precondition that he should meet Gali
Somasekhara Reddy, brother of Gali Janardhana Reddy, before giving bail as was
done by Prabhakar Rao, who was also arrested in the case. Prabhakar in his
confession spoke of only Rs 15 core implying that he too was unaware of the
whopping Rs 100-crore deal. While the ACB arrested Lakshminarasimha Rao on July
12, Pattabhi was arrested last month.
Interestingly, the ACB sleuths seized some cheques bearing
the names of Lakshminarasimha Rao's family members with some complaint letters
written by advocates against some AP high court judges. The letters were
addressed to the President of India.
CASH FOR JUDGEMENT
Chandigarh, August 22: Punjab and Haryana High Court Judge
Nirmal Yadav who has gone on leave after her name is said to have figured in
the statements of the main accused in the case involving the delivery of cash
at another High Court Judge’s house, said today that she was a “victim of a
vilification campaign.” Speaking to The Indian Express at her Sector 24
residence here today, Justice Yadav said that “some influential persons were
trying to shift the focus on her to save the real accused.” Justice Yadav
denied that former Haryana Additional Advocate General Sanjeev Bansal had
talked to her on phone on August 13 when Bansal’s clerk “mistakenly” delivered
a bag containing Rs 15 lakh to the residence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, another
sitting Judge of the High Court.
“Let any agency prove that I talked to Sanjeev Bansal on
phone either on that day or any day in the past one month,” Justice Yadav said.
“I am ready to face all consequences if this allegation is found true. I have
had no dealings with Bansal. I have not received any money from Bansal or any
of his associates. I am sure I will get justice.” Justice Yadav said she had
explained her position to High Court Chief Justice T S Thakur and had
“proceeded on leave.” She said she would not hear any case until her name is cleared.
Sources close to her said that during her meeting with
Justice Thakur yesterday evening, in which some other senior judges were also
present, Justice Yadav offered to proceed on leave to “maintain the highest
traditions of Indian judiciary.” Justice Thakur told The Indian Express that he
had not asked Justice Yadav to proceed on leave and that it was her own
decision. It is learnt that in her meeting with Justice Thakur, Yadav
vehemently denied any role in the entire role. While acknowledging that she and
some other members of her family had bought a plot of 11.1 bighas of land (see
accompanying story) at village Rihun Pargana near Kumharhatti in Solan district
of Himachal Pradesh on August 14, Yadav is learnt to have denied that the money
for purchasing the land came from Bansal or Ravinder Singh, the Delhi
businessman, who is also named in the case.
“Can’t a judge buy legal property? Let the police or any
other investigating agency prove that the money for the deal was provided by
Bansal or Singh,” she is learnt to have told the Chief Justice. But she is
learnt to have acknowledged, in her meeting with the Chief Justcie, that she
knew Ravinder Singh. She is learnt to have said that she came to know him
through some other judges.
Meanwhile, highly placed sources in the High Court confirmed
that Chief Justice Thakur is awaiting the return of Chief Justice of India KG
Balakrishnan from Brazil to apprise him of the developments in the case. The
Chief Justice is learnt to have asked the administrative committee, comprising
senior judges, to monitor the case on a daily basis.
The Rs 15-lakh delivery: Story So Far
•August 13: Parkash Ram, an assistant to Haryana’s
Additional Advocate General Sanjeev Bansal, delivers a parcel containing Rs 15
lakh at the residence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur of the Punjab and Haryana High
Court. Justice Kaur calls the police.
•Rajeev Gupta, Bansal’s friend and a property dealer, tells
the police that the money reached there by mistake and it was meant for Nirmal
Singh, another property dealer. Chandigarh Police decline to hand over the
cash. Bansal is questioned
•August 16: A case is registered against Bansal, Parkash Ram
and Delhi- based hotelier Ravinder Singh who allegedly organised the money
•Bansal resigns as Addl AG and surrenders on August 19
•August 21: Rajeev Gupta, the property dealer who claimed
the money was meant for Nirmal Singh, is arrested. The Inspector General of
Police sends a report to the Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court.
The report says that the money was meant for another judge.
•August 22: Justice Nirmal Yadav proceeds on leave
Caught in controversy is Solan plot that judge, 16 others
purchased
CHANDIGARH, SOLAN, August 22: On August 14, according to
revenue records, a plot measuring 11.1 bighas in Solan was purchased by Justice
Nirmal Yadav and others for Rs 5, 52, 500. Details of the transaction, obtained
by The Indian Express, show that the land was purchased by her and 16 others
from six persons, all residents of village Rihun Pargana, near Kumharhatti in
the Solan district of Himachal Pradesh.
This purchase is said to have figured in the meeting between
Justice Yadav and the High Court Chief Justice yesterday. Justice Yadav is said
to have told the Chief Justice: “Can’t a judge buy legal property? Let the
police or any other investigating agency prove that the money for the deal was
provided by (Sanjeev) Bansal or Ravinder Singh.” The purchasers and sellers
obtained permission from the Himachal Pradesh Government under Section 118 of
the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy Act. Solan Naib Tehsildar N S Chauhan has
confirmed on record that that the deal had been registered as per the details
we have. The land was sold by residents of village including Baldev; Narinder
Kumar; Surinder Kumar; Rajinder Kumar; Bimla Devi and Amar Singh. The sellers
have given a General Power of Attorney to Surinder Kumar (one of the partners
among the sellers), who executed a sale agreement in favour of the buyers.
Those named as purchasers (partners) in the land deal include
Suruchi, a resident of House no. 3, Sector 14, Gurgaon; Trisha Chaudhary; Ram
Niwas; Rajender Yadav; Chiranjeev; Latika; Deepak; Sunita; Vivek; Capt. NT
Puri; Devinder Singh; Shakuntla; Kuldip Singh Yadav; Ajay Yadav; Sushank Puri;
Mohit (all residents of house no. 1111, Sector 11, Panchkula) and Punjab and
Haryana High Court Justice Nirmal Yadav.
In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul alleges graft by
SC judges, Congress
Feb 17, 2017
New Delhi: Late Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Kalikho Pul
had named some sitting as well as former Supreme Court judges and senior
Congress politicians in a 60-page suicide letter he left behind at the time of
his death last August. His wife has demanded a CBI probe into the corruption
charges levelled by Pul. "We want a central investigation agency -- the
CBI or the National Investigation Agency -- to investigate the case. Every
politician and judge named in the letter should be brought into limelight and
action taken against them for demanding bribe," his wife Dangwimsai Pul
told the media here.
The suicide note written by Kalikho Pul in Hindi mentions
the names of several Congress politicians both at the Centre and in Arunachal
Pradesh along with Supreme Court judges, including ex-Chief Justices of India
H.L Dattu and Altamas Kabir, for demanding bribe. Dangwimsai -- the first wife
of Pul -- has demanded a new FIR in the case as the state government did not
probe the death of Pul "properly", despite an FIR by the family. She
alleged the current state government threatened her against demanding a CBI
probe. On being asked who was threatening them, Dangwimsai told IANS: "I
can't take the names, but certainly they are people close to the ministers in
the current Arunachal government." In his 60-page suicide note, a copy of
which is with IANS, Pul said H.L. Dattu was allegedly paid Rs 28 crore in 2012
to stay an order against the former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Nabam
Tuki, despite the Gauhati High Court ordering a CBI inquiry against Tuki after
finding him guilty. Similarly, another ex CJI Altamas Kabir had given a
decision in favour of Arunachal contractors regarding a Public Distribution
System (PDS) scam. The Central government and Food Corporation of India termed
the decision wrong, he alleged in the letter. Pul also alleges that on the
directions of former Chief Minister Dorjee Khandu, he in 2009 had given Rs 6
crore to President Pranab Mukherjee, then Union Finance Minister. Mukherjee was
paid the money after he cleared an advance loan of Rs 200 crore to Arunachal
Pradesh. "In 2008, I, on the directions of Dorjee Khandu, was compelled to
give Rs 37 crore to Congress Treasurer Moti Lal Vora," said the suicide
note. The suicide note which brings to light several irregularities and scams
in Arunachal Pradesh also mentions that Pul was contacted by some
(unidentified) people, demanding Rs 86 crore to give a SC ruling in his favour,
an offer which Pul said he denied. Pul had become Chief Minister on February
19, 2016, after he along with 29 (19 Congress and 11 BJP) MLAs defected to the
People's Party of Arunachal Pradesh (PPA) -- a state outfit -- to form a new
government, bringing down the existing Congress government led by Chief
Minister Tuki. However, the Supreme Court reinstated the Tuki government on
July 13, following which Pul and his supporters returned to the Congress and
supported Pema Khandu as the Chief Minister. According to the letter, Pul was
contacted till 9 p.m on July 12, 2016, demanding an advance of Rs 9 crore to
delay the hearing for one month. Pul was unseated from the chief ministership
on July 13. The 47-year-old leader was found hanging from a ceiling fan on
August 9 in the official residence of the Chief Minister. He had yet to vacate
the bungalow. The Arunachal Police had found a 60-page letter written by Pul
near his body, titled 'Mere Vichar' (My Views). The letter also accuses two
sitting judges of the Supreme Court of corruption. "Virender Khehar
(relative of a serving judge), had asked for Rs 49 crore from me. In another
case Aditya Mishra (relative of another serving judge) had asked Rs 37 crore
from me," said the letter. Mentioning extreme manipulations through money
in the Supreme Court while giving important verdicts, Pul said he was contacted
till July 25, 2016 -- more than a week after the July 13 verdict -- by the kin
of a serving Supreme Court juge with an offer to change the decision of the
Supreme Court in his favour for Rs 31 crore. The suicide letter -- which appears
to be written over a period of a month and with his signature on each page --
clearly expresses the frustration and helplessness of Pul towards the
government and judiciary. In the letter, Pul has accused Arunachal Chief
Minister Pema Khandu and ex-CM Nabam Tuki as being among the few people
responsible for bringing the state into financial ruin. The suicide note states
that the entire expenses of Rs 90 crore for the case -- to unseat him -- in the
Supreme Court was borne by former and current Chief Minister Nabam Tuki and
Pema Khandu. The letter also names Congress leaders Kapil Sibal, Kamal Nath,
Ghulam Nabi Azad, Salman Khurshid and V. Narayanasamy as demanding money to
resolve problems among the Congress legislators in Arunachal Pradesh.
A – Z of Manipulation
of Indian Legal
System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
High Court
Judges Favoring Land
Mafia
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/hc-judges-favoring-mafia
PIL –
Fundamental Duties of
Citizens Vs Corrupt Government Officials
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT
PETITION NO. OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion
of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief
Justice of India & Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER
ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR
ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's
Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Fundamental Duties of
Citizens and Constitutional Duties of
Public Servants are complementary to each other. Nowadays
criminalization of politics , judiciary
, police , etc has taken place
and many unfit candidates are in public service. These corrupt , unfit public
servants are misusing their offices
and putting legal seal
on illegal acts , making those
illegal acts technically legal. Here
raises the conflict between
FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF AN INDIAN CITIZEN
and ILLEGAL ACTS
OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.
For example
real estate mafia grabs BEML Quarters
lake , Kaynes Hootagalli Lake , Ningaih
lake , Hebbal lakes in mysuru creates fake title deeds and
even gets it registered by sub
registrar all with the help corrupt
officials in government. Even police protect the rich
land grabber. When a case is made out in the court of law for eviction of lake encroachers , judge
simply goes through the technicalities of government documents. Based on official documents he gives a green signal to encroacher and orders
for protection of his encroached
properties. Lakes are
nobody’s property , it is a
public property and to be preserved for public usage. The good Samaritan Indian Citizen who did
his “Fundamental Duties of Protecting Lakes “ lost money , time, faced
abuses / remarks from the judge , faced life threat from land mafia
& police. All for nothing.
One more example ,
a citizen while passing through a public
road witnesses an accident , takes the injured to the
hospital for emergency treatment to save life and informs police regarding accident making vehicle.
Instead of appreciating his good work
, police fits him in the case , case
drags on for years making the good citizen loose his money , time & job.
Also , he is threatened by vehicle owner
who made the accident , no protection to
the citizen for doing his :Fundamental Duties”.
One more
example , a citizen complained to authorities
regarding business of a liquor
bar in a residential location much close to religious building & schools. The bar owner had
secured license from state excise
department much against the norms.
Police called the good citizen for questioning repeatedly , court judge called him to court repeatedly and finally based on the license given by
corrupt government official allowed the
bar to operate , fined the
complainant. Goons of bar owner roughed up the good citizen making him to
move away from the locality itself.
An Indian
citizen requests for information from authorities regarding
llegalities , irregularities , misuse of office in working
by judges , police , etc from supreme court of india and other related
authorities under RTI Act. So that based
on RTI reply from concerned authorities he can legally prosecute the guilty judges , police , public servants
, can get the injustices rectified by
court of law and put an end to further
crimes by those guilty , corrupt public servants all in public interest.
This is an effort by that Indian citizen
as his “FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES” to uphold
law , constitution of india. But PIOs ,
RTI Appellate authorities of supreme court of india
& other bodies didn’t give full truthful information at all .
Thereby , they committed one more crime of of covering up another crime and aiding criminals to continue with their
crimes unabated. Thereby , guilty judges
, police , other public servants obstructed the
citizen from performing his FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES , Violated his
FUNNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &
HUMAN RIGHTS TO
EQUITABLE JUSTICE. No justice in sight till date to good
Samaritan Indian citizen , more
injustices were meted out to him by judges , police , public servants - he suffered
physical assaults , murder attempts , jobs denied , news paper closed ,
press accreditation denied , PILS
he sent to apex court were not admitted , all to
silence him.
In this way ,
there are numerous cases of Indian Citizens , whistle blowers , RTI
Activists , Journalists who themselves
suffered gross injustices for raising
public causes , for doing their
Fundamental Duties. No Justice to
them even from apex court till date.
Every citizen of india must
perform his / her
“Fundamental Duties” without fail,
before demanding his fundamental rights.
Every public servant must do their
constitutional duties without fail.
A citizen
performs fundamental duties without any
rewards or pay or perks where as a
government official / public servant
does his / her duties for huge pay & perks.
A
citizen while performing his fundamental
duties often has to spend his own money
, time to fight legal cases , etc.
Whereas a public servant spends nothing during the course of his public duties,
everything is borne by state exchequer.
A citizen while performing his fundamental duties faces rowdy elements ,
physical assaults in few instances even
resulting in his own murder. His family
doesn’t get even a penny compensation from exchequer. Whereas a public servant
enjoys the full police protection in the course of his duties and even if anything untoward happens his family will get compensation.
Obstructing a Citizen
from performing his fundamental duties
doesn’t attract any legal
prosecution whereas obstruction of
public servant’s constitutional duties
is a crime under IPC.
2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Fundamental Duties
of Indian Citizens
Supreme or the
Illegal acts , orders by corrupt
Government officials (Legalizing illegal
acts) Supreme ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt
judges , police , public servants
responsible for injustices ,
obstructions to Fundamental Duties of citizens.
4. Averment:
Please read details
at :
Traitors in
Judiciary & Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,
Crimes by Khaki
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki
FIRST Answer Judges
Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police
SHAME SHAME JUDGEs
- Atrocities against DALITs
by Judges
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-judges ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/shame-shame-judges
“There is a higher court than the court of justice and that
is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”
- Mahatma Gandhi
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India
to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the
cases mentioned at above web sites , to perform their duties
& to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has
sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other
courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting
them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even
acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges
are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens ,
common men & see how careless our judges are towards anti national crimes ,
crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has
not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court
or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court
may be pleased:
1. To make
obstruction of “Fundamental
Duties of an Indian Citizen” a legally
punishable offence on par with the
obstruction of a public servant’s duties.
2. To pay
compensation of Rupees Two Crores and above
to RTI Activists , Whistle
Blowers , Journalists , ordinary citizens who paid with their lives or
suffered injuries in the course of
their fundamental duties.
3. To order for inspection , investigation of each &
every issue raised by a citizen in the
course of his fundamental duties instead
of simply relying on government records alone prepared by corrupt officials.
4. To order
all public servants including judges , Members of Parliament , Members of
Legislative Assemblies , IAS officers ,
other public servants to do their constitutional duties as well as their FUNDAMENTAL
DUTIES properly.
5. To admit all the
PILs sent by me to supreme court of
india and to order the concerned public
servants to give proper reply to all RTI Appeals made by me.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY
BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated : 26.02.2017……… ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
Traitors in Judiciary & Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,
Crimes by Khaki
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki
FIRST Answer Judges
Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police
“There is a higher court than the court of justice and that
is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”
- Mahatma Gandhi
RTI Appeals Not
Answered by SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA
- Crimes Cover-up
To ,
RTI Appellate Authority ,
O/O Chief Justice of
India ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.
APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
FULL NAME OF THE
APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE
APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE
& SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA
PIN – 570017.
"Power will go
to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be
of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly
hearts. They will fight among themselves
for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even
air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the
House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly ,
the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our
criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police , public servants
& Judges. Some of the below mentioned
judges fall among the category of
churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI
, information was denied citing unavailability.
If at all information is not truly available , why didn’t the CPIO
TRANSFER rti application to
concerned departments of SCI , Ministry
of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess
SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis
they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR
can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that
person to share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately
arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation
to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to
hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes
even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police &
judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national security ,
integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges
& Police above Law ? Is Judge’s MAFIA at
play ?
The action of
CPIO SCI amounts
to cover up of judges & their
crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also
CPIO & RTI First Appellate
Authority SCI have repeatedly committed
crimes by covering up
judges & their crimes.
Billions of indians are barely
sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling
hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to
them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw
pay & perks
amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us
still not do their constitutional duties
properly.
GIVE WHAT
ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN
AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED
IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few
in public service , Judiciary , police ,
parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted
respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY
REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
– WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I
AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST
RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR
TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE
AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE
SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM
IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police
,
Atrocities on Women
by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A – Z of
Manipulation of Indian
Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam -
Are you DEAF
DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind
,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs
& MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers
of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice
,
RTI &
Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a
,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Hereby , we do
request CPIO O/O
Honourable Chief Justice of India
, Supreme Court of India , New
Delhi to answer the following questions
in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to
legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police.
Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even became judges
through devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary &
perks from public exchequer and
accountable to public as any other
common man is.
Please give following
information :
Main A :
1. Please give me
The address of salary disbursing officer
in supreme court of india. Salary disbursing officer will be maintaining
service records of all employees of
supreme court of india including judges. These records are used for
disciplinary action , promotion , transfer of judges. If not within SCI ,
please give the address of the outside
public official who maintains service records of supreme court judges and kindly compile information from him and give it to me orelse
transfer my RTI application to him.
2. Please give me
the list of serving as well as retired supreme court judges with allegations
against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal
prosecution or not taking action.
3. Please give me
the list of serving as well as retired
high court judges with
allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking
action / criminal prosecution or not
taking action.
4. Please give me
the list of serving as well as retired
district & taluk court judges
with allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking
action / criminal prosecution or not
taking action.
5. Some of the high
courts are demanding higher RTI application fees than stipulated by law. Eventhough requisite fees has been paid
before transfer of RTI application to high courts. Please give me the
details of action taken by supreme court of india against erring high courts.
6. Give me the List
of petitions with date made by Shri . Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi
alias Nagaraja M R TO SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA THROUGH POST , THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH website
of DPG / DARPG. Action taken or not taken with reasons
thereof with respect to each petition.
7. Please give me
list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india , to safe guard the HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of Nagaraja M R editor of SOS e Clarion of
Dalit & SOS e Voice for justice. He
repeatedly appealed to SCI highlighting
violations of his human rights & fundamental rights. After appealing
to SCI only editor Nagaraja M R suffered
more injustices , attempts on his life , etc
, may be JUDGE’s MAFIA is in deal with outside MAFIA. Police are
helpless & practically don’t have
power to question supreme court judges & other VVIPs. Did SCI
constitute SCI monitored enquiry committee
with full legal authority to look into the issue.
8. Judges preach
too much & practice less. They give
lectures , judgements running
into hundreds of pages eliciting legality, moral virtues , humanity
, etc. But cover up information leading
to crimes / accountability of judges.
The judges committee like a mafia deals it within without subjecting the accussed judge to
public scrutiny & public trial. It is almost similar to a whore / bitch
giving a lecture on virginity to
women. To refresh your memory , Please
go through following websites
to know about facts , actual
cases of crimes by judges. Please give
us information regarding action taken or
not taken with reasons there of with respect
to each case mentioned in the following
websites:
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police
,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System
,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal
,
9. Please give me
the list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india to
safeguard the human rights of prisoners
, witnesses & evidences .
10. Please give me
the list of actions , follow up actions taken by high courts
of india to safeguard the human rights of
prisoners , witnesses & evidences .
11. Please give me
the list of supreme court judges , high court judges & district / taluk
judges (both serving & retired) who
received favourable allotment of sites , etc
which is nothing but a form of kick back
for favours shown by judge.
Please give me the list of action taken or not taken by supreme court of india with reasons
thereof in each case.
12. Please give me
the list of action taken against by
supreme court of india against CPIO &
PIO of supreme court of
india , who repeatedly failed to
give me information . thereby , CPIO
& PIO are covering up crimes of guilty judges , violating RTI Act &
violating human rights / fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja M R together
with public.
Main B :
1 . How many judges
are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women , irregularities ,
amassing disproportionate wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal allotment
of sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ?
2. what action taken casewise ?
3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people
committing same type of crimes ?
4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to
review , retrial by other honest judges ?
5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for
influencing witnesses / evidences , for tutored / concocted evidences , etc
since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were
prosecuted by court for influencing , intimidating witnesses through threats ,
3rddegree torture , for concocted evidences , etc since independence till date
, yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
7. how many police / law enforcement officials were prosecuted for lock-up deaths , fake
encounters , illegal detention , 3rd degree torture , etc since independence
till date , yearwise ? what action ? if
not why ?
8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were
made to pay compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly charged ,
detained & tortured , murdered by police , since independence till date ,
yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the judgement of lower court. In
how many such cases , lower court judge is made to pay compensation to victims of their wrong judgement , since
independence till date yearwise ? what
action ? if not why ?
10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their
annual financial returns giving out
their wealth , income details , yearwise since
independence till date ? what action ? if not why ?
11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of
judges ?
12. since independence , how many convicts have been
sentenced to “death by hanging” , yearwise ?
13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many
are pending ?
14. how many police officials were made to pay
compensation & prosecuted for
defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police were acquitted , dropped
from charges by courts ? if not why ?
15. how many lower court judges were made to pay
compensation & prosecuted for defamation , when innocents wrongly convicted by lower court , but on
appeal higher courts acquitting , dropping them of charges ? if not why ?
16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for
their expenses on liquor / alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA
DA bill while on
tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges ?
17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare ,
violation of human & fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood ,
etc were made to supreme court of india
, by nagaraja mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till
date ? appeals were made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail &
by web through DARPG , DPG. What ACTION
taken by supreme court of india with
respect to each appeal ?
18. due to negligence
/ connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted out to public & public are still suffering
injustices. Crimes which could have been prevented by SC happened eventhough
brought to early notice of supreme court. What action against erring SC Judges
? if not why ?
19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court
of india , to apprehend criminals
within judiciary , police &
public service. What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not why ?
20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence /
connivance of SCI judges I have suffered murder attempts on my life ,
job losses , my newspaper closed , not getting press accreditation to my web
news papers , threats by rowdies , police , etc. what action against erring
chief justice of india ? if not why ?
21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to
permit me to appear as amicus curie before supreme court of india & jain commission of enquiry regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination
case. I was not permitted why ?
22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination
case ? what action taken ? if not why ?
23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law interpretation is not same
for common people , Judges &
Police ? why ?
NOTE : PLEASE TAKE
NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO
PROVIDE INFORMATION , JUSTICE TO EDITOR
NAGARAJA M R LEADS
TO THE THREAT TO THE LIFE ,
LIVLIHOOD OF HIMSELF & HIS WHOLE
FAMILY. YOU ARE
LIABLE TO PAY COMPENSATION.
DON’T TRANSFER THIS CASE ,
APPLICATION TO POLICE THEY DON’T HAVE
POWER TO ENQUIRE JUDGES LET ALONE TAKE ACTION. PLEASE ENTRUST THE CASE TO TRANSPARENTLY CONSTITUTED SUPREME
COURT MONITORED ENQUIRY COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE WHOLE ISSUE.
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given
above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly
called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the
losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc
must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly
called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for
questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station
for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one
sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job ,
meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper
medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue officials , District
Magistrate & Chief Justice of India
together with above mentioned accused public servants will be responsible for
it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my
dependents to silence me , this complaint
is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our
fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves ,
If anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural
deaths , etc happens to me or to my
dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be
responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my
family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards ,
the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension ,
property , etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public
servants & guilty Constitutional
functionaries.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS
PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :
CPIO , o/o Chief Justice of India , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.
FEES PAID : IPO
16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only
DATE : 28.03.2015
……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)
RTI Appeals Not
Answered by SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA
- Crimes Cover-up
To ,
RTI Appellate Authority ,
O/O Chief Justice of
India ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.
APPEAL UNDER SEC 19
(3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
FULL NAME OF THE
APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE
APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE
& SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA
PIN – 570017.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and
freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They
will have sweet tongues and silly hearts.
They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political
squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir
Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our
criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police , public servants
& Judges. Some of the below mentioned
judges fall among the category of
churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI
, information was denied citing unavailability.
If at all information is not truly available , why didn’t the CPIO
TRANSFER rti application to
concerned departments of SCI , Ministry
of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess
SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis
they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR
can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that
person to share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately
arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation
to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to
hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes
even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police &
judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national security ,
integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges
& Police above Law ?
The action of
CPIO SCI amounts
to cover up of judges & their
crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also
CPIO & RTI First Appellate
Authority SCI have repeatedly committed
crimes by covering up
judges & their crimes.
Billions of indians are barely
sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling
hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to
them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw
pay & perks
amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us
still not do their constitutional duties
properly.
GIVE WHAT
ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN
AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED
IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
At the outset , we
express our whole hearted respects to
the honest few public servants in public
service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service don’t
deserve respect as individuals – as they
are parasites in our legal system. Still
we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.
All the following
articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below
forms part of this appeal. The term “JUDGE”mentioned throught includes all
public servants discharging judicial functions right from taluk
magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.
Indian Legal /
Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for sale. It is a
SHAME. The persons who raise their voice
seeking justice are silenced in many
ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents ,
Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer
will be responsible for it.
Hereby, we do once
again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India
& other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt
judges & police. Herewith , we
once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of
India , to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.
The public servants
& the government must be role models in law
abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a
thief steals , he can be caught ,
legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many
thieves go scot- free under his patronage.
even if a police , public servant
commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by
the aggrieved. just think , if a judge
himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of
RTI Act , constitutional rights &
human rights of public and obstructs the
public from performing their
constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty
, those in power , criminals in public service
to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is
happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion
& peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary
, public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
Kindly go through the following articles & provide
justice by giving complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering
the following questionnaire in an unambiguous
manner.
The constitution of
India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It
is the duty of every citizen to protect & uphold the dignity , honour of
our democratic institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect
the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct the discharge of these
duties by citizens of India. No legal
privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.
We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India
has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India
& by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals.
To express ourselves , we need information , data feed back , to ascertain whether we are getting
equal opportunity , whether we are
getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights & human rights. What
RTI Act has done is fixed time limit ,
responsibilities of public servants up to
certain extent. However the citizen's fundamental right & human
right to seek information extends far
beyond the scope of RTI Act.
Hereby , we seek complete
truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my
RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE
ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to register this appeal as a
PIL petition & to ascertain the
stand of apex court on various matters
raised in my RTI Application , in public interest & equitable
justice.
We salute honest few
in public service , Judiciary , police ,
parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted
respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY
REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
– WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I
AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST
RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR
TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE
AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE
SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM
IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police
,
Atrocities on Women
by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A – Z of
Manipulation of Indian
Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam
- Are
you DEAF DUMB
& BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind
,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs
& MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
Hereby , we do
request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable President of India
, PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha ,
PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka
CMO , Union Home Ministry GOI and DG & IG of Police of Government of
Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for
safeguarding national security ,
National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals
, criminals within the judiciary & police.
Main A :
1. What action you have taken against judges involved
in atrocities against women , casewise ? if not, why ?
2. What action
you have taken against judges involved in land scams , casewise ? if not , why
?
3. I have shown
with actual cases how manipulation /
fixing takes place , from complaint
filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the judges & police , above law
?
4. I have
numerous PILs , RTI appeals before
supreme court of india. But they were
not registered , not honoured , why ?
5. To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage
payment notice to supreme court of india & chief justice of india , till
date I have not received the reply , why ?
6. Is it not the
duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all Indian
citizens ?
7. Is it not the
failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life of a complainant ?
8. By negligence
of their duties , are not supreme court judges
aiding & abetting criminals ,
anti nationals & terrorists ?
9. While crores
of Indians are barely surviving on a
single piece meal a day , people dying due to starvation , supreme court judges are getting salary & perks
amounting to lakhs of rupees from the
same suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking judges ashamed ?
10. What action you
have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister rajiv
Gandhi assassination case ?
11. Why the supreme
court of india didn’t allow me to appear before it in the said case of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?
12. Why the supreme court of india didn’t protect my
life , my job oppurtunities , my newspaper
from the wrath of criminal nexus
?
13. When even cable TV
journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA accreditation ,
my web news papers , myself are not getting
PRESS accreditation since 9 years , why ?
14. Are the supreme
court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?
Main B :
You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI
requests , Numerous appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not
replied to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the criminals in
manipulating & destroying evidences.
Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only
amounts to denial of information , but
amounts to violation of our fundamental & human rights , cover-up of
crimes , aiding & abetting criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence
me in many ways. Is not these acts of your’s
a crime in itself ?
If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding
& abetting criminals , silencing a crusader
is just & legal. The same type of acts of crimes performed by other citizens will also be legal
?
Main C :
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all
constitutional institutions & to the
honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions ,
citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional
positions themselves. This is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,
constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.
1.
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from
vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in
parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting legal ?
2.
why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?
3.
just remember , the vulgar acts
of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature & how some MLAs
vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita
in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by
MPs & MLAs legal ? does not these
constitute contempt of the house by MPs & MLAs themselves ?
4.
all the people’s representatives from panchayath member to president of
India must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along with.since independence of
India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on people against the
wishes of people , formulating policies against the wishes of people. Are not
such projects , government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ?
5. is
the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits
submitted by electoral candidates ?
6.
how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits
? are all the violators prosecuted?
7.
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly
to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?
8.
what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving
false affidavits ?
9.
who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs ,
MLAs ?
10. the
agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even
during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural
products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during
recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive huge donations. Are all
these income legal ?
Main D :
1. we
do once again offer our conditional
services to the government of india , all state governments & supreme court
of india , in apprehending tax evaders ,
land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc.
whom the the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to
apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are not
ready to utilize our service ? are they
afraid of being caught ?
2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information /
records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause
of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants ,
courts legal ?
3.
why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police
complaints made by us ?
4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to
seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) ,
from union & state home ministries ?
5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the
supreme court of India & national human rights commission
has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high
profile case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings ,
TRPs ?
6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists ,
by their delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What action
has been taken against such anti-national elements in public service ?
7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist ,
Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice) to
Karnataka police , to national human rights commission to supreme court of India till date ? what
action taken with respect to each complaint ?
8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to following cases has resulted
in more crimes , destruction /
manipulation of evidences , records and
more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action
against criminals in following cases ?
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-…
DEALS IN COURTS
& POLICE STATIONS
READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of…
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of…
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME
COURT OF
INDIA -
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201
HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale
Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP – pushpa
kolasani on hunger strike in
anantapur district jail Andhra Pradesh
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap
9.
how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral
& illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each
case ?
10. what
action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public
examination in Andhra Pradesh ?
11. have
you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such judges of doubtful integrity
& honesty ?
12. is it
not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect the fundamental rights & human rights of
all Indian citizens ?
13. why
the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the
fundamental rights & human rights of
me & those mentioned in my
complaint ?
14. how
many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have
disproportionate wealth ?
15. Your
denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to suppression of evidence , hiding
crimes , what action against erring public servants ?
16. why
my previous RTI requests or part there
of was not transferred to appropriate authorities and information given to me
in a consolidated form ?
Main E :
Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder
people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd
degree torture on prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive
with criminals & backstabs our motherland , it’s national security ?
Q4. Don’t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in
the interest of public welfare , law & order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police ,
public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police
taking any action with respect to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by
constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting
money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees ,
judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis
, lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants
evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks.
Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is
arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this
double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his
fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don’t give full ,
truthfull information. Still , police / courts don’t take action against those
public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an “amicus curie”
before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime
minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my
news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by
physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases & by
attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police
& intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not
enquired even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these
injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives ,
livelihood of witnesses & all parties involved , both during case &
afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel
& increase in their family’s wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from
the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While
appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in
addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check
candidate’s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional
functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations
during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running
candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money
through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad
?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to
the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are
starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided terrorist
outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has
funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM
in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of
innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not
GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any
compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain
terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it
right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has
armed , trained & funded “salwa judum” to counter naxalites. Salwa judum
cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of
government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by
police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being
slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state ,
STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking
lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the
prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld
, anti national elements & attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim ,
other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not
charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld
& fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the
dangerous arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended for
terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he
is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to
farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their
farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is
this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants,
police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why
this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging
to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every
nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by
police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes
redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it’s products
come with IMEI number only & stated that the product in dispute sold by
tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their’s as it
doesn’t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don’t have any business
relationship with either tata indicom or it’s dealer. However the tata indicom
dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but
doesn’t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata
company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public.
These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers
best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police
are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the
decision to close a case ie to file “B” report , when after certain time limit
no leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who
purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be
closed with “B” report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against
the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the
argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison
or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv,
news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals ,
poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic
requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG &
IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint
was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even
copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date
?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity
privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not
burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their
constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn’t cover the individual
actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax
evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department
is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission & home
ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to
destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official
actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give
sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS ,
other people’s representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were
facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were
eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports
personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence
agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted
by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people’s representatives are
wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as
absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ?
did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign
origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other
country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual
citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of
foreign origin & while they are on foreign tour , from national security
perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of
india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union
minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi’s family
received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain
political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases
involving it’s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution
fails to prove it’s case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot
case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power
in Maharashtra , all the cases against it’s partymen were withdrawn. Are these
type of decisions by government just & legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to india’s national security
due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police /
military in various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these
prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of
police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by
courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder
charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths ,
fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police
officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations
, 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan’s
territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my “fundamental duty”
hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt
public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of
containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even their
family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government
provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the lines of
defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable
& his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food
allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police
personnel in public interaction , human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to
sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total
population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE ,
CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING
ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts
narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police
department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of
NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging
compromise meetings & subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or
else face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in
real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest
brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by
karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made
in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff
court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of
such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such
cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his
superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted
for their wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before
law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by
accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of
some judges including the wealth in the name of judge’s family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth
statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by
the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for
making unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc
against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests
like “poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc” , in the interest of
justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are
ineligible to be the members of “Karnataka state government judicial department
house building co-operative society”. Then how come , many judges including
supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society & allotted
prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said
society at said society’s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the
ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a
site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India ,
central government or state government or government agency is one of the
parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn ,
favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the
government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody
suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court
which is handling that tortured person’s case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective
judges & the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges
of attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has
called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public
vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me
the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for
the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for
the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit
ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesn’t get adequate food , medical care
while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge
dealing that person’s case responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to
prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under
judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence
periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge
finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about the
excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal ,
excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases
?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years &
finally the judge finds them as innocents & acquits them of the charges.
What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the
judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ?
what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official
actions & the actions arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official
actions as judges & their personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the
privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of
advocates from bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of
retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions
, etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes –
scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &
women are their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ?
kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to
enforce the accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present
state of affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic
drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer’s expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of
alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie
Karnataka high court judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost
resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government
employees are not getting proper health care from government at government
hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health care to judges ,
constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad ,
all at tax payer’s expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health
check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties & mental balance in
the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for
accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not
considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing
“amicus curie” in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me
as an “amicus curie” in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination case , was not
considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating
suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media
daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action
in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of
taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not
needy person’s rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases
responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case & afterwards
?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on
prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence
right ? what action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government
prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation
intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high & mighty
people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of
police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing
authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against rich
& mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights
activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to
quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers ,
revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors
over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor ,
e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme
court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court
ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the
honourable supreme court of India , through government of india’s on-line
grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 ,
DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 ,
DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 ,
DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159
, DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877
, DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174
, DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 ,
DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 ,
DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of
India , copies of which are available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges
committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money ,
untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial
orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime
real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours
along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges
themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens
of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of
India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative
actions to policemen’s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen
& their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration
depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police
to national security is on par with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their
subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with
singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect
the health, lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who
wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his
confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity ,
pension to such guilty police personnel & pay it as compensation to victims
of police failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen
of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option
, to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other
british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in
India & other british colonies. After india’s independence what happened to
those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue
with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government
continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji
subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or
it’s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED
ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide
information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to
your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me
information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others ,
in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete
truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got
copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will
he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi
high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution
advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich
criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &
prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are
ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in
practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she
wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government
of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon
confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet
meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional
offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen
guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?
Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &
parliamentarians by the constitution of India?
a) Inside the House b) Outside the House
Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional
functionaries, like
a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India
c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC
e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.
Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above
mentioned constitutional functionaries ?
a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.
b) Cover both their official & personal actions.
Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?
Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?
Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the
citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the
constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?
Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be
equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior
court and court of records ?
Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature,
the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of
commons and House of Lords in England ?
Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of
privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by
raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?
Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to
circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by
peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount to infringement of
Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.
Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important
than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in
importance to it ?
Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes,
anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal
veil of official’s secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go
unpunished by his legal immunity privileges
Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court
& Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing
to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges
would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?
Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians
get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer’s money, they get
their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote
of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian
is above or more valid in a democracy ?
Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are
indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get
their pay, perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the
vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a
seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?
Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament,
who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament
acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation
to cover the field (vacuum) ?
Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim
to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the
legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?
Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a
judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?
Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo
moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?
Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices
affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation” ? In some cases, the
Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the
case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.
Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. &
giving free legal aid ?
Q164. Communication – free flow of information is the
lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring
the Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief
justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all
internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just
& legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description of charges
against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than
others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against
guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act
inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief
justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme
court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary
inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human
being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this
vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out
that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious
dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in
exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous
judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be
drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his
senses & brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed
/ said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police
officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many
suspects & produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before
magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk
during that time. Does the senses of drunken police & judges work properly
to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &
to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken
state legal ?
Q 172 . What action
has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police
officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police
officials , district magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who
fully aided the criminals – Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail & flee the country without court’s
permission ?
Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said
guilty with respect to their contempt of court
& for aiding a criminal to escape ?
Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice
of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried
? what action has been taken against the
CJI who became an official of the trust belonging to the criminal ?
Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public
servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas
tragedy ?
Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour
department & pollution control board officials who have failed in their
duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?
Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet
ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal
although they don’t have right to do so ?
Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge
of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public
prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all
along and didn’t press for the
extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for
producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?
Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police ,
government officials & people’s representatives who became part of
Operation Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders
of thousands & maiming of lakhs of
hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?
Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt
ministers , corrupt labour / pollution
control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why
police are not registering my
complaint against CJI & other VVIPS ,Even after years ?
Q 183 don’t the
police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal jurisdiction
to register the case against these VVIPs ? or just
because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they
are not booked by police? If the said
police don’t have legal
jurisdiction to book these VVIPs , they
should have transferred the
complaint to those authorities who have jurisdiction
& authority to book & prosecute these
VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of crimes & criminals ? are not
these cover ups itself is a crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must
be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals for justice
concerning public welfare , national security sent
through post , e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted as
Public interest litigation , why ?
does not these acts of Supreme
court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together
with the jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate responsible
to protect the fundamental & human rights of people ?
why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the fundamental &
human rights of people including mine ? For all the previous
injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district
magistrate & jurisdictional police
are together responsible , if
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the
quartet – Honourable Chief Justice of
India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police
Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar
police station , mysore will be responsible .
These corrupt
parasites will feel , understand
the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty
– In whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is
equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths
nothing less nothing more.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE
PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION
OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:
CPIO , SUPREME COURT
OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.
FEES PAID : IPO 16G
733465 for rupees TWENTY
only
DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE ,
INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)
DECLARATION
Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.
Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE
, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA
Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e – Voice For Justice
Periodicity : WEEKLY
Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB
Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted
any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other
organizations / individuals .
Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way
of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.
Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.
Nationality : INDIAN
Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor ,
S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS
Medical College , Mysore (
Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or
Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to
JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.
Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e
– clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye
Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands
of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore
WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.
Home page :
http://evoiceforjustice.dalitonline.in/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
http://paper.li/f-1368369249 ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,
UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479
Cell : 91 8970318202
It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard
the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since
25 years I am appealing
to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national
security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights
, human rights are repeatedly violated
but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically
, after these appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts
on my life were made , physically
assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed , press
accreditation denied , received
threatening calls , blank calls, even to
date rough elements follow us , rough
elements scout near home at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties between rough
elements & SCI Judges ?
Public Interest Litigation is an appeal for justice
to the courts , to redress the
injustices meted out to the public. Individual cases of injustices pertaining to an individual are not covered
under PIL, however an individual an
activist who is fighting for public causes suffering
injustices as a result of his struggle
,caused by powers that be to silence him
can club his individual case
under the public causes (PIL ) he
is appealing.
Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity are being selected to public posts , end
result is present day india. In the
following web sites I have shown few
actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of
justice common man gets.
Traitors in Indian
Judiciary & Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police
Crimes by Khaki
https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki ,
Police show full bravery , courage , use full might of law while acting against
innocents , commoners. Even takes suo
motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits
while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest /
search , seizure without warrant ,
arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich
crooks , their own corrupt colleagues no
suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get
anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure
without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?
Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book
while judging cases of commoners , take
suo motto action where as cases involving rich crooks comes before them
inspite of repeated PILs they don’t consider it , let alone take suo motto
action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting
the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given
above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly
called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the
losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc
must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel
repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station
for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks ,
criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are
high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by
police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my
family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss
of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police
together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for
it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against
me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
Powers that be ,
higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of
the cases police don’t have jurisdiction over it. It
sends a subtle message by police
force to the complainant
to keep silent . In the remaining cases
which are under their jurisdiction police don’t act against higher ups , high &
mighty. In such cases police lack
practical powers , their hands are tied although they are
honest. As a end result ,
police have repeatedly called me to police station number of
times ( have never called
guilty influential persons even
once) took statement
from me and closed the files.
Hereby , I do make it clear
the statements made by me in my
original petitions , PILs , news papers
, etc while I was in a free & fair atmosphere are
TRUE , over rides , prevails over
all the statements made by me before police
earlier and which will be made by
me in future before police.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our
fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves ,
If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members
– In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue
& police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government
of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my
family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards ,
the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension ,
property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &
Constitutional functionaries.
date :
01.04.2017…………………………..Your’s sincerely,
place : India……………………………………Nagaraja.M.R.
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ #
LIG-2 No
761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,
OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSURU –
570017 KARNATAKA INDIA
Cell : 91 8970318202
Home page :
http://evoiceforjustice.dalitonline.in/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/
,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice
/ , http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
http://paper.li/f-1368369249 ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of
Amnesty International
1 comment:
Are you tired of seeking loans and Mortgages,have you been turned down constantly By your banks and other financial institutions,We offer any form of loan to individuals and corporate bodies at low interest rate.If you are interested in taking a loan,feel free to contact us today,we promise to offer you the best services ever.Just give us a try,because a trial will convince you.What are your Financial needs?Do you need a business loan?Do you need a personal loan?Do you want to buy a car?Do you want to refinance?Do you need a mortgage loan?Do you need a huge capital to start off your business proposal or expansion? Have you lost hope and you think there is no way out, and your financial burdens still persists? Contact us (gaincreditloan1@gmail.com )
Your Name:...............
Your Country:...............
Your Occupation:...............
Loan Amount Needed:...............
Loan Duration...............
Monthly Income:...............
Your Telephone Number:.....................
Business Plan/Use Of Your Loan:...............
Contact Us At : gaincreditloan1@gmail.com
Website: http://gaincreditln.com/wb/
Phone number :+44-75967-81743 (Whats app)
Post a Comment