S.O.S e - Voice For Justice - e-news
weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor:
Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.08..Issue.18........05/05/2012
“There is a higher court than the court of
justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”
- Mahatma Gandhi
- Mahatma Gandhi
Bofors case: BJP insists on judicial
commission
Bofors on Thursday returned to rock Parliament after 25 years.
The opposition, mainly the BJP, had a field day in both houses criticising the Congress and demanding a judicial inquiry into the Bofors scam. Both the BJP and the Left said the Bofors chapter was not closed and culprits should be brought to book.
The opposition, mainly the BJP, had a field day in both houses criticising the Congress and demanding a judicial inquiry into the Bofors scam. Both the BJP and the Left said the Bofors chapter was not closed and culprits should be brought to book.
Not to be left behind, the Congress retaliated by threatening a
judicial inquiry into the Tehelka controversy that had led to the ouster of
Bangaru Laxman as the BJP chief.
“There should be a limit to everything. The BJP found it difficult
to come to terms with its 2004 defeat, and after its failure in 2009, it is
finding it increasingly difficult to live with the UPA-II government,” Janardan
Dwivedi, AICC general secretary and Congress chief spokesperson, said. “So,
instead of accepting the final verdict of our Supreme Court, it wants to bank
on the words of a retired police officer from an alien land.”
Dwivedi said no
purpose would be served by digging up old graves. “No court has found any
evidence against Rajiv Gandhi… what purpose will it serve to set up another
judicial commission?”
When some Congress leaders wanted to know why the BJP had failed to get Quattrocchi extradited from Malaysia, Jaswant Singh (BJP) admitted to the party’s failure but said “it was time to set things right”.
When some Congress leaders wanted to know why the BJP had failed to get Quattrocchi extradited from Malaysia, Jaswant Singh (BJP) admitted to the party’s failure but said “it was time to set things right”.
Raising the
matter in the Lok Sabha, Singh said: “Bofors ki aandhi thami nahin… In matters of corruption, there is no
closure.” He said he was among the few who had said there was no problem with
Bofors. “But the mode of procurement and payments was flawed,” he said.
After repeated interruptions from Pawan Bansal, parliamentary
affairs minister, Singh asked: “Why did the government withdraw the red corner
notice against Quattrocchi? Why was Amitabh Bachchan’s name dragged into the
controversy? Why didn’t the CBI team meet Swedish authorities and identify
those who had aided Quattrocchi’s escape from Delhi?”
Congress leaders, however, ruled out a new investigation because
the Supreme Court had closed the matter. The treasury benches clamoured for an
apology from the BJP and other parties for accusing former prime minister Rajiv
Gandhi of being involved in the scam.
Sten Lindstrom, the former chief of the Sweden police who had
blown the whistle on the Bofors scam, said in an interview on Tuesday that
there was no evidence to show that Gandhi had received any bribe. “But he
watched the massive cover-up in India and Sweden and did nothing,” Lindstrom
said.
Arun Jaitley, leader of opposition in the Rajya Sabha, said the
scam should be investigated to strengthen probity in public life. He said the
Bofors case highlighted the need for transparency in defence procurement.
Congress spokesperson Dwivedi reminded Jaitley that the Delhi high
court had given its judgement on Bofors when Jaitley was the law minister in
the NDA government.
Mani Shankar Aiyar (Congress) said: “The reason why we could not
unearth the truth is because the pursuit of truth began with a series of
untruths.”
What the Bofors scandal is all about
Aiming to replace the
old field guns and artillery in the hands of the Army, the Indian government in
the mid 1980s decided to go ahead with the induction of bigger calibre 155 mm
howitzers. The Haubits FH-77 gun manufactured by AB Bofors of Sweden, a company
which was once owned by Alfred Nobel, was selected. A deal was signed on March
24, 1986, between New Delhi and the Swedish metals and armaments major, which
said AB Bofors would supply the Indian Army with 410 155-mm howitzers. An
option to license-produce 1000 more guns was also included in the deal.The
amount was a significant $285 million (about Rs 1500 crore) for a
pre-liberalisation India.
The first whiff about
the scandal came on April 16, 1987 when a Swedish Radio broadcast claimed that
AB Bofors had paid kickbacks to key Indian policy makers and top defence
officials to secure the deal. News about this broadcast was carried in the
Indian media and the Rajiv Gandhi government issued a prompt denial.
Sitting in her Geneva
office, The Hindu's correspondent Chitra Subramaniam was in an advanced stage
of pregnancy when she heard about the broadcast and the newspaper's then Editor
N Ram asked her to follow it up. What followed thereafter remains unrivalled in
the annals of Indian investigative journalism.
As Chitra started
calling up the right people and asked them the right questions, hundreds and
hundreds of damning documents piled up on her desk. The people of India were
shocked to know that over Rs 64 crore was indeed paid to some very powerful
people. At the centre of it all cropped up the name of Ottavio Quattrocchi, an
Italian businessman who represented the Italian petrochemicals firm
Snamprogetti and had reportedly rose to become a powerful broker between New
Delhi and international businesses owing to his reported proximity to the
Gandhi family.
Under immense pressure
and as a face-saver, a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) was set up to probe
the allegations on August 6, 1987. It submitted its report two years later.
The Bofors kickbacks
became the key poll issue in the November parliamentary polls in 1989. The
Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress was voted out of power and on December 26 of the same
year, Prime Minister VP Singh's government barred AB Bofors from entering into
any further defence contract with the Government of India. Incidentally VP
Singh was the defence minister when the deal was signed.
On January 22, 1990, the
CBI registered the first formal complaint in the case. However, Rajiv Gandhi
was assassinated by LTTE suicide bombers on May 21, 1991. This led to a general
slackening of the investigative process which many observers say allowed
Quattrocchi to leave India in the end of July, 1993.
After years of legal
procedures and constant wrangling, on January 21, 1997, the Swiss authorities
gave the Government of India secret documents which allegedly ran into over 500
pages. Barely a week later, a special investifative team was set up by the CBI
to investigate the case. Later in the same year, the CBI filed formal charges
against Rajiv Gandhi, Ottavio Quattrocchi, AB Bofors and its former chief
Martin Ardbo, defence secretary SK Bhatnagar and AB Bofors agent Win Chadha.
Letters were sent out to Malaysia and UAE seeking the arrest of Quattrocchi.
In the subsequent years,
the name of the UK-based Hinduja brothers cropped up but in 2000, the Hindujas
issued a statement saying the funds received by them from AB Bofors had nothing
to do with the howitzer order.
Towards the end of 2000,
the Malaysian authorities arrested Quattrocchi. But he secured bail but was
asked to stay in the country.
In 2001, two of the
accused, former defence secretary Bhatnagar and Win Chadha passed away. On
February 4, 2004, Delhi High Court exonerated Rajiv Gandhi in the case and in
2005, the same court cleared the Hindujas of involvement.
The case lost steam
thereafter though on February 6, 2007, Quattrocchi was detained in Argentina on
an Interpol lookout notice. But the Indian Governbment seeking his extradition
did not back up the extradition request with details of a key court order which
was turned down by the Argentinian Supreme Court. Many observers feel that this
was deliberately done.
On September 29, 2009,
the Government of India informed Supreme Court about its decision to withdraw
the case against Quattrocchi as he could not be extradited. Though in the
beginning of 2011, an Income Tax tribunal ruled that a commission of over Rs 40
crore in violation of Indian laws was indeed paid to Quattrochi and Chadha in
the gun deal. But on March 4, 2011, a Delhi court, realising the futility of
the exercise, allowed the CBI to drop all charges against Quattrochhi and to
close the case.
The Bofors case once
again garnered top news spots on April 24, 2012 when Swedish police chief Sten
Lindstrom revealed that he was the Deep Throat in the Bofors case and the key
source that Chitra Subramaniam turned to. He added that the Swedish Police had
no evidence of Rajiv Gandhi or Amitabh Bachchan receiving kickbacks in the
Bofors scam.
Bofors: How Rajiv Gandhi did everything to scuttle the probe
Congress spokespersons
believe that trying to bring the Bofors payoff scandal back to life is like
flogging a dead horse. But they have been quick to latch on to retired Swedish
police chief Sten Lindstrom’s recent statement(read here) that
there was no evidence to directly link Rajiv Gandhi to the payoffs.
But the main point that was missed is that
Rajiv Gandhi moved heaven and earth to scuttle the investigations, and various
Indian governments – even opposition-led ones like the NDA – failed to put in
real efforts to get to the names, which would ultimately have led to Ottavio
Quattrocchi, close friend of Sonia and Rajiv Gandhi. Thus the question is not
whether Rajiv received any bribe for the Bofors deal, but why did he and his
close ring of officials go out of the way to protect Quattrocchi – unless it was
to protect the linkage to him and Sonia.
Firstpost sifted through some of the old papers relating to the
Bofors case in the late 1980s, and what Rajiv Gandhi’s role was in scuttling
efforts to get to the bottom of the scandal. Here’s what we found (with some
background included).
The Bofors deal was struck in 1986 and months
later Swedish Radio reported that Bofors had paid commissions to middlemen for
securing the Rs 1,600 crore deal in contravention of Indian laws. But for three
years, the Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress government did not let the Central Bureau
of Investigation (CBI) register an FIR in the case. The FIR happened only on 22
January 1990, when VP Singh ousted Rajiv Gandhi in the 1989 election.
The CBI’s old Bofors files bear out the
statements of Sten Lindstrom. They did not find a payoff link to Rajiv Gandhi,
but there is no doubt he held up the investigations for fairly obvious reasons:
his family’s proximity with Ottavio Quattrocchi, who was a proven recipient of
illegal money.
have led
to Quattrocchi. Reuters
The Bofors FIR begins with a note: “Subsequent
to the Bofors contract, when allegations of bribery were repeatedly made by the
media and in Parliament from April 1987 onwards, only ineffective and
half-hearted steps were taken and no serious or purposeful effort was made by
the concerned public servants of the government of India to get the true facts.
On the other hand, whenever any occasion arose or specific suggestions were
made of steps that could be taken to find out the truth, efforts were
successfully made, as set out hereafter, to foil all attempts at it and to
suppress the same.’’
Although the CBI’s own role appears shady
during stints of Congress-led governments, it did not deter the organisation
from documenting how the investigations were systematically delayed over the
years. And Rajiv Gandhi’s role is quite evident in the CBI files.
In June 1987, when the entire country was
concerned about the Bofors scandal, the then Minister of State for Defence Arun
Singh prepared a note and got ratified it by the then Defence Minister KC Pant.
The note was categorical that the Indian government should threaten to snap
diplomatic ties with Sweden and cancel the Bofors gun deal if Bofors would not
give names of middlemen.
“In my view we must be prepared to go to this
extent of cancellation because our very credibility as a government is at stake
and, what is worse, the credibility of the entire process of defence
acquisitions is also at stake,’’ Arun Singh said in his ‘draft’ letter.
When the letter was sent to Rajiv Gandhi for
final approval, he wrote back on 15 June 1987: “It is unfortunate that MOS/AS
has put his personal prestige above the security of the nation before even
evaluating all aspects. I appreciate his feelings as he had been dealing with
defence almost completely on his own with my full support but that is not
adequate reason to be ready to compromise the security of the nation.
“Has he evaluated the actual position
vis-a-vis security? Has he evaluated the financial loss of a cancellation? Has
he evaluated the degree of breach of contract by Bofors, if any? Has he
evaluated the consequences for all future defence purchases if we cancel a
contract unilaterally? Has he evaluated how rival manufacturers will behave in
the future? Has he evaluated how GOI prestige will plummet if we unilaterally
cancel a contract that has not been violated?
“To the best of my belief the Swedish Audit
report upholds GOI position and does not contradict it. What we need to do is
to get to the roots and find out what precisely has been happening and who all
are involved. Knee-jerk reactions and stomach cramps will not serve any
purpose. RRM (Arun Singh) has run the ministry fairly well but there is no
reason to panic, specially if one’s conscience is clear.”
Clearly, Rajiv Gandhi played the national security card to
stymie the probe. This note of Rajiv Gandhi set the tone for further
investigations into Bofors. The first result was Arun Singh’s resignation three
days later.
However, the efforts to get
to the truth did not stop here. Even as Rajiv Gandhi was berating Arun Singh
for not considering security interests while threatening Bofors with
cancellation, the army saw no concerns with Arun Singh’s strategy.
CBI files show that the then
Indian Army chief, General K Sundarji, wrote a note to then Defence Secretary
SK Bhatnagar: “If India threatened to cancel the contract with Bofors, there
was a 99.9 percent chance that Bofors would ‘cough up’ the information about
the persons who had received the money and that in the event of actual
cancellation of the contract, the delay caused in acquiring an alternate gun
could be borne by India.”
In an interview to India Today,
General Sundarji also disclosed that he had conveyed the same view to Gopi
Arora, then Special Secretary in the Prime Minister’s Office.
General Sundarji’s note,
however, was found awkward by the Rajiv Gandhi administration. And SK Bhatnagar
did ask him to modify the note. When he refused to do so, Bhatnagar returned
his note. “I recommended that in the interest of vindicating National Honour we
apply full pressure on Bofors to part with the information needed for legal
action against the culprits and accept the risk that this might, in the worst
case, lead to a cancellation of the contract,’’ General Sundarji stated in the
interview (which the CBI has quoted during the Bofors investigations).
So here was a situation when
all the top brass of the Indian government were on the same page in June 1987.
The country’s army chief asserted that cancellation of the Bofors deal would
not affect security. The Attorney General for India too had given advice to the
Ministry of Defence that the Bofors contract could be cancelled. Arun Singh and
KC Pant had already spoken in favour of threatening Bofors with cancellation
for getting names of the middlemen. Even SK Bhatnagar was for serving the
‘cancellation’ threat.
In his recent interview,
Lindstrom notes that even without these threats, but fearing cancellation,
Bofors actually “sent its top executives to India with the one-point task of
giving out the names. Nobody of any consequence received them.”
How could this have happened
without pressure from the highest in the land?
The pressure was evident
from the fact that a month later, in July 1987, Bhatnagar did a volte face and
expressed a totally different view opposing the threat of cancellation of the
Bofors contract. “There are reasons to believe that SK Bhatnagar did so either
on his own or was prevailed upon to do so,” the CBI FIR says.
Not only this. On 16
September 1987, the CBI files say, Swedish Chief Prosecutor Lars Ringberg made
a request to India, through Interpol, for assistance in his enquiries from the
government of India. “Are the Indian investigation authorities interested in
exchange of information with the Swedish preliminary leaders?” asked Ringberg’s
letter.
“Apart from referring the
message of Lars Ringberg to JPC (Joint Parliamentary Committee in India), no
further action was taken on the message,’’ the CBI files say. In fact, Ringberg
had to withdraw the inquiry inconclusively because of non-assistance of the
Indian government.
“A judicial inquiry similar
to our preliminary inquiry concerning possible bribery offences has not been
commenced in India. Thus, neither written nor oral evidence has been obtained
through the inquiry undertaken with regard to whom payments were made and the
reasons for them. In view of this, and since it cannot be expected that
information of decisive importance for the matter of prosecution could be
obtained by continuing the inquiry, the preliminary inquiry is withdrawn,’’
remarked Ringberg in his statement recorded on 28 January 1988.
In 1989, Rajiv Gandhi was
ousted and VP Singh replaced him. In May 1991, Rajiv Gandhi was killed in a
terrorist attack in Chennai. The Bofors case literally crawled despite
conclusive evidence of Quattrocchi receiving illegal money as middleman even
after Rajiv Gandhi’s death.
On 20 October 1993, the CBI,
for the first time, put up a proposal for issuing a letter rogatory to the
Liechtenstein government for help in the Bofors probe, since the government was
willing to help. But Prime Minister Narasimha Rao did not agree to the CBI’s
request.
When Joginder Singh joined
as CBI Director in 1996, only one witness, that is a retired under-secretary in
the defence ministry, had been examined three times. “It was a hot case and
nobody was willing to touch it, much less investigate it. Even I was advised
that it would be in my interest not to wake the sleeping giants,” Joginder
Singh said.
Despite a Bofors
charge-sheet naming Rajiv Gandhi and dropping charges against him at the same
time because he was dead, the truth has not come out so far. Despite recording
consistent delays by the Rajiv Gandhi-led administration (in which Gopi Arora,
Special Secretary to Rajiv Gandhi, and Sarla Grewal, Principal Secretary to
Rajiv Gandhi, were prominently mentioned) in the Bofors probe, the CBI rather
chose to close the case.
Editorial
: Legal prosecution of cruel & inhuman STF police personnel
- An appeal to H.E.HONOURABLE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA
- An appeal to H.E.HONOURABLE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA
During “catch forest brigand
veerappan operation” , Special Task Force
police personnel , illegally arrested , detained , tortured &
murdered innocent tribal people of both tamil nadu & Karnataka states.
NHRC has clearly noted the crimes of STF personnel & ordered both
Karnataka & tamil nadu governments to pay compensation to victims of
police atrocities. However still some of these victims are not yet
paid compensation by these governments , why ? also , the government
instead of legally prosecuting guilty police officers on murder
charges , has given awards & promotion to guilty inhuman police
officers. Is the government sending a message that 3rd degree torture
& murders in lock-up / fake encounters is acceptable & legal ? is it
equitable justice ? is there one set of law for police & another for
common people ?
police personnel , illegally arrested , detained , tortured &
murdered innocent tribal people of both tamil nadu & Karnataka states.
NHRC has clearly noted the crimes of STF personnel & ordered both
Karnataka & tamil nadu governments to pay compensation to victims of
police atrocities. However still some of these victims are not yet
paid compensation by these governments , why ? also , the government
instead of legally prosecuting guilty police officers on murder
charges , has given awards & promotion to guilty inhuman police
officers. Is the government sending a message that 3rd degree torture
& murders in lock-up / fake encounters is acceptable & legal ? is it
equitable justice ? is there one set of law for police & another for
common people ?
Hereby , we do once again
request your kindself , to dismiss guilty
police officials from police service , to withhold their pension
benefits , to legally prosecute them on charges of murders of
innocent tribal people & on charges of attempt to murder innocent
tribal people by 3rd degree torture methods. Hereby , we also request
you to make public JUSTICE A.J. SADA SHIVA COMMISSION’s findings
about atrocities by STF personnel.
police officials from police service , to withhold their pension
benefits , to legally prosecute them on charges of murders of
innocent tribal people & on charges of attempt to murder innocent
tribal people by 3rd degree torture methods. Hereby , we also request
you to make public JUSTICE A.J. SADA SHIVA COMMISSION’s findings
about atrocities by STF personnel.
To order the prison
authorities to subject the four convicts, accomplices of Veerappan to Narco
analysis & Bran mapping tests in a fair manner with unbiased questionnaire.
So that truth will come out about Ex-Minister Nagappa's Murder
case, Amount of Ransoms paid during all kidnap episodes including Movie star Raj Kumar's kidnap episode. Truth will come out about the Minister M.L.As. M.Ps. Police & Forest Officials who have stacked away riches by helping him. Truth will come about Granite quarry owners who helped him. Truth will come out about traders, merchants who traded in goods , sandal wood , Ivory supplied by forest brigand Veerappan.
To order the Govt of Karnataka , to make public the Justice A J
Sadashiva's commission's final report & complete proceedings . Then the truth will come out, how the STF personnel, police tortured tribal people at a place called WORK SHOP IN M M HILLS how they gang raped tribal women repeatedly for days together, how they burnt their breasts, how they pushed sticks smeared with chilli sambar powder into their anus. How the police tied men folk upside down from the ceiling . How many died, unable to bear the shame & torture ? Are not these brutal inhuman STF police personnel fit to be hanged till death, along with four accomplices of Veerappan ?
To order the National Human Rights Commission to make public the findings of its independent enquiry conducted about the police torture on tribal people. Violations of human rights of tribal people in the forest brigand veerappan's Territory i.e. M M Hills.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Your’s Sincerely,
Nagaraja.M.R.
Veerappan's wife seeks CBI probe into STF atrocities
The wife of slain forest
brigand Veerappan, V Muthulakshmi, has sought a detailed CBI probe into alleged
atrocities committed on tribals and villagers in MM Hills by personnel of the
Special Task Force constituted to nab her husband in the 1990s.
Muthulakshmi welcomed the
recent Karnataka high court order striking down Shankar M Bidari's appointment
as DG&IG. "But there is still need for a CBI probe into STF
atrocities; he was a commandant of that force," she said on Friday.
She alleged Bidari and his
team had tortured women, who had no connection with Veerappan, including her.
"He administered electric shocks to parts of my body which I cannot even
explain. Many women took their lives, orphaning their
children," she said.
Muthulakshmi alleged that the
film being made on her husband's life - 'Attahasa' (in Kannada) and
'Vamayudham' (Tamil version) - by filmmaker MR Ramesh, is full of lies. She has
approached Madras high court seeking a stay on its making. "The film
infringes on my right to privacy," she added.
'He was a good man'
"Avar Nallavar (He was a
nice man)," Muthulakshmi said about her husband, brigand Veerappan, eight
years after he was killed in police action.
"It is politicians and
police who spoiled him. I know those netas but do not want to take their
names," she told TOI. "I am not saying he was faultless. He had shot
a few elephants for ivory and axed some sandalwood trees. But he also planted
sandalwood saplings, saying the forest shouldn't be emptied," she said.
Shankar Bidari worse than Saddam Hussain, Gaddafi: HC
In a scathing
verdict, Karnataka High Court today struck down appointment of Shankar Bidari
as state DGP and IG, describing him as "worse than Saddam Hussain or
Muammar Gaddafi" for alleged atrocities committed by the STF led by him
during the hunt to nab forest brigand Veerappan.
Dismissing as "without
merit and substance", petitions by the government and Bidari, challenging
the CAT order, the division bench headed by Justice N Kumar held his
empanelment by UPSC and consequent appointment as "void and illegal."
Upholding the verdict of
Central Administrative Tribunal the court said "in the facts of the case,
we cannot find any infirmity in the said decision. It is just".
It struck down Bidari's
contentions "absolving himself of the responsibility" of atrocities
by stating he was only Deputy Commander of the Joint Task Force of Karnataka
and Tamil Nadu to nab Veerappan and not "omnipresent and omnipotent like
Saddam Hussain or Muammar Gaddafi."
"Though he was not one of
them, if what the two women (tribals) have said in their affidavit is true, he
is worse than them" (Saddam Hussain and Muamar Gadaffi),the court said in
its acerbic observations.
The court directed the
government should relieve Bidari forthwith and appoint A R Infant in his place.
"Otherwise they are answerable to the public of the state".
The court dismissed the memo
filed by the government seeking a one week stay of the order. It observed
"if the state government has any respect for the rule of law, womanhood,
human rights, concern for the downtrodden, tribals, and socially backward
communities of the state, they should relieve the third respondent (Bidari)
forthwith and appoint the applicant (A R Infant) in that place."
On March 16, CAT had set aside
Bidari's appointment as DGP and IG and ruled that Infant should be appointed ad
hoc police chief till the government decides on the new appointment.
CAT said government should
prepare a fresh list of senior IPS officers and send it to UPSC, which would
suggest three names for the top post.
On the court verdict, Infant
told PTI "I am lucky that my case was tried by judges with great
conviction, both at CAT and High Court. I admire their courage of
conviction".
Observing that Chief Minister
should have used his discretion while exercising his absolute power in
selecting Bidari for the post, the court stated "......but such
discretionary power must be exercised with great caution.....the Chief Minister
before exercising his power did not see the police records".
Quoting extracts from the
National Human Rights Commission report, which was not placed before the Union
Public Service Commission before empanelment as it was not considered
"relevant", the court stated that NHRC concluded that one woman was a
victim of rape and repeated torture, three women were subjected electric
currents through different parts of their body, seven subjected to illegal
detention and assault, three suffered permanent disability, 11 stripped naked
and given electric shocks, 12 unlawfully detained, one was taken into custody
but never returned and 60 were killed in encounters out of 36 were killed in
"false encounters".
Referring to the affidavits
filed by tribal women Erammal and Nagi before an NGO which was produced before
the court and indicted Bidari, the court stated "Erammal was taken to
Dimbam police camp, beaten with a lathi as a result of which she lost sight in
her right eye, She was then taken Mahadeshwara camp where she was stripped
naked, beaten and given electric shocks in different parts of her body in front
of Bidari".
The court then cited the
instance of Nagi who taken to the M M Hills camp, was blindfolded and
interrogated by Bidari who passed currents through different parts of her body
and then she was gang raped.
The court observed that though
the then governments accepted the recommendations of the NHRC accorded
compensation to the victims and then DG and IG (Achutha Rao) promised to
initiate action against the perpetrators, no action was initiated. Probably
they (the then CMs) lacked the "political will and courage" to direct
action against these acts.
Taking a swipe at the present
day politics, the court observed "people who are in opposition party
preach values, criticise the acts of the ruling party. Gullible public believe
them and they are voted to power, but when they come to power they realise it
is very difficult to practice what they preach and when they are seated in
super power (ruling party) all these values evaporate. They succumb to
corruption. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely".
Therefore it is immaterial,
the court observed which party comes to power, what ideology they believe in,
what principles they preach. Once they come to power, they become the ruling party.
This is the democracy which is in practice.
It appears that the present
day state government and Bidari after occupying the present position seems to
have forgotten was was said 15 years back, the court observed. "By
characterising this report as "one without jurisdiction, giving the
impression that it was not a document of any importance.....government of the
day and Bidari are afraid of truth....we are convinced that the report of the
Sadashiv Panel, NHRC was deliberately kept back", the court obseved.
There is no disputing the
fact, the court stated, that the record of Bidari during his tenure in STF of
Karnataka and his bio-data which was prepared by himself wherein he stated the
exemplary service that he rendered that won him the gallantry award and a cash
prize of Rs 1.68 crore, was placed before the UPSC. "This is the positive
side of the story that was placed before the UPSC".
What is clear from the report,
the court observed is there were allegations against STF personnel of Karnataka
that they committed atrocities on innocent villagers of 48 villages, committed
murder, false encounters, rape and torture and 20 written complaints were filed
before the NHRC.
On Bidari's contention that he
was not personally indicted by NHRC, the court observed that the NHRC has
categorically stated that it has not indicted any one as it has been unable to
identify the perpetrators of the acts. "This only shows the fairness and
application of judicial mind".
The court observed "from
the report, it is clear that atrocities were committed by police on the
instructions of R3 and while the state and the police assured of action against
the culprits, no action has been till date.
What is to be considered, the
court observed is whether such a person who has "no concern for women, her
rights, her safety and that of the poor tribals, downtrodden and socially
backward classes. A person with such a bent of mind can head the state police
force to maintain law and order, whether their (public) interests are safe in
such hands.
These are the facts which UPSC
and the state Chief Minister should have considered while exercising the power
conferred on him and it is these factual findings of the Sadashiva panel and
the NHRC which the government should have placed before the UPSC. "In the
absence of such material, the assessment by the UPSC and state government is
vitiated", the court said.
Reflecting on the mindset of
Bidari, who wants to absolve himself from the responsibility stating that he
was only acting under the supervision and control of Walter Davaram, the
commander of the STF, the court observed "even after 15 years, there is no
remorse, he is not prepared to accept the responsibility........whatever may
the provocation, we cannot tolerate for a second rape...... as a means of
investigation by the police".
Finally, in an message to the
Chief Minister, the court stated "it is not a legal issue but a moral
issue. As a head of the state, what are the various concerns, what is the
message he is sending has to be kept in mind. Even now it is not too late to
keep the interests of the public in mind and assure that previous dispensation
would not be repeated and appropriate action taken".
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
STATEMENT
AI Index: ASA 20/002/2008
(Public)
Date: 18 January 2008
(Public)
Date: 18 January 2008
India: Many adivasi victims
of Special Task Force (STF) operations yet
to get justice and compensation in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu
to get justice and compensation in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu
Amnesty International is
concerned that several adivasi (indigenous
and marginalized communities) victims of the decade-long Special Task
Force (STF) operations against Veerappan, who was killed by the STF
after being outlawed for sandalwood smuggling, are yet to receive
justice and compensation for the human rights violations perpetrated
against them. Human rights violations perpetrated in the course of
operations against Veerappan included unlawful killings; arbitrary
detention; and torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
or punishment (ill-treatment), including sexual violence.
and marginalized communities) victims of the decade-long Special Task
Force (STF) operations against Veerappan, who was killed by the STF
after being outlawed for sandalwood smuggling, are yet to receive
justice and compensation for the human rights violations perpetrated
against them. Human rights violations perpetrated in the course of
operations against Veerappan included unlawful killings; arbitrary
detention; and torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
or punishment (ill-treatment), including sexual violence.
Amnesty International has
learnt that, one year after an official
panel of inquiry led by Justice A. J. Sadashiva ordering the
Government of Karnataka to pay compensation to 51 victims, 13 of them
have yet to receive it. The Government of Tamil Nadu has paid
compensation amounts to 38 victims as directed in the order. In
January 2007, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) had directed
the two governments to pay compensation to 89 victims as per the
recommendations of the panel of inquiry.
panel of inquiry led by Justice A. J. Sadashiva ordering the
Government of Karnataka to pay compensation to 51 victims, 13 of them
have yet to receive it. The Government of Tamil Nadu has paid
compensation amounts to 38 victims as directed in the order. In
January 2007, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) had directed
the two governments to pay compensation to 89 victims as per the
recommendations of the panel of inquiry.
Notwithstanding the above
order, during the past year, human rights
organizations in the two states have been campaigning to ensure
justice for 104 other victims whose complaints of human rights
violations including arbitrary and indefinite detention, torture,
including to death, other ill-treatment and sexual assault were
reportedly ignored by the panel. The panel also failed to initiate
charges against any of the 39 STF officials named as perpetrators by
the victims during the proceedings, though it concluded that the STF
had perpetrated torture. However, Amnesty International has learnt
that a number of complaints against 39 STF officials have nevertheless
been filed by the victims in several police stations in Tamil Nadu and
Karnataka.
organizations in the two states have been campaigning to ensure
justice for 104 other victims whose complaints of human rights
violations including arbitrary and indefinite detention, torture,
including to death, other ill-treatment and sexual assault were
reportedly ignored by the panel. The panel also failed to initiate
charges against any of the 39 STF officials named as perpetrators by
the victims during the proceedings, though it concluded that the STF
had perpetrated torture. However, Amnesty International has learnt
that a number of complaints against 39 STF officials have nevertheless
been filed by the victims in several police stations in Tamil Nadu and
Karnataka.
In spite of the filed
complaints, a number of STF personnel named as
perpetrators in the victims' complaints were given awards and
promotions; furthermore, some of the officials named by the victims
were reportedly present in an official function held to distribute
compensation amounts in Karnataka in March 2007, leading to protests
from the victims.
As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, India is obliged to "ensure that any person whose rights or
freedoms... are violated shall have an effective remedy"; to "ensure
that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto
determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative
authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the
legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of
judicial remedy"; and to "ensure that the competent authorities shall
enforce such remedies when granted."
perpetrators in the victims' complaints were given awards and
promotions; furthermore, some of the officials named by the victims
were reportedly present in an official function held to distribute
compensation amounts in Karnataka in March 2007, leading to protests
from the victims.
As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, India is obliged to "ensure that any person whose rights or
freedoms... are violated shall have an effective remedy"; to "ensure
that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto
determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative
authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the
legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of
judicial remedy"; and to "ensure that the competent authorities shall
enforce such remedies when granted."
Amnesty International,
therefore, urges
• the Government of Karnataka to immediately distribute compensation
amounts to the 13 remaining victims as per the January 2007 order;
• the authorities of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu to thoroughly
investigate the pending human rights complaints against the 39 STF
officials and bring those suspected of perpetrating violations to
justice, in proceedings which meet international standards of fairness
and without the imposition of the death penalty;
• immediately suspend the officials named in the complaints from
active duty pending completion of investigations;
and
• the NHRC to participate in the above cases to help to ensure that
there is justice for the victims.
• the NHRC to re-examine victims' complaints ignored by the official
panel.
• the Government of Karnataka to immediately distribute compensation
amounts to the 13 remaining victims as per the January 2007 order;
• the authorities of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu to thoroughly
investigate the pending human rights complaints against the 39 STF
officials and bring those suspected of perpetrating violations to
justice, in proceedings which meet international standards of fairness
and without the imposition of the death penalty;
• immediately suspend the officials named in the complaints from
active duty pending completion of investigations;
and
• the NHRC to participate in the above cases to help to ensure that
there is justice for the victims.
• the NHRC to re-examine victims' complaints ignored by the official
panel.
Background
In 1993, the Governments of
Karnataka and Tamil Nadu had created the
STF to catch Veerappan and his associates who had remained outlawed
for more than seven years. On 21 October 2004, Veerappan and two of
his associates were killed during the STF operations. In all, 36
persons lost their lives during the STF operations.
STF to catch Veerappan and his associates who had remained outlawed
for more than seven years. On 21 October 2004, Veerappan and two of
his associates were killed during the STF operations. In all, 36
persons lost their lives during the STF operations.
In June 1999, the NHRC
appointed the official panel, consisting of
Justice Sadashiva and a former Director-General of India's premier
investigating agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The
panel submitted its recommendations in December 2003.
Justice Sadashiva and a former Director-General of India's premier
investigating agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The
panel submitted its recommendations in December 2003.
Covering
up Late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination conspiracy & BOFORS SCAM
The CBI & GOI is more
interested in favoring accused persons , Quattrochi &
closing BOFORS Case than punishing the guilty.
The GOI &
investigating authorities have failed to punish the real master minds behind
the Late Prime minister Shri . Rajiv Gandhi assassination case .
When a responsible
Indian citizen volunteered to appear before the supreme court of india as an
amicus curie , to give certain information before the court relating to this
assassination , he was not at all permitted. Instead he was threatened ,
attempts made to murder him , his news paper was closed , his jobs were
illegally snatched away , police & investigating agencies repeatedly
grilled him , THE PURPOSE IS TO SILENCE THAT PERSON . The Police failed
to act upon his complaints. The Supreme Court of India Failed to admit his PIL
Petitions. ALL TO COVER UP THE POWERS THAT BE .
who are covering-up late
p.m. rajiv gandhi assassination case? who are those conspirators? who are
trying to silence me?
My sufferings began hand in hand with my crusade. I have raised various issues of social concern from time to time at the appropriate levels, one of those is LATE P.M. RAJIV GANDHI ASASSINATION CASE. where-in only the tools of the conspirator's were punished where as the conspirators are roaming free. i have raised this topic of inequity , travesty of justice and sought a fair, proper enquiry& trial , at various forums. but to no avail.
the conspirators were disturbed by this and tried to silence me by threatening me, physically assaulting me and even made attempts to murder me. they prevented me from appearing before the JAIN COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY. they even manipulated the recruitment systems to deny me the appointments in R.B.I.CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE, P.E.S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MANDYA, N.I.E MYSORE , District Court Mysore & Illegally snatched away my job in RPG Cables Ltd , Mysore . they even tried to silence me by forcibly closing down my newspaper publications THE TESTUDO & VOICE OF CRUSADER.
my appeals for justice resulted only in police enquiries. the central intelligence bureau(I.B.) state intelligence & state police personnel enquired me exhaustively number of times, but they never did enquire the powers that be. any way these people don't have practical powers to enquire such people. the highest constitutional functionaries who can order a proper enquiry, trial are keeping mum inspite of repeated appeals. probably they are acting under the directions of conspirators. thereby they are not only covering up the crime, they are actively sponsoring terrorism , but are also violating my fundamental/human rights & obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
hereby , i do request you to protect my fundamental & human rights and to facilitate me to perform my FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES as a citizen of india.also, i do request you to give me information about following cases ,it's final reports& it's action taken report.
1.the roost resort scandal involving karnataka high court judges.
2.the scam of gem cutting & polishing units in mysore set-up under VISHWA self-employment scheme.
3.the murder of under-trial,TADA detenue mr.arjunan(forest brigand veerappan's brother).
4.the murder of journalist mr.satyanarayan near mysore.
5.the murder of ex-minister mr.nagappa near mysore.
6.the amount of ransom paid by state governments of karnataka,tamilnadu & the union govrnment and the general public to forest brigand veerappan during all kidnap episodes (including movie star rajkumar's).the role played by facilitators.the contents of all cassettes sent by veerappan to governments & vice versa.
7.the final report of justice a.j. sadashivas's committee which enquired into atrocities & human rights violations committed by police,special task force(S.T.F.) on the innocent tribal people of M.M.HILLS.
8.the report of past district magistrate of mysore mr.T.M.vijayabhaskar about the land scam in & around mysore.
9.even in developed countrise like U.S.A. & U.K. mal-handling of radio-active materials takes place now & then, which in itself constitute nuclear disasters on small scale.refer the DECCAN HERALD (12/10/03 to18/10/03).in india how many cases of mal-handling of radio-active materials have taken place? no public knowledge.in the back drop of corrupt,negligent,hush-hush,buck passing work culture in most of the government service in india, i do want to know how safe are we the mysoreans from the processing & storage of radio-active materials at M/S RARE EARTH MATERIALS PLANT,yelwal,mysore? in the past there were media reports about damages caused to the human beings ,the environment by the same organisation M/S R.E.M.P. & it's sister concern M/S URANIUM CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED(U.C.I.L.) at kerala state & at jadaguda ,orissa state respectively.even some of the insurance companies like M/S.metlife india insurance co.,don't cover the risk of health damages ,death due to nuclear hazards.in such an event who will bear the cost of compensation?how the quantum of compensation is calculated?give me information about the safety measures taken by M/S. R,E,M.P.mysore & the compensation pay sructure and the safety measures being followed by all agencies dealing with radio-active materials.
My sufferings began hand in hand with my crusade. I have raised various issues of social concern from time to time at the appropriate levels, one of those is LATE P.M. RAJIV GANDHI ASASSINATION CASE. where-in only the tools of the conspirator's were punished where as the conspirators are roaming free. i have raised this topic of inequity , travesty of justice and sought a fair, proper enquiry& trial , at various forums. but to no avail.
the conspirators were disturbed by this and tried to silence me by threatening me, physically assaulting me and even made attempts to murder me. they prevented me from appearing before the JAIN COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY. they even manipulated the recruitment systems to deny me the appointments in R.B.I.CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE, P.E.S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MANDYA, N.I.E MYSORE , District Court Mysore & Illegally snatched away my job in RPG Cables Ltd , Mysore . they even tried to silence me by forcibly closing down my newspaper publications THE TESTUDO & VOICE OF CRUSADER.
my appeals for justice resulted only in police enquiries. the central intelligence bureau(I.B.) state intelligence & state police personnel enquired me exhaustively number of times, but they never did enquire the powers that be. any way these people don't have practical powers to enquire such people. the highest constitutional functionaries who can order a proper enquiry, trial are keeping mum inspite of repeated appeals. probably they are acting under the directions of conspirators. thereby they are not only covering up the crime, they are actively sponsoring terrorism , but are also violating my fundamental/human rights & obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
hereby , i do request you to protect my fundamental & human rights and to facilitate me to perform my FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES as a citizen of india.also, i do request you to give me information about following cases ,it's final reports& it's action taken report.
1.the roost resort scandal involving karnataka high court judges.
2.the scam of gem cutting & polishing units in mysore set-up under VISHWA self-employment scheme.
3.the murder of under-trial,TADA detenue mr.arjunan(forest brigand veerappan's brother).
4.the murder of journalist mr.satyanarayan near mysore.
5.the murder of ex-minister mr.nagappa near mysore.
6.the amount of ransom paid by state governments of karnataka,tamilnadu & the union govrnment and the general public to forest brigand veerappan during all kidnap episodes (including movie star rajkumar's).the role played by facilitators.the contents of all cassettes sent by veerappan to governments & vice versa.
7.the final report of justice a.j. sadashivas's committee which enquired into atrocities & human rights violations committed by police,special task force(S.T.F.) on the innocent tribal people of M.M.HILLS.
8.the report of past district magistrate of mysore mr.T.M.vijayabhaskar about the land scam in & around mysore.
9.even in developed countrise like U.S.A. & U.K. mal-handling of radio-active materials takes place now & then, which in itself constitute nuclear disasters on small scale.refer the DECCAN HERALD (12/10/03 to18/10/03).in india how many cases of mal-handling of radio-active materials have taken place? no public knowledge.in the back drop of corrupt,negligent,hush-hush,buck passing work culture in most of the government service in india, i do want to know how safe are we the mysoreans from the processing & storage of radio-active materials at M/S RARE EARTH MATERIALS PLANT,yelwal,mysore? in the past there were media reports about damages caused to the human beings ,the environment by the same organisation M/S R.E.M.P. & it's sister concern M/S URANIUM CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED(U.C.I.L.) at kerala state & at jadaguda ,orissa state respectively.even some of the insurance companies like M/S.metlife india insurance co.,don't cover the risk of health damages ,death due to nuclear hazards.in such an event who will bear the cost of compensation?how the quantum of compensation is calculated?give me information about the safety measures taken by M/S. R,E,M.P.mysore & the compensation pay sructure and the safety measures being followed by all agencies dealing with radio-active materials.
** LTTE-Sonia link ?
http://indiaview.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/ltte-sonia-link/ ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18053175/Sonias-Ottavio-Quattrochchi-Paid-for-Rajiv-Gandhi ,
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/watch?v=g4uinmueUqg ,
http://www.legalsutra.org/1466/criminal-conspiracy/ ,
http://www.spur.asn.au/extra/rajiv.htm ,
An LTTE-Sonia family link?
S. Gurumurthy,Newindpress
April 29 2008
The LTTE suicide squad did
plan and eliminate Rajiv Gandhi. But, why did the LTTE do it? Was there a
larger conspiracy that extended beyond the LTTE as the strike force?
Was the LTTE the author of the
crime or the mercenary for some one else or for some purpose that yielded some
benefit to it? These questions persisted even after the actual assassins were
brought to book.
The Narasimha Rao government
appointed the Jain Commission to go into the conspiracy angle to the murder.In
its interim report the commission did exceedingly good work to bring on record
evidence about the political forces involved in promoting the LTTE in Tamil
Nadu that made the crime possible.
Yet it made a mockery of its
main work, the conspiracy angle. It floated dubious and wild theories,
involving Mossad! CIA! Besides adding confusion, it ended up trivialising a
very serious exercise. This also robbed the commission of its credibility.
As the commission’s final
report proved a flop, the Vajpayee government appointed a Multi- Disciplinary
Monitoring Agency (MDMA) in 1998 to unearth the conspiracy angle.
But the person who first
demanded, but, ultimately made, investigation into the conspiracy to murder
Rajiv Gandhi irrelevant was none other than his widow Sonia Gandhi.
Her attitude to the
investigation and suspected actors in the murder dramatically changed. Her
conduct in 1997 when she was working to enter active politics was a stark
contrast to her attitude after taking over the congress leadership on the Jain
Commission issue.
In 1997, she demanded that the
DMK which, the Jain commission had said, was part of the conspiracy, be sacked
as a partner of the UF alliance and pulled down the government when the demand
was not met. Her party insisted the entire facts about the conspiracy be
investigated and revealed.
Addressing a meeting at
Amethi, Sonia hinted that the DMK was a fan of the LTTE and charged that those
who doubted the Jain commission report were diverting the attention from the
investigation into the conspiracy to murder Rajiv and demanded that the probe
be completed expeditiously (Indian Express 2.2.1998).
But, once she took over the
party leadership, she not only ceased to evince any interest in pursuing the
Rajiv Gandhi murder conspiracy, but also began allying with the alleged
conspirators themselves.
The developments, put
together, reveal a shocking picture.The year after taking over the Congress,
Sonia Gandhi makes a secret move.
In the year 1999, she told then
President Dr K R Narayanan privately that ‘neither she nor her son and daughter
wanted any of the four convicts’ sentenced to death for Rajiv’s assassination
‘to be hanged’, and pleaded that no child should be orphaned by an act of the
State.
Noted the Indian Express (Nov
20, 1999) that before her plea for mercy to the Rajiv killers the Congress
party was the leading opponent of mercy to them. This silenced the party once
and for all.
What transpired at her private
meeting with the President was revealed not by Sonia, but by Mohini Giri (the
former chairperson of the National Women’s Commission) and on that basis
Nalini’s death sentence was commuted to life. (Frontline Nov 5-18, 2005).
Then, in February 2004, there
were reports, editorially commented by the Island newspaper in Colombo on Feb
20, 2004, that Eduardo Faleiro, her emissary, had a secret meeting with the
LTTE chief Prabhakaran at Killinochi. Island had also referred to reports
that Sonia’s mother Ms Paula Maino had met Anton Balasingham,
LTTE’s point man in London, in connection with the electoral alliance between
the DMK and the Congress. While Eduardo Faleiro at least made a feeble attempt
to deny the meeting, Paulo Maino would not even deny that.Third, the Paulo Maino meeting preceded,
and the Faleiro meeting succeeded, the unbelievable U-turn of Sonia Gandhi to
forge alliance with the DMK which was accused by her own party in 1997 of being
part of the conspiracy to murder her husband. The DMK-Congress alliance seems to have
been agreed upon sometime in December 2003. In January 2004, Sonia met the DMK
chief and concretised the alliance.
The coming together of one of
the alleged conspirators and the victim of the conspiracy made a mockery of any
further investigation into Rajiv Gandhi murder.
For the last four years there
is not a single word spoken by Sonia on pursuing the Rajiv Gandhi murderers and
on unearthing the conspiracy or for the extradition of Prabhakaran or Pottu
Amman.
This is despite the fact that,
when, on April 10, 2002, Prabhakaran met the press at Killinochi, he did not
even deny that LTTE was involved in Rajiv assassination.
Fourth, the LTTE too responded
favourably to signals from Sonia that she was not against LTTE.
On January 27, 2006, Anton
Balasingham, told an Indian TV news channel that the Rajiv killing was
‘monumental tragedy’ and asked the people of India to be ‘magnanimous to put
the past behind’ and deal with the LTTE.
Fifth, Sonia did not object to
the inclusion of the DMK woman MP in whose house Sivarasan the main killer of
Rajiv Gandhi had stayed for which she was detained under the TADA, as a
minister in the UPA government.
Sixth, the MDMA which was
appointed by the NDA government after Sonia rejected the Action Taken Report on
the Jain Commission, has virtually become defunct under the UPA regime.
Since 2004, she has not
uttered a single word asking what the MDMA is doing.
And finally now in March 2008,
Priyanka Vadra, Sonia’s daughter makes a secret visit to Vellore jail and meets
the first accused in the murder of Rajiv, for over an hour.
Media reports say that they sat
by each other’s side, cried and professed goodwill towards each other! No one
knows what transpired between them. The meeting clearly illegal, looks almost a
conspiracy, would have remained a secret had the media not exposed it.
Priyanka said that neither
Sonia nor Rahul or Priyanka believe in hate or anger, and that the visit was
her way of coming to terms with the Rajiv Gandhi murder.
Moral high ground seems to be a
cover for undisclosed political strategies. But where was this high moral
ground when Sonia angrily pulled down the UF government on the ground that DMK,
a suspected co-conspirator with LTTE, was part of the alliance?
Is Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination
a personal affair between the Sonia Gandhi family and the LTTE for the former
to punish or pardon the latter?
LTTE has neither confessed nor
regretted its action for the Gandhis to pardon. The LTTE is even today
unrepenting.
The prosecution case is that the
LTTE supremo decided to avenge Rajiv Gandhi for sending IPKF to Sri Lanka and
betraying the LTTE. But that was no personal decision of Rajiv Gandhi. The
assassination was an act against the state of India.
This is how it should be seen
and pursued. Neither Sonia nor Priyanka nor the Congress has the right to
pardon the criminals who have challenged the sovereignty of India.
QED: Sonia Gandhi family and the
LTTE connection is mysterious. Is the maverick Dr Subramanian Swamy right after
all in his theory that LTTE and the Maino family have had links before? http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IEM20080428231348&Title=Main+Article&rLink=0
RELATED STORIES:
Do you know Sonia : Subramanian
Swamy @ http://www.saveindi aforum.com/ dynamic/
Sonia Cong’s blitzkrieg
evangelisation thru RBI: V. Sundaram @ http://www.newstodaynet.com/2007sud/may07/230507.htm
She became loyal bit late: by
Gurumurthy@ http://indiaview.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/she-became-loyal-to-india-a-trifle-late/
Demo-narchy of India @ http://indiaview.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/de%e2%80%99mo-narchy-of-democratic-india/
Sonia-LTTE link : by Gurumurthy
@ http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IEM20080428231348&Title=Main+Article&rLink=0
RAJIV ASSASSINATED
The French Intelligence
Agencies as per a regular routine Intelligence Drill, keep under heavily
Intelligence Surveillance all the activities of all the Foreigners in all the
Five Star Hotels.politicsparty.com has learnt from highly placed sources that,
“In the course of the routine surveillance the Intelligence Agencies of France
have in their possession On Camera Footage of a now Highly Classified Recording
of a Secret Meeting at a Paris Five Star Hotel in 1991.”The L.T.T.E was
fighting through the use of Terrorism for the separation of the Tamil portion
of the country from Sri Lanka. Rajiv Gandhi as Prime Minister had sent the
Indian Army to Sri Lanka to assist the Government forces there to fight and
destroy the L.T.T.E. The Indian Army was finally withdrawn from Sri Lanka
without achieving success. Rajiv thus became an enemy of the L.T.T.E.Rajiv lost
power in 1989 Lok Sabha Elections.In 1991, Rajiv Gandhi was the Congress
President, Chandrashekar was the Prime Minister.The Lok Sabha Elections were
announced after Rajiv withdrew the Congress support to the Chandrashekar
Government.The L.T.T.E. Chief had sent two L.T.T.E delegations to New Delhi in
1991, to meet and discuss with Rajiv Gandhi, to understand his attitude towards
the L.T.T.E. After these meetings the L.T.T.E. Chief was not convinced that
Rajiv would be soft on the L.T.T.E. In fact Prabhakaran expected Rajiv to be
hostile to the L.T.T.E.In the 1991 Elections Rajiv was not expected to come
back to power. However the L.T.T.E. did not want the risk of allowing Rajiv to
come to power.Rajiv Gandhi and his Congress won a massive victory in 1984
because of the nationwide sympathy generated by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s
Assassination by her Sikh Bodyguards. Rajiv’s Congress won 414 Lok Sabha MPs.
Rajiv looked like being Prime Minister forever.However, Rajiv got in to a
serious Credibility Problem when the HDW Submarine Deal Broke. Rajiv threw out
the then Defence Minister V.P.Singh from the Party. Rajiv’s Coterie made a
loyal V.P.Singh an enemy of Rajiv.Thereafter the Bofors Gun Deal Scam tumbled
out of the Swedish Closet. Rajiv handled the Bofors Scam horribly. Rajiv’s
former aides manipulated to destroy Rajiv and Rajiv’s Politics. Rajiv lost
complete credibility. Rajiv’s Congress won 195 MPs but lost the Lok Sabha
Elections and the Central Government in 1989. The V.P.Singh Government came to
power and demonstrated quickness in getting the Bofors Pay Offs in Foreign Bank
Accounts Sealed.The Bofors Money Trail led directly to the Italian
Wheeler-Dealer Ottavio Quattrocchi.Quattrocchi realized that India’s Opposition
Politicians and Anti-Congress Governments in their passion to expose Rajiv
would chase the Bofors Scam and all its beneficiaries. However, in that process
the involvement of Quattrocchi would be completely exposed. Quatrocchi believed
that Rajiv and his Congress were not winning the 1991 Elections. The Third
Front Government of V.P.Singh was expected to win. The V.P. Singh Government
would accelerate investigation in to the Bofors Scam. Quattrocchi’s role in the
Bofors Scam would be completely exposed thus leading to the jailing of
Quattrocchi.Quattrocchi panicked. There was only one way for Quattrocchi to
survive. The Bofors scam must be buried. The Bofors Enquiry cannot be stopped
if Rajiv was Alive. If Rajiv was not there then the Political System would lose
interest in the Bofors Scam. So to bury the Bofors Scam Burying Rajiv was a
necessity for Quattrocchi. Only then could Quattrocchi happily survive and
enjoy the millions looted from India’s Public Exchequer.Anton Balasingham was
the Principal Adviser, Most Trusted Lieutenant, Globe Trotting Apex Negotiator,
Vital Deal Maker, Super Strategist, Spokesman and Personal Friend of the Chief
of the L.T.T.E. Velupillai Prabhakaran.Sources say that, “Quattrocchi got in
touch with the L.T.T.E. The meeting with the L.T.T.E. was fixed in a Five Star
Hotel in Paris.Ottavio Quattrocchi and Anton Balasingham met. Quattrocchi
convinced Balasingham that Rajiv’s death was vital to both. If Rajiv were dead
then the Bofors Scam would die. If Rajiv was dead then the L.T.T.E. could be
confident that the Indian Army will not go to Sri Lanka to destroy the L.T.T.E.
Quattrocchi handed over Bags of Dollars to Balasingham as payment for Rajiv’s
Assassination.The entire meeting and conversation between Ottavio Quattrocchi
and Anton Balasingham was Recorded by the French Intelligence Agencies.”On the
day of his Assassination Rajiv Gandhi was in Vishakapatnam. Rajiv was
campaigning for his fond candidate Uma Gajapati Raju. Rajiv was enjoying the
campaigning. Rajiv was in no mood to leave Vishakapatnam, on that evening.A
Trio of Congress Busybodies including P.V.Narasimha Rao made frantic Phone
Calls from New Delhi urging Rajiv to leave Vishakapatnam and fly to Chennai.
Rajiv keen on spending the night at Vishakapatnam, tried avoiding to go to
Chennai. Rajiv made an excuse that his aircraft was not in perfect order. The
Congress Busybodies of Delhi got the Aircraft speedily checked, repaired and
told Rajiv that it was ready. The Congress Busybodies forced a
reluctant-to-leave-Vishakapatnam Rajiv, to fly from Vishakapatnam to Chennai
enroute to Sriperumbudur in Tamilnadu.Rajiv flew to Chennai and went by road to
Sriperumbudur. As soon as the cavalcade of cars of Rajiv and the Tamilnadu
State leaders accompanying Rajiv reached Sriperumbudur, Rajiv got out of the
car and walked through the crowd to the Dias.When any national leader visits
any part of the country then the moment the leader gets down from the Aircraft,
the entire State Leadership of his Party surrounds him. The State Leaders stick
to him through out the Visit until he gets back in to the Airport. If a
Photograph is taken at any given minute of the visit, the Photo will contain
the National Leader and the Top State Leaders. Whether it is Vajpayee, Advani,
Rajnath Singh, Sonia or any national leader the scenario is the same. Every
Photo Frame will consist of the National leader being surrounded by State
Leaders.When Rajiv alighted at Sriperumbudur all the state Leaders were there.
However, each of the Tamilnadu State Leaders suddenly decided to keep away from
Rajiv. From the car, Rajiv walked through the crowd unaccompanied by any State
Leader.So, when the Human Bomb Exploded, Rajiv was Blown to pieces, but not a
single Tamilnadu State Leader Died with him. G.K.Moopanar, P.Chidambaram,
Maragatham Chandrashekar and several Other Tamilnadu state Leaders did not walk
with Rajiv. Strange and Impossible. But the Tamilnadu State leaders allowed
Rajiv to walk the Death-Walk Alone.In the Final Photo Frame of Rajiv Gandhi, no
Tamilnadu State leader was present with Rajiv. Were all these State Leaders
aware that Rajiv would be killed and hence kept away from Rajiv to save their
lives?The Investigation in to the Rajiv Assassination has not interrogated or
put on the Lie Detector Test and the Narco-Analysis Test the Congress Bigwigs
who insisted that Rajiv must leave Vishakapatnam and go to Tamilnadu, that Assassination
night. Why?Similarly the Investgation did not interrogate and subject to a Lie
Detector and a Narco Analysis Test the Tamilnadu Congress State Leaders who
deserted Rajiv immediately after he got out of the car at Sriperumbudur.
Why?Intelligence Agencies Sources say that the International Arms Dealer Adnan
Kashogi provided the Bomb Belt worn by the L.T.T.E.’s suicide Human Bomb to
assassinate Rajiv Gandhi. India’s Investigation never pursued this lead.
Why?Later P.V.Narasimha Rao’s son Prabhakar Rao and Adnan Kashogi’s Son were
involved in a UREA SCAM. The Government of India in Dollars issued 125 crores
even before the Urea arrived in India. Till today the Urea has not arrived. The
125 Crores has not been recovered from Narasimha Rao’s Son. Now the Manmohan
Singh Government has allowed the Crores of Rupees in the Swiss Banks to be
defreezed. Narasimha Rao deserved to be in jail for corruption but Manmohan
calls him a Saint.India’s Investigation in to the Rajiv Assassination has not
investigated P.V.Narasimha Rao and Adnan Kashoggi’s Family to ascertain the
facts and complicity, if any, in the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. Why?Ottavio
Quattrocchi was the Mastermind in the Conspiracy to Assassinate Rajiv Gandhi.
But Quattrocchi was never investigated. Why?The Intelligence Agencies of
France, Israel and the United States of America have Highly Classified Secret
Data pertaining to all the details of the Rajiv Gandhi Assassination.Israel,
France and US are all Democracies. All three nations are closely involved with
India in the International war against terrorism. It is their responsibility to
provide India with every bit of evidence and information that they and their
Intelligence agencies possess about the Assassination of R ajiv Gandhi.So far
these Nations have not given India any information because the government of
India has not requested them. The moment India requests these countries then
they will give to India, all the information they have.Politicsparty.com
Requests the Parliament of India to ensure that the Government of India obtains
all the information pertaining to the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi available
with the Intelligence Agencies of France, Israel and the US and discloses all
the information to India’s Parliament.politicsparty.com Requests the Parliament
of India to ensure that an investigation is ordered in to the Role of Ottavio
Quattrocchi in the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi.Quattrocchi must be arrested,
brought to India put on a Lie Detector Test and a Narco-Analysis Test and Questioned
about his Role in the Conspiracy to Assassinate Rajiv Gandhi.politicsparty.com
expects India’s Parliament to do justice to one of its Assassinated Member of
Parliament Rajiv Gandhi.President of India Kalam is now in France. The
Government of India must request President Kalam to request the French
President to make available to India the Tapes of the Secret Meeting in the
Paris Hotel and all other information involving the Assassination of Rajiv
Gandhi.The People of India must know the truth about the Assassination of Rajiv
and the Conspirators must be arrested, prosecuted and given the Death Sentence.
Sorse of the story hear By :- http://blogs.ibibo.com/ViewComments.aspx?blogid=3c849c43-7793-4455-831c-37f1e8f84ef6&mid=811ff191-26ba-4157-9dea-951460e7e3fc
Sorse of the story hear By :- http://blogs.ibibo.com/ViewComments.aspx?blogid=3c849c43-7793-4455-831c-37f1e8f84ef6&mid=811ff191-26ba-4157-9dea-951460e7e3fc
DMK helped
LTTE assassinate Rajiv Gandhi.
Munnetra Kazhagam, DMK Leader
|
|
In 1976, Gandhi's federal
government dismissed Karunanidhi's government, which was accused of corruption.
A year later, MGR won local elections and sent Karunanidhi into political
wilderness until MGR's death in 1987.
After a year of direct rule by
the federal government, the DMK party regained power in Tamil Nadu in 1989. Two
years later the federal government dismissed Karunanidhi for a second time,
accusing him of not doing enough to crack down on the Tamil Tigers in his
state.
Further, the Commission said,
the LTTE was getting its supplies, including arms, ammunition, explosives, fuel
and other essential items from Tamil Nadu to continue its fight against the
IPKF that too with the support of the DMK Government, State Administration and
connivance of the law enforcement agencies.
The report said that soon
after the DMK Government took over the reins of power in Tamil Nadu, "the
LTTE slowly began to consolidate itself in the State and their clandestine
activities, heretofore dormant, became more and more pronounced. All the activities
of the LTTE at this stage towards resource mobilisation, propaganda and
treatment of their wounded cadres, had taken an anti-national dimension.''
The Commission noted the visit
of the then DMK MP, Mr. V. Gopalaswamy, MP (DMK) to Northern Sri Lanka and his
reported meeting with Prabhakaran between February 8, 1989, and March 3, 1989.
"This visit by Mr. V.
Gopalaswamy, and the manner in which this entire episode was dealt with by the
DMK party sent clear signals to the pro-LTTE anti-IPKF elements in the State as
well as LTTE itself that the newly-elected Government would not resort to any
drastic action against such elements; on the other hand, the impression that
the entire episode created was that pro-LTTE gestures, even if they were
illegal, would be tolerated by the Government.''
The Commission's report said
the then Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi, was keen that "some satisfactory
solution be arrived at with the LTTE so that the Indo-Sri Lankan Accord could
be implemented in letter and spirit. He discussed this concern with Mr.
Karunanidhi and sought his assistance.'' After Mr. V. P. Singh became the Prime
Minister on December 2, 1989, it was spelt out that if no solution came, India
would no longer give any military or monetary help to any of the groups, nor
allow its mainland to be used for militant activities. "The LTTE remained
adamant during their parleys with Mr. Karunanidhi, and continued to demand the
formation of Eelam,'' the report noted.
The interim report said that
credible reports existed of "active connivance of some DMK leaders with
the LTTE. The LTTE was in continuous interaction with Mr. Karunanidhi,
primarily to ensure that their activities continue unhindered even after the
Padmanabha killing.'' The ATR "noted'' the observation of the Commission
that there was a nexus between the LTTE and the ULFA and their combined
endeavours in Tamil Nadu had also been confirmed.
The Commission's report
ponders over questions of aid to the LTTE in the killing of Rajiv Gandhi.
"Were there other forces behind the LTTE involved in the conspiracy for
the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi? These are questions requiring a deep and
anxious probe,'' the report said referring to conspiratorial aspects which were
yet to be dealt with by the one-man probe panel.
Soon after the DMK Government
took over the reins of power in Tamil Nadu, the LTTE slowly began to
consolidate itself in the State. During 1990, a growing nexus between the LTTE
and DMK and its repercussions on the local law enforcement machinery were
discernible. The assassination of EPRLF leader K. Padmanabha and others at
Madras on 19th June 1990 was a shocking reminder of the impunity with which the
LTTE could operate in India.
The case assumes significance
due to the fact that striking similarities were found in the Padmanabha
assassination and the case relating to the assassination of Shri Rajiv Gandhi.
It can, therefore, be safely concluded that the growing connivance of the DMK
Government with the LTTE having been brought to the knowledge of the National Front
Government, effective steps were not taken by the Central government to check
it, whatever may be the reasons.
From the evaluation of the
material, the conclusion is irresistible that there was tacit support to the
LTTE by Shri M. Karunanidhi and his Government and law enforcement agencies.
The charges, put
together as long quotations from the report, include: that the DMK provided a
safe sanctuary for the LTTE cadres and activists, it gave advice, active
assistance, finance and security cover to LTTE operations, and that the
assassination of Rajiv Gandhi would not have been possible the way it happened
without the nexus between the LTTE and the DMK, a nexus which started a chain
of events which led to the survival and growth of the LTTE in Tamil Nadu long
after the Government of India's attitude had changed towards the LTTE and
hostilities had broken out between the Indian Peace Keeping Force and the LTTE
in Sri Lanka, and finally that the DMK leader and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister,
Mr. M. Karunanidhi, had "himself been instrumental in ensuring that things
went smoothly for LTTE'' and that the cadres of the LTTE had little fear of the
security agencies in India "thanks to the patronage of the DMK
Government''.
The Bofors whistle-blower speaks out
Sten Lindström, the former head of the Swedish police who
led the investigations into the Bofors-India howitzer deal, has disclosed that
he was the one who fed the journalistic investigation that was published on the
pages of The Hindu in 1988-89. The identity of the source
has been a detail that The Hinduhas
steadfastly held on to for a quarter century. The “tell-all” interview that Mr.
Lindström has now given Chitra Subramaniam-Duella, who was one of the
journalists who had worked on the story while with The Hindu, from Europe, was published online on
April 24 in ‘The Hoot.'
The latest development in the Bofors scandal comes a quarter
century after Swedish state radio got it all going on April 16, 1987.
The one part of Mr. Lindström's interview that is likely to
generate political heat is his comment on Rajiv Gandhi and Ottavio Quattrocchi,
the Italian businessman who is accused of being a middleman in the deal: “There
was no evidence that [Rajiv Gandhi] had received any bribe. But he watched the
massive cover-up in India and Sweden and did nothing. Many Indian institutions
were tarred, innocent people were punished while the guilty got away. The
evidence against Ottavio Quattrocchi was conclusive. Through a front company
called A.E. Services, bribes paid by Bofors landed in Quattrocchi's account
which he subsequently cleaned out because India said there was no evidence
linking him to the Bofors deal. Nobody in Sweden or Switzerland was allowed to
interrogate him.”
Mr. Lindström is described in the interview as the one who
leaked some 350 documents, which included payment instructions to banks,
contracts, handwritten notes, minutes of meetings and Bofors Managing Director
Martin Ardbo's diary that carried a lot of sensitive information.
Many of the documents, painstakingly verified and studied by The Hindu, were printed in facsimile form on its
pages in 1988-1989.
Asked by The Hindu for his comments on the interview, N. Ram, who led the
journalistic investigation behind the coverage of l'affaire Bofors in the newspaper at the time and
who later became its Editor-in-Chief, said: “I'm old-fashioned enough to be
very protective of highly sensitive, privileged sources. I'm not going to
confirm or deny who the source was. What I can confirm is that I met the source
on more than one occasion, along with Chitra Subramaniam, and also was in touch
[with the source] on the phone.”
In ‘The Hoot' interview Mr. Lindström recalls the occasion when
Mr. Ram went to his office and he handed over the documents, proceeding to say
that The
Hindu's role was that of a “medium of communication.” He speaks also of
a sense of disappointment over the process as, “they published the documents as
and when they wanted without any respect for the risks other people were taking
to get the facts out.”
The former police chief added: “The most explosive documents
that involved the political payments were Ardbo's notes and diary. The Hindu published them several months after
they had them. In the meantime, there was a serious difficulty... There were
consequences for me and my family. The Hindu seemed unconcerned.”
Mr. Ram, who stepped down as The Hindu's Editor-in-Chief earlier this year,
had this to say on these points: “The privileged source was not willing to give
the entire documentation in possession to us. So it was a process of
negotiating over a period of about one and a half years with the source. The
source was, for whatever reason, not willing to part with the document cache in
one go, and would only give it in phased-out instalments over this long
period.”
Mr. Ram added: “There was no question of the newspaper
publishing the documents and other information arbitrarily, as and when we
pleased. We were not fools to hold back material without due cause and incur
the risk of letting others run away with our story! In a story with such big
stakes, involving a great newspaper's credibility and people's reputations,
there was a need for due diligence, for devil's advocacy, for making
connections and drawing inferences, for being fair and just. We needed to
translate — accurately — some of the material from Swedish. As for the Ardbo
diary — which the police had seized and returned to him, preserving only
photocopies — it presented a real challenge. Some of the handwritten diary
entries made explosive suggestions but they were semi-coded, using initials and
sometimes misspelling key names.”
Possibly for the first time, Mr. Lindström reveals how the
Indian angle came into focus: “It was an accident. We were conducting several
search-and-seize operations in the premises of Bofors and their executives. I
have some experience in this area, so I asked my team to take everything they
could find. In the pile were one set of documents to Swiss banks with
instructions that the name of the recipient should be blocked out. An
accountant doing his job asked why anonymity was necessary since the payments
were legal. Bofors was unable to explain and then we found more and more
documents leading to India.”
Mr. Ram said: “There were various inputs that were key to our
investigation. For example, there was specific information made available
through Malini Parthasarathy by a member of the JPC [the Joint Parliamentary
Committee that went into the Bofors affair] that enabled the investigation to
make a connection and draw a crucial inference from the documentation. On the
cover-up aspect, we learnt a lot from confidential meetings I had, at their
request, with Defence Minister K.C. Pant and Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.”
In the interview, Mr. Lindström aired his thoughts on the
media's role in such contexts. He said: “There needs to be a free and fair
discussion in the media about itself. The media is the watchdog of our society
– but who is watching the media? Most whistle-blowers around the world leak
information to the media because they feel they owe it to their country, their
job or the position they are elected to. Genuine whistle-blowers also expect
the media to be responsible and according to me this means that the media has
to understand the motives of whistle-blowers. Not everyone is driven by the
same motive. This is where investigative journalism comes in. Every role has
its limits. I cannot become a journalist, a journalist cannot become a judge
and a judge cannot become a politician. Who controls the media, what are their
interests? What happens if a reporter is also part of the management? Do
journalistic ethics compete with business and political interests of the media
organisation? Can an ombudsman be the answer? If not, let us all work together
globally to find a solution we all respect and understand.”
Speaking on his chosen role as whistle-blower in the affair, Mr.
Lindström does say this: “My only option was to leak the documents to someone
we could trust.” He adds: “The role of the whistle-blower is a part of
democracy. When all official channels are clogged, you have to take a decision.
We have a culture here that it is okay to blow the whistle. I have met other
whistle-blowers. I knew what I was doing when I leaked the documents to you. I
could not count on my government or Bofors or the government of India to get to
the bottom of this.”
Then, in a cathartic finale, Mr. Lindström says: “False closures
of corruption bleed the system. Every day has to matter. When something like
the scale and violence of Bofors happens, you begin to question your own faith
as a professional and a human being. When you start losing faith, you begin to
lose hope. When hope is lost, everything is lost. We cannot afford to let that
happen. Maybe we will get nowhere, but silence cannot be the answer.”
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ #LIG-2
/ 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP
WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR
, HEBBAL ,MYSORE - 570017INDIA… cell
:09341820313
home page : home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / , http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / , http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com / , http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment